https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84770
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
rtran : (reconfigured)
Thread model: posix
gcc version 8.0.1 20180309 (experimental) (GCC)
$ ./cc1 -quiet -m32 -O2 -Wall -W pr84772.c -nostdinc -mcpu=8540
$ ./cc1 -quiet -m32 -O2 -Wall -W pr84772.c -nostdinc -mcpu=8548
No warnings at all in either.
Nor in 7.3.1:
$ ./xgcc -B ./ -v
Reading specs from ./
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84775
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84767
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84776
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84773
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84757
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84729
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
/winnt.c (i386_pe_seh_cold_init): Use small pre-allocation
when the function accesses prior frames.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/20180309-1.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/config/i386/winnt.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84763
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67288
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82965
Paul Hua changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com
--- Comment #12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82352
amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67288
--- Comment #12 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #11)
> But the RTL loop optimizers just notice that the BIV has a step of 16 and
> divides the expression, I think we can't expect those passes to be able to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84404
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Mar 9 09:58:49 2018
New Revision: 258382
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258382&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/84404
* gcc.dg/graphite/pr84404.c: Only compile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Any further progress? E.g. when you've taken away all the -mcpu= options but
2, why not take away all the powerpcspe-cpus.def entries but the two, masks for
other CPUs, etc. Do those CPUs support Altivec o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42414
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084
--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Similarly, config.gcc has:
powerpc*-*-*spe*)
cpu_type=powerpcspe
extra_headers="ppc-asm.h altivec.h spe.h ppu_intrinsics.h paired.h
spu2vmx.h vec_types.h si2vmx.h htmintrin.h htmxlintrin.h"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84777
Bug ID: 84777
Summary: -Os inhibits all vectorization
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80452
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7)
> return std::move(cv);
Thanks! Works for me. Thus backport would not be probably needed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84734
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84777
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82859
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> I suspect that patch to PR 70409 fixed this one as well.
Confirmed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84778
Bug ID: 84778
Summary: Issue with character arguments of specified length
(does not compile)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84778
--- Comment #1 from david.applegate at woodplc dot com ---
This bug does not occur in GCC 4.8.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84777
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Hmm, patch can't help. Instead try the following which should make the omp
simd
case work.
Index: gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ch.c
===
--- gcc/tree-ssa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84777
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
FDO might also help given important loops should show up as hot.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84763
--- Comment #5 from Rainer Emrich ---
binutils 2.19.1 is building fine now.
Bootstrap and complete testsuite run of r258381 in progress. I will send the
results to the gcc-testresults mailing list.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84779
Bug ID: 84779
Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] Compiling
gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/entry_4.f90 with -O1
or -Os and -fdefault-integer-8 gives an ICE
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84779
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67288
--- Comment #13 from Segher Boessenkool ---
This setup code is created *by* the RTL loop optimisers, via
iv_number_of_iterations IIRC. Combine cannot get rid of it because it does
not know the count cannot be 0 (that is info from a different bb)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84777
--- Comment #4 from Allan Jensen ---
I will try the patch. I just tried -fopt-info-vec-missed and the message
reported for every loop was:
note: not vectorized: latch block not empty.
note: bad loop form.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84777
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 9 Mar 2018, linux at carewolf dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84777
>
> --- Comment #4 from Allan Jensen ---
> I will try the patch. I just tried -fopt-info
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84777
--- Comment #6 from Allan Jensen ---
Great. Your patch worked with 90% of the marked loops!
The remaining report things like this with -fopt-info-vec-missed:
note: not vectorized: relevant stmt not supported: idisty.872_437 = (unsigned
int) idi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84733
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Created attachment 43603
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43603&action=edit
A simpler testcase. This triggers the pop_local_binding ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84777
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 9 Mar 2018, linux at carewolf dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84777
>
> --- Comment #6 from Allan Jensen ---
> Great. Your patch worked with 90% of the mark
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84733
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Fri Mar 9 12:13:55 2018
New Revision: 258383
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258383&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR c++/84733] ICE in check-local-shadow
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-pat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84733
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|nathan at gcc do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84767
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84780
Bug ID: 84780
Summary: [8 Regression] wrong code aarch64 with -O3
--param=tree-reassoc-width=32
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84780
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84777
--- Comment #8 from Allan Jensen ---
Yes, those I say are missing are compared to -O2. I was investigating this in
relation to Qt. We either build these files with -O3, or with -Os for customer
that are binary size sensitive. Since some of the im
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84781
Bug ID: 84781
Summary: [missed optimization] ignore bitmask after movemask
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84777
--- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 9 Mar 2018, linux at carewolf dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84777
>
> --- Comment #8 from Allan Jensen ---
> Yes, those I say are missing are compared to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84178
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Mar 9 13:29:39 2018
New Revision: 258387
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258387&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-09 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/84775
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84775
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Mar 9 13:29:39 2018
New Revision: 258387
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258387&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-09 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/84775
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84178
Bug 84178 depends on bug 84775, which changed state.
Bug 84775 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3: in
check_loop_closed_ssa_def, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:709
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84775
What|Re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84775
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84782
Bug ID: 84782
Summary: Rejects a maybe C++ code snippet
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84780
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58150
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84783
Bug ID: 84783
Summary: Missing _mm256_permutexvar_epi64() intrinsic for
AVX512VL
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84780
--- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fails for me with -O2 --param=tree-reassoc-width=4.
With -fno-if-conversion it doesn't fail but I don't see what the if-conversion
passes do wrong, if anything
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84784
Bug ID: 84784
Summary: ICEs: verify_gimple failed with -fdefault-integer-8
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84784
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84785
Bug ID: 84785
Summary: internal compiler error: unexpected expression ‘I’ of
kind template_parm_index
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84785
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84785
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek ---
Started with r258039.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84780
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84772
--- Comment #2 from Zack Weinberg ---
You don't appear to have the exact same build as me. But there's something
fishy going on with that, because as far as I can tell, SVN rev 258338 is a
*trunk* revision, not a gcc-7-branch revision.
Anyway,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84772
--- Comment #3 from Zack Weinberg ---
Created attachment 43607
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43607&action=edit
-fdump-tree-stdarg output for test case from problem compiler
I do not entirely understand how to read this (wh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64089
--- Comment #16 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Fri Mar 9 15:24:44 2018
New Revision: 258388
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258388&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
jit: use 'configure' to replace hard-coded linker options (PR jit/6408
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84288
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Fri Mar 9 15:24:44 2018
New Revision: 258388
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258388&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
jit: use 'configure' to replace hard-coded linker options (PR jit/64089
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64089
--- Comment #17 from David Malcolm ---
This ought to be fixed in trunk (for gcc 8) by r258388.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84288
--- Comment #6 from David Malcolm ---
I'm not sure if r258388 fixes the linker issue on Solaris, but it should make
it much easier to fix; e.g. to apply your patch here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-02/msg00835.html
(currently report
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83193
--- Comment #15 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Fri Mar 9 15:42:10 2018
New Revision: 258389
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258389&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[arm] PR target/83193: Do not print arch/cpu hints twice
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64089
--- Comment #18 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Thanks David. Do you think this could be backported to the active branches?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83193
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.0 |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84772
--- Comment #4 from Zack Weinberg ---
The last actual _change_ in my GCC build is
r258315 | denisc | 2018-03-07 04:13:12 -0500 (Wed, 07 Mar 2018) | 9 lines
Backport from mainline
2018-02-07 Georg-Johann Lay
PR target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83712
--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri Mar 9 16:00:36 2018
New Revision: 258390
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258390&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-09 Vladimir Makarov
PR target/83712
* lr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84786
Bug ID: 84786
Summary: [miscompilation] vunpcklpd accessing xmm16-22
targeting KNL
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84787
Bug ID: 84787
Summary: ICEs: in decompose, at wide-int.h:933 with
-default-integer-8
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84772
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84787
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84772
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Ah, I can actually reproduce it with additional -mlong-double-128, both in 7.3
and on the trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84757
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> Started with r244942. Vlad, can you please have a look? Thanks.
Sure, I'll look at this. Some analysis will be ready today.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84786
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81827
Luke Robison changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||robison at arlut dot utexas.edu
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84780
--- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
A carry-setting instruction gets deleted. Among the disassembly the non-failing
assembly has this:
cmp x13, 0
asr w0, w0, w4
csetw4, ne
sxtwx0, w0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84772
--- Comment #7 from Zack Weinberg ---
I no longer remember enough about GIMPLE to comment on your actual proposed
fix, but I do have a small nitpick on the test case:
+va_arg (ap, long double); /* { dg-bogus "may be used
uni
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84724
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Mar 9 18:01:22 2018
New Revision: 258391
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258391&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84724
* decl.c (duplicate_decls): Don't override __
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84724
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84788
Bug ID: 84788
Summary: Parenthesis changes a constant to non-constant
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84778
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82859
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84734
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|6.4.0, 7.3.0|
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83789
--- Comment #13 from Peter Bergner ---
Ok, I have a patch that eliminates the duplicate patterns and greatly
simplifies the code that calls these patterns. I'm testing it now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84734
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> I've removed the "known to work" entries
> as I get failures on FreeBSD.
What failures?
With 6.4.0 or 7.3.0 I get the same errors as with r257970.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84734
--- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl ---
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 06:28:24PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84734
>
> --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> > I've removed the "known to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84682
--- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Fri Mar 9 18:50:56 2018
New Revision: 258393
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258393&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/84682
* lra-constraints.c (process_addr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84682
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
Summar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84526
--- Comment #11 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Fri Mar 9 19:06:26 2018
New Revision: 258394
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258394&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR tree-optimization/84526
* gimple-ssa-wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84526
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84767
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Mar 9 19:12:29 2018
New Revision: 258395
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258395&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84767
* tree-inline.c (copy_tree_body_r): For INDIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84767
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] ICE with |[6/7 Regression] ICE with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84785
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84734
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> On 6, ...
If it is after r257972 for gcc7 and r257974 for gcc6, then it does not
contradicts the fact that the errors are emitted for 6.4.0 or 7.3.0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84789
Bug ID: 84789
Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with broken variable
declaration in template class
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84790
Bug ID: 84790
Summary: Miscompilation for MIPS16 with -fpic and -Os or -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84791
Bug ID: 84791
Summary: ICE with broken OpenMP reduction clause
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: error-recovery, ice-on-invalid-code, openmp
Severit
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
