https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84190
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37239
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2008-08-27 11:58:09 |2018-2-16
--- Comment #7 from Richard B
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84399
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84399
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Feb 16 08:16:17 2018
New Revision: 257723
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257723&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-16 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/84399
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81443
--- Comment #23 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Feb 16 08:20:32 2018
New Revision: 257724
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257724&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/81443
* rtlanal.c (num_sign_bit_c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84416
Bug ID: 84416
Summary: internal compiler error: in int_cst_value, at
tree.c:11089
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81443
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518
--- Comment #43 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Wilco from comment #42)
> Cut down example:
>
> typedef struct { int x, y; } X;
>
> void f (X *p, int n)
> {
> for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)
> { p[i].x = i;
> p[i].y = i + 1;
> }
> }
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84415
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83791
--- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries ---
Approved here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-02/msg00920.html .
Will commit in stage1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84417
Bug ID: 84417
Summary: internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84414
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||alias, wrong-code
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84408
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||aarch64
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70920
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84417
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84417
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83723
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Feb 16 09:04:00 2018
New Revision: 257725
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257725&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/83723
* lra-int.h (lra_substitute_pseu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84405
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Feb 16 09:05:35 2018
New Revision: 257726
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257726&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/84405
* system.h (BROKEN_VALUE_INITIALIZATION
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83723
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82939
Bug 82939 depends on bug 84405, which changed state.
Bug 84405 Summary: [8 Regression] Fails to bootstrap with GCC 4.1.2, GCC 4.2.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84405
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84405
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84402
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #43432|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84402
--- Comment #13 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 43440
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43440&action=edit
Parallel build of make all-host on 128 core EPYC machine
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84272
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Feb 16 09:26:27 2018
New Revision: 257727
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257727&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/84272
* config/aarch64/cortex-a57-fma-steering.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84272
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64081
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.0 |9.0
--- Comment #63 from Aldy Hernandez
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84416
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84406
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84412
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84418
Bug ID: 84418
Summary: ICE with fortran OpenMP linear (ref ()) clause
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fort
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84418
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84307
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Feb 16 10:03:47 2018
New Revision: 257729
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257729&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Set proper internal functions fnspec (PR sanitizer/84307).
2018-02-16 Ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70897
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84239
--- Comment #3 from itsimbal at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: itsimbal
Date: Fri Feb 16 10:19:14 2018
New Revision: 257730
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257730&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Additional fix for PR 84239.
PR target/84239
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82428
--- Comment #6 from Tom de Vries ---
Approved for stage1 here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-01/msg01576.html
Version to commit: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-01/msg01630.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84419
Bug ID: 84419
Summary: [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2017/CPU2006 521/621, 527/627,
554/654, 445, 454, 481, 416 runfails after r256628
with march=skylake-avx512
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84419
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |8.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84419
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82278
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.0 |9.0
race with any bug report.
See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions.
$ g++ --version
g++ (GCC) 8.0.1 20180216 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84420
--- Comment #1 from Benjamin Buch ---
Same with:
int main(){
[]{
int a[1]{};
auto [v] = a;
(void)v;
}();
}
$ g++ -std=c++17 main.cpp
main.cpp: In lambda fun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84420
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84420
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84420
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Started with r253265.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82989
sudi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84418
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 43441
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43441&action=edit
gcc8-pr84418.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82229
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84408
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84417
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Feb 16 12:01:23 2018
New Revision: 257731
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257731&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-16 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/84417
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84417
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82939
--- Comment #17 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Feb 16 12:02:34 2018
New Revision: 257732
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257732&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-16 Richard Biener
PR bootstrap/82939
* lin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82939
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84408
--- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Created attachment 43442
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43442&action=edit
preprocessed testcase
Nevermind, .ii file generated on gcc116.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84408
--- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez ---
I can't reproduce on gcc116.fsffrance.org. The assembler completes in less
than a second for both -gno-inline-points and without.
aldyh@gcc116:~/bld/t/gcc$ ./xg++ -B. -g -O -fPIC -shared -fno-rtti -time
po
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518
--- Comment #44 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Maybe -O3 -mcpu=cortex-a9 -mfpu=neon-fp16 -mfloat-abi=hard is needed.
With that I certainly see the #c42 loop vectorized.
On x86_64 we get in *.optimized:
[local count: 567644349]:
# vect_vec_iv_.4_33
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518
--- Comment #45 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Note the vectorized loop is pretty much the same on arm little-endian,
# vect_vec_iv_.6_33 = PHI <{ 0, 1, 2, 3 }(4), vect_vec_iv_.6_34(5)>
# ivtmp.12_14 = PHI
vectp_p.8_37 = (int[8] *) ivtmp.12_14;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518
--- Comment #46 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Wonder if that:
vect_array.11[0] = vect_vec_iv_.7_45;
vect_array.11[1] = vect__4.8_48;
on armeb shouldn't have been [1] and [0] instead, otherwise we end up with:
(insn 35 37 38 5 (set (subreg:V4SI (reg:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84286
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Good, building the problem with -O0, I see very many -Wabi warnings:
https://pastebin.com/bZFRJycS
That can probably explain why it fails, right?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16166
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Created attachment 43443
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43443&action=edit
Patch to split -Weffc++ into separate options.
This adds several new warning options to replace -Weffc++, an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518
--- Comment #47 from Wilco ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #46)
> Wonder if that:
> vect_array.11[0] = vect_vec_iv_.7_45;
> vect_array.11[1] = vect__4.8_48;
> on armeb shouldn't have been [1] and [0] instead, otherwise we end up
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84037
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84037
--- Comment #33 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Feb 16 13:47:25 2018
New Revision: 257734
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257734&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-16 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/84037
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84016
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
The gamess regression mentioned should be fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82862
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Feb 16 13:47:25 2018
New Revision: 257734
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257734&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-16 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/84037
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84016
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Feb 16 13:47:25 2018
New Revision: 257734
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257734&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-16 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/84037
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82862
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #7 from Richard Bie
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82764
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84420
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83831
--- Comment #5 from Oleg Endo ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Fri Feb 16 13:52:49 2018
New Revision: 257735
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257735&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/83831
* config/rx/rx.c (rx_fuse_in_memory_bi
){} };
A a;
f(a);
}
$ g++ -std=c++17 main.cpp
main.cpp: In lambda function:
main.cpp:6:40: error: 'v' is not a constant expression
auto f = [](auto v){ if constexpr(v){} };
^
$ g++ --version
g++ (GCC) 8.0.1 20180216 (experimental)
Copyrigh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84419
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Nesterovskiy ---
I've made a quite small reproducer:
---
$ cat reproducer.c
#include
#include
#define SIZE 400
int foo[SIZE];
char bar[SIZE];
void __attribute__ ((noinline)) foo_func(void)
{
int i;
for (i =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84421
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84286
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83227
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 16 14:12:48 2018
New Revision: 257738
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257738&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/83227 - C++17 ICE with init-list derived-to-base conversion
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84045
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 16 14:12:42 2018
New Revision: 257737
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257737&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84045 - ICE with typedef and noexcept.
* except.c (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84045
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83227
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84286
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-reduction
--- Comment #6 from Mare
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84286
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #6)
> We'll need to bisect on the .o level. I see no -Wabi=11 warnings though.
It's here to be seen: https://pastebin.com/bZFRJycS
As mentioned visible only with -O0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84375
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Fri Feb 16 14:30:55 2018
New Revision: 257739
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257739&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR c++/84375] Fix ICE after bad friend
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84375
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12944
Bug 12944 depends on bug 84375, which changed state.
Bug 84375 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE with friend in local class
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84375
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84413
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||igor.v.tsimbalist at intel dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82764
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill ---
Moving b out of the function reproduces the bug on x86_64 as well:
struct Empty {};
struct Empty2 : Empty {};
struct A : Empty2
{
int x {1};
int y {2};
};
struct B
{
A a {};
};
B b;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82491
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdsandiford at googlemail dot
com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83375
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83023
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84107
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83200
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82278
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37239
--- Comment #8 from Michael Matz ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7)
> While hmmer is now split the testcase in this bug isn't. We do find some
> split points but appearantly never split the loop.
This is not a case for normal loop
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83392
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84381
--- Comment #5 from Neil Carlson ---
Thomas, I saw you generated a patch with "stop n". I'd love to see how you did
it -- the regexp and counting magic.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84114
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilco.dijkstra at arm dot com
--- Comment #5 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84421
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82468
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Feb 16 15:34:58 2018
New Revision: 257740
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257740&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2018-02-16 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/82468
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82468
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[7/8 Regression] ICE with |[7 Regression] ICE with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82096
--- Comment #11 from sudi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sudi
Date: Fri Feb 16 15:37:35 2018
New Revision: 257741
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257741&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix emit_store_flag_force () function to fix ICE in int_mode_for_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84421
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> Is that really a rejects-valid
Yes, bool(v) is a constant-expression.
1 - 100 of 197 matches
Mail list logo
