[Bug sanitizer/85389] posix_memalign() crash with address sanitizer when passing invalid arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85389 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Apr 18 07:02:40 2018 New Revision: 259459 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259459&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR sanitizer/85389 * asan/asan_allocator.h (kAllocatorSpac

[Bug c++/84463] [6/7 Regression] Supposedly-incompliant "error: '* key0' is not a constant expression"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84463 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] |[6/7 Regression] |Supp

[Bug sanitizer/85389] posix_memalign() crash with address sanitizer when passing invalid arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85389 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Oops, the above comment doesn't belong to this bug. The commit was supposed to fix PR85394 instead.

[Bug sanitizer/85394] [8 Regression] Unable to run sanitized executables on ppc64le Ubuntu and SLES

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85394 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/85445] New: [nvptx, openacc] Calls to worker and vector routine broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85445 Bug ID: 85445 Summary: [nvptx, openacc] Calls to worker and vector routine broken Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug c++/84630] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE: TYPE_NAME() used on error_mark_node in tsubst_lambda_expr, at cp/pt.c:17141

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84630 --- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Apr 18 08:03:45 2018 New Revision: 259460 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259460&root=gcc&view=rev Log: /cp 2018-04-18 Paolo Carlini PR c++/84630 *

[Bug c++/84630] [6/7 Regression] ICE: TYPE_NAME() used on error_mark_node in tsubst_lambda_expr, at cp/pt.c:17141

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84630 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] ICE: |[6/7 Regression] ICE:

[Bug tree-optimization/85446] New: [7/8 Regression] wrong-code on riscv64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85446 Bug ID: 85446 Summary: [7/8 Regression] wrong-code on riscv64 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimiz

[Bug tree-optimization/85446] [7/8 Regression] wrong-code on riscv64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85446 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/85446] [7/8 Regression] wrong-code on riscv64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85446 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 43972 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43972&action=edit gcc8-pr85446.patch Untested fix.

[Bug ipa/84149] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2017 505.mcf/605.mcf ~10% performance regression with r256888

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84149 --- Comment #12 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 43973 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43973&action=edit Unreduced test-case Unfortunately I see one more ICE (reduced from Firefox w/ -O3). I'm currently reducing that

[Bug ipa/84149] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2017 505.mcf/605.mcf ~10% performance regression with r256888

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84149 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug middle-end/26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163 Bug 26163 depends on bug 84149, which changed state. Bug 84149 Summary: [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2017 505.mcf/605.mcf ~10% performance regression with r256888 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84149 What|Removed

[Bug other/84613] [meta-bug] SPEC compiler performance issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84613 Bug 84613 depends on bug 84149, which changed state. Bug 84149 Summary: [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2017 505.mcf/605.mcf ~10% performance regression with r256888 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84149 What|Removed

[Bug middle-end/84016] [8 Regression] Spec2000 regression around Jan 14 and Jan 19 2018

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84016 Bug 84016 depends on bug 84149, which changed state. Bug 84149 Summary: [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2017 505.mcf/605.mcf ~10% performance regression with r256888 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84149 What|Removed

[Bug target/81084] [8 Regression] powerpcspe port full of confusing configury / command-line options not related to SPE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084 --- Comment #25 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Apr 18 08:47:26 2018 New Revision: 259461 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259461&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/81084 * config.gcc: Obsolete powerpc*-*-*spe*.

[Bug ipa/85447] New: [8 Regression] ICE in create_specialized_node, at ipa-cp.c:3870 since r259319

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85447 Bug ID: 85447 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in create_specialized_node, at ipa-cp.c:3870 since r259319 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug middle-end/26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163 Bug 26163 depends on bug 84149, which changed state. Bug 84149 Summary: [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2017 505.mcf/605.mcf ~10% performance regression with r256888 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84149 What|Removed

[Bug middle-end/84016] [8 Regression] Spec2000 regression around Jan 14 and Jan 19 2018

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84016 Bug 84016 depends on bug 84149, which changed state. Bug 84149 Summary: [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2017 505.mcf/605.mcf ~10% performance regression with r256888 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84149 What|Removed

[Bug ipa/84149] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2017 505.mcf/605.mcf ~10% performance regression with r256888

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84149 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/84613] [meta-bug] SPEC compiler performance issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84613 Bug 84613 depends on bug 84149, which changed state. Bug 84149 Summary: [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2017 505.mcf/605.mcf ~10% performance regression with r256888 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84149 What|Removed

[Bug ipa/85447] [8 Regression] ICE in create_specialized_node, at ipa-cp.c:3870 since r259319

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85447 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/85383] [8 regression] many ICE failures at gcc/toplev.c:325 starting with r259346

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85383 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/85382] code compiled with fno-builtin uses builtin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85382 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/81084] [8 Regression] powerpcspe port full of confusing configury / command-line options not related to SPE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/85390] possible missed optimisation / regression from 6.3 with conditional expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85390 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-* Component

[Bug lto/85391] [8 Regression] ICE in add_type_duplicate, at ipa-devirt.c:1887

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85391 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug libstdc++/85442] [8 Regression] cxx11-ios_failure.lo build fails for microblaze

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85442 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Can be reproduced even on x86_64-linux with CXXFLAGS='-g -O2 -D_GNU_SOURCE -gno-as-loc-support' cxx11-ios_failure-lt.s: Assembler messages: cxx11-ios_failure-lt.s: Fatal error: duplicate .debug_line sections

[Bug c++/80290] [6/7/8 Regression] g++ uses unreasonable amount of memory compiling nested string maps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80290 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7 Regression] g++ uses |[6/7/8 Regression] g++ uses

[Bug libstdc++/85396] _M_t._M_emplace_hint_unique

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85396 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||arm --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener

[Bug go/85429] Several gotools tests FAIL with Solaris as

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85429 --- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor --- > Does the SPARC Solaris assembler support a syntax like > > .section ".go.buildid",#exclude > > ? That's what gas seems to support for co

[Bug fortran/85448] New: the compiler selects the wrong subroutine because of bind(c,name=...)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85448 Bug ID: 85448 Summary: the compiler selects the wrong subroutine because of bind(c,name=...) Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/85398] g++ reports "array subscript is above array bounds" when it cannot be sure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85398 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- This is the simple case of GCC optimizing the access to a constant: [50.00%]: max.0_11 = max; if (max.0_11 > 1) goto ; [50.00%] else goto ; [50.00%] [25.00%]: _13 = right[0]; left[1

[Bug jit/85384] libgccjit does not work if --with-gcc-major-version is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85384 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Apr 18 09:46:58 2018 New Revision: 259462 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259462&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR jit/85384 * acx.m4 (GCC_BASE_VER): Remove \$\$ from sed

[Bug jit/85384] libgccjit does not work if --with-gcc-major-version is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85384 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Richard prefered David's patch and we have some sed invocations that expect s/something.*// to match everything until end of line in gcc/Makefile.in, so if some sed versions don't do it, it would break other

[Bug lto/85405] [6/7 Regression] ICE in odr_types_equivalent_p, at ipa-devirt.c:1581

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85405 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/85406] Unnecessary blend when vectorizing short-cutted calculations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85406 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/85447] [8 Regression] ICE in create_specialized_node, at ipa-cp.c:3870 since r259319

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85447 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug other/85398] g++ reports "array subscript is above array bounds" when it cannot be sure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85398 --- Comment #3 from Thomas De Schampheleire --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > > We could change the warning to have a "may be above array bounds" form > for your case but that wouldn't handle the bar() case. The problem with g

[Bug ipa/85447] [8 Regression] ICE in create_specialized_node, at ipa-cp.c:3870 since r259319

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85447 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Reduced test-case: typedef int a; enum b : a; class c { public: enum { d }; virtual b e(int *, int, const int *) = 0; }; class f : c { b e(int *, int, const int *); b g(); }; b f::e(int *h, int i, con

[Bug rtl-optimization/85409] [8/9 Regression] ICE in alloc_succs_info, at sel-sched-ir.c:4730

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85409 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||deferred Priority|P3

[Bug c++/84611] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE in operator[], at vec.h:826 (local_class_index())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84611 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug rtl-optimization/85412] [8/9 Regression] ICE in put_TImodes, at sel-sched.c:7191

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85412 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||deferred Priority|P3

[Bug ipa/85447] [8 Regression] ICE in create_specialized_node, at ipa-cp.c:3870 since r259319

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85447 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug lto/85422] [openacc] ICE at cfgloop.c:468: segfault in flow_loops_find

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85422 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/85423] [8 Regression] ICE in code_motion_process_successors, at sel-sched.c:6403

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85423 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Recent regression, so P1-ish.

[Bug rtl-optimization/85423] [8 Regression] ICE in code_motion_process_successors, at sel-sched.c:6403

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85423 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > Recent regression, so P1-ish. True, but requires the -fselective-scheduling* -fvar-tracking-assignments combination, which explicitly warns that it doesn't work

[Bug c/85427] ICE in constant_lower_bound, at poly-int.h:1527

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85427 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code CC|

[Bug ipa/85447] [8 Regression] ICE in create_specialized_node, at ipa-cp.c:3870 since r259319

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85447 --- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor --- I guess the best fix is to move the clone-redirecting logic to cgraph::create_clone.

[Bug lto/85422] [openacc] ICE at cfgloop.c:468: segfault in flow_loops_find

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85422 --- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries --- Created attachment 43975 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43975&action=edit libgomp.log

[Bug ipa/85449] New: [8 Regression] Wrong specialization is called in self recursive functions after r259319

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85449 Bug ID: 85449 Summary: [8 Regression] Wrong specialization is called in self recursive functions after r259319 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sev

[Bug lto/85422] [openacc] ICE at cfgloop.c:468: segfault in flow_loops_find

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85422 --- Comment #5 from Tom de Vries --- Created attachment 43976 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43976&action=edit compile.log -save-temps -v output. Contains lto1 invocation.

[Bug c++/85444] asm specifier on typedef silently ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85444 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- For a start, patches go to the mailing list, not in bugzilla :-) https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html

[Bug lto/85422] [openacc] ICE at cfgloop.c:468: segfault in flow_loops_find

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85422 --- Comment #6 from Tom de Vries --- Created attachment 43978 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43978&action=edit configure lines

[Bug ipa/84149] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2017 505.mcf/605.mcf ~10% performance regression with r256888

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84149 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug target/85436] [7 Regression] ICE compiling go code with -mcpu=power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85436 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.4

[Bug c++/85437] [8 Regression] member pointer static upcast rejected in a constexpr context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85437 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Known to work|

[Bug libquadmath/85440] libquadmath and quadmath.h do not exist on ppc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85440 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc64 Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug ipa/85449] [8 Regression] Wrong specialization is called in self recursive functions after r259319

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85449 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/85441] Empty loops not optimised away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85441 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Confirmed with -fsyntax-only, generating code doesn't change things much.

[Bug libstdc++/85442] [8 Regression] cxx11-ios_failure.lo build fails for microblaze

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85442 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Priority|P3

[Bug target/85443] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85443 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target|Xstormy16 |stormy16 --- Comment #1 from Richard Bi

[Bug c++/85444] asm specifier on typedef silently ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85444 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug c++/85444] asm specifier on typedef silently ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85444 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Btw, it could maybe used to adjust mangling... (in C++, that is).

[Bug tree-optimization/85446] [7/8 Regression] wrong-code on riscv64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85446 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Priority|P3

[Bug ipa/85447] [8 Regression] ICE in create_specialized_node, at ipa-cp.c:3870 since r259319

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85447 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug ipa/85449] [8 Regression] Wrong specialization is called in self recursive functions after r259319

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85449 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/85396] _M_t._M_emplace_hint_unique

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85396 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/85447] [8 Regression] ICE in create_specialized_node, at ipa-cp.c:3870 since r259319

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85447 --- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor --- Created attachment 43979 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43979&action=edit Untested WIP fix I have to leave office for a few hours, I'm attaching an untested fix I have so far. I will c

[Bug libstdc++/84442] FAIL: 30_threads/thread/cons/terminate.cc (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84442 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed Apr 18 11:15:38 2018 New Revision: 259463 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259463&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/84442 if _Exit isn't declared then use _exit instead

[Bug libstdc++/84442] FAIL: 30_threads/thread/cons/terminate.cc (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84442 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/85422] [openacc] ICE at cfgloop.c:468: segfault in flow_loops_find

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85422 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug libstdc++/85442] [7/8 Regression] cxx11-ios_failure.lo build fails for microblaze

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85442 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|8.0 |7.4 Summary|[8 Regression]

[Bug c++/85441] Empty loops not optimised away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85441 --- Comment #3 from sebastian321123 at interia dot pl --- I am afraid that nothing changes with optimisation flags. I am getting the same results for -O1, -O2, -O3 and -Os

[Bug lto/85391] [8 Regression] ICE in add_type_duplicate, at ipa-devirt.c:1887

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85391 --- Comment #17 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Wed Apr 18 11:29:26 2018 New Revision: 259464 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259464&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR lto/85391 * lto.c (lto_read_decls): Do not test TYPE_

[Bug libstdc++/85442] [7/8 Regression] cxx11-ios_failure.lo build fails for microblaze

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85442 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/85261] __builtin_arm_set_fpscr ICEs with constant input

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85261 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Preud'homme --- Author: thopre01 Date: Wed Apr 18 11:42:10 2018 New Revision: 259465 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259465&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [ARM] Fix PR85261: ICE with FPSCR setter builtin Instruction patt

[Bug libgcc/85379] Missing ENDBR in __stack_split_initialize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85379 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/85450] New: ICE: invalid types in nop conversion during GIMPLE pass: ompexp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85450 Bug ID: 85450 Summary: ICE: invalid types in nop conversion during GIMPLE pass: ompexp Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: openmp

[Bug middle-end/85450] ICE: invalid types in nop conversion during GIMPLE pass: ompexp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85450 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/85442] [7/8 Regression] cxx11-ios_failure.lo build fails for microblaze

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85442 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed Apr 18 12:14:58 2018 New Revision: 259467 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259467&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/85442 fix duplicate debuginfo for cxx11-ios_failure.cc 2018

[Bug lto/85451] New: [offloading] Improve lto-wrapper error message when not finding mkoffload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85451 Bug ID: 85451 Summary: [offloading] Improve lto-wrapper error message when not finding mkoffload Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhance

[Bug lto/85451] [offloading] Improve lto-wrapper error message when not finding mkoffload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85451 --- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries --- Created attachment 43980 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43980&action=edit Tentative patch

[Bug lto/85451] [offloading] Improve lto-wrapper error message when not finding mkoffload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85451 --- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #1) > Created attachment 43980 [details] > Tentative patch Improved error message: ... $ ./install/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -fopenacc test.c lto-wrapper: fatal error:

[Bug lto/85422] [openacc] ICE at cfgloop.c:468: segfault in flow_loops_find

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85422 --- Comment #8 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #7) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > > flags? A simple ./xgcc -fopenacc doesn't reproduce it. With my GCC 7 > > install I see > > > > lto-wrapper: fata

[Bug lto/85451] [offloading] Improve lto-wrapper error message when not finding mkoffload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85451 --- Comment #3 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #0) > ... > $ ./install/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -fopenacc test.c \ > -B $(pwd > -P)/install/offload-nvptx-none/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/8.0.1 > mkoffload: fa

[Bug lto/85422] [openacc] ICE at cfgloop.c:468: segfault in flow_loops_find

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85422 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/54412] minimal 32-byte stack alignment with -mavx on 64-bit Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54412 Liu Hao changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lh_mouse at 126 dot com --- Comment #21 from L

[Bug libstdc++/85442] [7/8 Regression] cxx11-ios_failure.lo build fails for microblaze

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85442 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed Apr 18 13:13:29 2018 New Revision: 259468 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259468&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/85442 fix duplicate debuginfo for cxx11-ios_failure.cc 2018

[Bug libstdc++/85442] [7/8 Regression] cxx11-ios_failure.lo build fails for microblaze

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85442 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/85261] __builtin_arm_set_fpscr ICEs with constant input

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85261 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Preud'homme --- Author: thopre01 Date: Wed Apr 18 13:17:30 2018 New Revision: 259469 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259469&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [ARM] Fix PR85261: ICE with FPSCR setter builtin Instruction patt

[Bug target/85261] __builtin_arm_set_fpscr ICEs with constant input

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85261 Thomas Preud'homme changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug libstdc++/85439] mt19937_64 producing unexpected result only in certain configuration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85439 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/85220] [meta-bug, nvptx] Run trunk with og7 openacc testcases and analyze execution failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85220 --- Comment #3 from Tom de Vries --- Filed: - PR85221 "[openacc] ICE in install_var_field, at omp-low.c:657" - PR85445 "[nvptx, openacc] Calls to worker and vector routine broken" and updated a few existing PRs. There are lots of execution fai

[Bug c++/61982] Optimizer does not eliminate stores to destroyed objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61982 hyrosen at mail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hyrosen at mail dot com --- Com

[Bug c++/61982] Optimizer does not eliminate stores to destroyed objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61982 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to hyrosen from comment #9) > The storage for an object can still be accessible after the object is > destroyed. Therefore, writes in the destructor should not be eliminated > unless they are prov

[Bug libstdc++/85439] mt19937_64 producing unexpected result only in certain configuration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85439 --- Comment #1 from Marc "Foddex" Oude Kotte --- When one adds std::hex output formatting for the first four std::cout calls, for example the first line would then look like: std::cout << "32 bits gen, uint32_t: " << std::hex << generateRandom()

[Bug demangler/85452] New: Stack-Overflow in nm-new / C++ name demangler (binuitils-2.30-15ubuntu1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85452 Bug ID: 85452 Summary: Stack-Overflow in nm-new / C++ name demangler (binuitils-2.30-15ubuntu1) Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug target/85434] Address of stack protector guard spilled to stack on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85434 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Preud'homme --- (In reply to Wilco from comment #4) > Clearly rematerialization isn't working correctly. Immediates and constant > addresses like this should never be spilled (using MOV/MOVK could increase > codesize, b

[Bug demangler/85453] New: OOM-Bug in cxxfilt / C++ name demangler (binuitils-2.30-15ubuntu1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85453 Bug ID: 85453 Summary: OOM-Bug in cxxfilt / C++ name demangler (binuitils-2.30-15ubuntu1) Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

  1   2   >