https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84257
Bug ID: 84257
Summary: Extremely slow compilation from gcc source code under
macOS 10.13
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84235
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 7 08:29:58 2018
New Revision: 257437
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257437&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/84235
* tree-ssa-scopedtables.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84241
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu |powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84258
Bug ID: 84258
Summary: Bogus -Wformat warning "wide character string" for
const unsigned char
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83008
--- Comment #35 from Christophe Lyon ---
Author: clyon
Date: Wed Feb 7 09:12:48 2018
New Revision: 257438
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257438&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[testsuite] Fix gcc.dg/cse_recip.c for AArch64 after r257181.
2018-02-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84231
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84258
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Should most likely say the format is not of an array of char type. Note I bet
it will also warn about signed char too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84257
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|other |bootstrap
Host|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84258
--- Comment #2 from w.steinwender at freenet dot de ---
Yes, same warning for signed char.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84257
--- Comment #2 from 191919 <191919 at gmail dot com> ---
I tried with the combination of the following settings under macOS 10.13.3:
internal SSD / external HD
HFS+ / APFS
SIP enabled / SIP disabled
The only factor that affects is SIP status. On
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84065
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71662
--- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Feb 7 09:35:10 2018
New Revision: 257439
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257439&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-07 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/71662
* g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83846
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83845
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83530
--- Comment #8 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
(In reply to Pat Haugen from comment #7)
> Assuming this is a latent selective scheduling bug since I can reproduce
> with r243865 by adding -fsched-pressure --param sched-pressure-algorithm=2.
> Looking
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84209
--- Comment #2 from denisc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: denisc
Date: Wed Feb 7 09:59:52 2018
New Revision: 257440
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257440&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/84209
* config/avr/avr.h (GENERAL_RE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518
--- Comment #31 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 43352
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43352&action=edit
Reduced testcase
I commented out most calls, since abort() is called from csub4.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518
--- Comment #32 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 43353
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43353&action=edit
assembly for arm (little-endian)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518
--- Comment #33 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 43354
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43354&action=edit
assembly for armeb (big-endian)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518
--- Comment #34 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 43355
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43355&action=edit
execution traces for arm
I have removed the logs/traces for -O1/-O2/-Os/etc... and kept only -O3 -g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518
--- Comment #35 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 43356
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43356&action=edit
execution traces for armeb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518
--- Comment #36 from Christophe Lyon ---
The attachments were generated with trunk r257076
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84204
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84205
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84223
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Feb 7 10:14:25 2018
New Revision: 257441
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257441&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-07 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/84204
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84205
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Feb 7 10:14:25 2018
New Revision: 257441
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257441&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-07 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/84204
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84204
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Feb 7 10:14:25 2018
New Revision: 257441
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257441&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-07 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/84204
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84223
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
libitm
// gcc version 8.0.1 20180207 (experimental) [trunk revision 257435] (Debian
8-20180207-1)
//
// In file included from
/home/packages/gcc/8/gcc-8-8-20180207/build/gcc/include/x86intrin.h:27,
// from ../../../src/libitm/config/x86/target.h:26,
// from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518
--- Comment #37 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #31)
> Created attachment 43352 [details]
> Reduced testcase
>
> I commented out most calls, since abort() is called from csub4.
Can you also remove the csub8, is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84259
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose ---
$ cat aatree.ii
#pragma GCC target "sse4.2"
(sid)doko@x1:/home/packages/gcc/8/gcc-8-8-20180207$ build/gcc/xg++ -Bbuild/gcc/
-mrtm -mcet -std=gnu++11 -fcf-protection=full -funwind-tables -fno-excep
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84231
--- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva ---
The difference arises because, when resolving the % overload in
normal_function, the result operands of the ternary operator have gained
rvalue-forcing NOP_EXPRs, which makes their lvalue_kind clk_none, so
#2 from Matthias Klose ---
// Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
// Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Debian 8-20180207-1'
--with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-8/README.Bugs
--enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --prefix=/usr
--with-gcc-major-ve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84260
Bug ID: 84260
Summary: gcc for mips produces an error when called with
--help=
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84217
--- Comment #5 from Tom de Vries ---
Author: vries
Date: Wed Feb 7 10:37:55 2018
New Revision: 257443
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257443&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[openacc] Fix diff_type in expand_oacc_collapse_init
2018-02-07 Tom de Vr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84241
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hubicka at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84241
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
It would help if someone can build the testcase with --save-temps and attach
the *.res file. Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84244
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84245
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84248
--- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Feb 7 10:48:39 2018
New Revision: 257444
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257444&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
i386: Mask out the CF_SET bit for -fcf-protection check
Since ix86
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84212
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Wstringop-overflow
C ObjC C++ ObjC++ Warning Alias(Wstringop-overflow=, 2, 0)
Warn about buffer overflow in string manipulation functions like memcpy
and strcpy.
LTO is missing in the list of supported FEs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84243
--- Comment #11 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Feb 7 10:49:53 2018
New Revision: 257445
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257445&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Use -fcf-protection=return in cet-intrin-4.c
Since -fcf-protectio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84246
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84213
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84214
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84219
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84259
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||itsimbal at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84217
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Component|libgomp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84222
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |8.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84221
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84259
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84248
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from H.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84224
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84226
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |8.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84227
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |8.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84217
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So fixed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84173
--- Comment #12 from Javier Serrano Polo
---
Created attachment 43357
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43357&action=edit
Initial support for multiarch interpreters
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #11)
> If you intend t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84229
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84217
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84229
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka ---
> Huh, __builtin_va_arg_pack_len is only valid within varargs functions. The
> difference seems to be that without LTO we simply emit a library call and
> not emit aa.i:open (which is invalid) but with LTO we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84261
Bug ID: 84261
Summary: gcc fails to call a simd-vectorized function
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84232
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84262
Bug ID: 84262
Summary: Header file initialization of a static constant causes
linker error if code is compiled without optimization
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84233
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84234
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization, openmp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84235
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84241
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84240
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84245
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84234
--- Comment #2 from Florian Lemaitre ---
Well, I should mention that using __attribute((simd)) also has the issue.
So I don't think the problem lies in OpenMP front end.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84251
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84262
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84234
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The forward declaration is not ignored, but you either need to use #pragma omp
simd on the loop you want to vectorize, or tell the compiler your function
doesn't have any side-effects that would prevent auto-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84261
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84250
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84261
--- Comment #2 from Marcin Krotkiewski ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> This is because reduction operations like 'exp' are not supported. Also
> vectorization of loops with using vectors isn't supported.
>
> So not sure what
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63311
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
Please leave the bug open - it does point at an undesirable transform which
would conflict with GCC ever treating the use of uninitialized vars as "more"
undefined as it does right now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84234
--- Comment #4 from Florian Lemaitre ---
Ah... ok. I understand.
Indeed, declaring the function const works as expected.
So, I guess we can say it is not a bug, and close the bug report?
However, I really think this should be documented somewhe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84252
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84262
--- Comment #2 from Serguei Kolos ---
If you read my original message through the end you should have noticed that I
have admitted that already. My question was different:
Is it normal that the same code (seemingly bogus) compiles fine with opti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84261
--- Comment #3 from Marcin Krotkiewski ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Also vectorization of loops with using vectors isn't supported.
Not sure what you mean. If instead of a function call I do some floating point
computations
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84234
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
#pragma omp declare simd or simd attribute say that on the definition compiler
should create alternate entry point(s) for the vectorized variants, and on
declarations that on the definition they were created,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84262
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Serguei Kolos from comment #0)
> According to the article 9.4.2/4 of the C++ standard the code is probably
> missing definitions of the c1, c2 and c3 constants:
>
> "If a static data member is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84262
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Serguei Kolos from comment #2)
> If you read my original message through the end you should have noticed that
> I have admitted that already. My question was different:
>
> Is it normal that t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84234
--- Comment #6 from Florian Lemaitre ---
I want auto-vectorization, not guided vectorization.
Basically, I try to write a fast RSQRT that will not break auto vectorization,
and this will be integrated in a large scale project where it is easy to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82210
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82210
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 7 Feb 2018, aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82210
>
> Aldy Hernandez changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82210
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
This changed with r146817, so I'd look at a problem in expansion rather than
much earlier. DECL_SIZE_UNIT should match what sizeof is, so you can't just
change it at will, it is part of the ABI. Arrays of o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84263
Bug ID: 84263
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in lookup_page_table_entry at
gcc/ggc-page.c:646 on valid C++ code
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
K
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84263
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82210
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The difference with that revision is:
addq$2, %rax
cmpq%rcx, %rax
jne .L3
- leaq(%r12,%rdx), %rdx
+ andq$-16, %rdx
xorl%eax, %eax
+ le
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84264
Bug ID: 84264
Summary: ICE in rs6000_emit_le_vsx_store, at
config/rs6000/rs6000.c:10367
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84263
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82210
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Though, in e.g. *.ehcleanup2 dump we still have:
pretmp.25_64 = D.1613_19 /[ex] 16;
D.2749_73 = &s.2_61->b{off: pretmp.25_64 * 16}[0];
ivtmp.35_86 = (long unsigned int) D.2749_73;
both before and after
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518
--- Comment #38 from Christophe Lyon ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #37)
> (In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #31)
> > Created attachment 43352 [details]
> > Reduced testcase
> >
> > I commented out most calls, since abort()
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518
--- Comment #39 from Christophe Lyon ---
Maybe we can demote this from P1?
I'm sure armeb is getting a lot of attention, given other bug reports.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84263
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Martin has confirmed i686 host & target. (not just target)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84265
Bug ID: 84265
Summary: ICE in vect_permute_load_chain, at
tree-vect-data-refs.c:5933
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84265
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84252
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 43358
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43358&action=edit
gcc8-pr84252.patch
Full untested fix.
1 - 100 of 177 matches
Mail list logo
