[Bug c++/83978] [8 Regression] ICE in determine_visibility

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83978 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug gcov-profile/83879] __gcov_dump doesn't work with dlopen-ed libraries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83879 --- Comment #4 from Marco Castelluccio --- Would it be feasible to force exporting "__gcov_master" to the dynamic symbol table when coverage instrumentation is enabled?

[Bug gcov-profile/83879] __gcov_dump doesn't work with dlopen-ed libraries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83879 --- Comment #5 from Nathan Sidwell --- usage is --dynamic-list=file-name, which would be a little awkward. --dynamic-list-data is probably more useable and available.

[Bug c++/83978] [8 Regression] ICE in determine_visibility

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83978 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/82882] [8 regression] ICE Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82882 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- *** Bug 83978 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug target/83862] powerpc: ICE in signbit testcase

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83862 --- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner --- Author: meissner Date: Mon Jan 22 19:36:18 2018 New Revision: 256959 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256959&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [gcc] 2018-01-22 Michael Meissner PR target/83862

[Bug target/81616] Update -mtune=generic for the current Intel and AMD processors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81616 --- Comment #49 from Jan Hubicka --- > matrix.c is still needing additional options to get the best out of the Ryzen > processor. But is better than before (223029 clocks vs 371978 originally), > but 122677 is achievable with the right options.

[Bug target/83969] [8 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2997 (error: could not split insn) for powerpc targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83969 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/83969] [8 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2997 (error: could not split insn) for powerpc targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83969 --- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool --- Where do you get TImode with this testcase?

[Bug target/83969] [8 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2997 (error: could not split insn) for powerpc targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83969 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Apparently vectorization, from expand dump it looks like TImode is mode of vector(2) long long int.

[Bug target/83969] [8 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2997 (error: could not split insn) for powerpc targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83969 --- Comment #4 from Michael Meissner --- On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 08:13:11PM +, segher at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83969 > > --- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool --- > Where do you get TImode wi

[Bug target/83969] [8 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2997 (error: could not split insn) for powerpc targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83969 --- Comment #5 from Michael Meissner --- On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 08:13:11PM +, segher at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83969 > > --- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool --- > Where do you get TImode wi

[Bug lto/83967] LTO removes C functions declared as weak in assembler(depending on files order in linking)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83967 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On January 22, 2018 4:36:00 PM GMT+01:00, "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83967 > >--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- >Also I was going to say

[Bug tree-optimization/69452] [6 Regression] gcc ICE at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in with verify_ssa failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69452 --- Comment #7 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Mon Jan 22 20:53:57 2018 New Revision: 256963 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256963&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Finish removing class move_computations_dom_walker r232820 (aka 2c7b2f

[Bug c++/83979] New: [8 Regression] ICE with pointer comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83979 Bug ID: 83979 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE with pointer comparison Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal Pri

[Bug c++/83974] [8 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_constant_expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83974 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/83979] [8 Regression] ICE with pointer comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83979 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/83720] [8 Regression] ICE: in mangle_decl, at cp/mangle.c:3847

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83720 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Jan 22 21:51:53 2018 New Revision: 256964 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256964&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/83720 - ICE with lambda and LTO. * decl2.c (determ

[Bug fortran/83976] ICE in gfc_add_component_ref, at fortran/class.c:211

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83976 Harald Anlauf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gmx dot de --- Comment #2 from

[Bug c++/83979] [8 Regression] ICE with pointer comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83979 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/83515] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83515 --- Comment #2 from DIL --- For GFORTRAN 6.4.0 and earlier, the relevant compiler bug has been fixed in 78300.

[Bug c++/83979] [8 Regression] ICE with pointer comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83979 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assigne

[Bug fortran/83980] New: Various issues with character length in array constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83980 Bug ID: 83980 Summary: Various issues with character length in array constructors Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug lto/83720] [8 Regression] ICE: in mangle_decl, at cp/mangle.c:3847

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83720 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Jan 22 22:41:48 2018 New Revision: 256965 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256965&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/83720 - different fix * decl2.c (determine_visibil

[Bug tree-optimization/83957] ICE: Segmentation fault (in gimple_phi_arg)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83957 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Jan 22 23:00:50 2018 New Revision: 256967 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256967&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/83957 * omp-expand.c (expand_omp_for_

[Bug tree-optimization/83081] [8 regression][arm] gcc.dg/pr80218.c fails since r254888

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83081 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Jan 22 22:59:33 2018 New Revision: 256966 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256966&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/83081 * profile-count.h (profile_pro

[Bug tree-optimization/83081] [8 regression][arm] gcc.dg/pr80218.c fails since r254888

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83081 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/83957] ICE: Segmentation fault (in gimple_phi_arg)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83957 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/83981] New: vector::resize(size_type) should not require T to be CopyInsertable when std=c++14

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83981 Bug ID: 83981 Summary: vector::resize(size_type) should not require T to be CopyInsertable when std=c++14 Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug libstdc++/83982] New: Exception guarantee of C++14 vector::resize(size_type) is not met

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83982 Bug ID: 83982 Summary: Exception guarantee of C++14 vector::resize(size_type) is not met Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/83980] Various issues with character length in array constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83980 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug libgomp/83589] [nvptx] mode-transitions.c and private-variables.{c,f90} execution FAILs at GOMP_NVPTX_JIT=-O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83589 --- Comment #8 from Tom de Vries --- Created attachment 43209 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43209&action=edit Patch inserting fake_nop only in case of branch-around-nothing

[Bug libstdc++/83981] vector::resize(size_type) should not require T to be CopyInsertable when std=c++14

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83981 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|UNCON

[Bug lto/83983] New: FAIL: g++.dg/lto/pr83121 (test for LTO warnings, pr83121_0.C line 8)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83983 Bug ID: 83983 Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/lto/pr83121 (test for LTO warnings, pr83121_0.C line 8) Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/83981] vector::resize(size_type) should not require T to be CopyInsertable when std=c++14

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83981 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- https://wg21.link/lwg2033 changed the requirements.

[Bug libstdc++/83982] Exception guarantee of C++14 vector::resize(size_type) is not met

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83982 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/83660] ICE with vec_extract inside expression statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83660 --- Comment #6 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org --- For what it's worth, I reconfigured my build with --enable-checking=yes,tree in hopes that this would help us find the C++ parser code that is responsible for creating the problematic syntax tree.

[Bug fortran/83975] [8 Regression] ICE in set_parm_default_def_partition, at tree-ssa-coalesce.c:1919

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83975 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Status|UNC

[Bug testsuite/83984] New: ld: The value 0x8000000000005 does not fit when applying the relocation DIR21L

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83984 Bug ID: 83984 Summary: ld: The value 0x80005 does not fit when applying the relocation DIR21L Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug target/83985] New: Compile time hog for 32-bit BE powerpc targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83985 Bug ID: 83985 Summary: Compile time hog for 32-bit BE powerpc targets Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: compile-time-hog Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/83975] [8 Regression] ICE in set_parm_default_def_partition, at tree-ssa-coalesce.c:1919

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83975 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Known to work|

[Bug target/83496] MIPS BE: wrong code generates under "-Os -mbranch-cost=1"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496 --- Comment #11 from Paul Hua --- > > Actually, I think that assembly looks unaffected by the issue. > Right. > I have some doubts about the commits mentioned in this thread as well. > r240965 looks like it simply changes the code generator

[Bug target/81616] Update -mtune=generic for the current Intel and AMD processors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81616 --- Comment #50 from Andrew Roberts --- with the matrix.c benchmark on Ryzen and looking at the other options when using -march=znver1 and -mtune=znver1 mult took 225281 clocks -march=znver1 -mtune=znver1 -mprefer-vector-width=128 mult took 1859

[Bug target/83986] New: [8 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2348

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83986 Bug ID: 83986 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2348 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-

[Bug tree-optimization/83821] local aggregate initialization defeats strlen optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83821 Leslie Zhai changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lesliezhai at llvm dot org.cn --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/71304] missing strlen optimizations after string truncation by assigning NUL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71304 Leslie Zhai changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lesliezhai at llvm dot org.cn --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/83190] missing strlen optimization of the empty string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83190 Leslie Zhai changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lesliezhai at llvm dot org.cn --- Comment

[Bug lto/83987] New: [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with OpenMP, sanitizer and virtual bases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83987 Bug ID: 83987 Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with OpenMP, sanitizer and virtual bases Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code

[Bug c++/83918] [8 Regression][c++17] ICE on constexpr eval of datatype involving function and variadic template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83918 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 23 07:46:05 2018 New Revision: 256972 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256972&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/83918 * tree.c (maybe_wrap_with_location): Use NON_

[Bug c++/83918] [8 Regression][c++17] ICE on constexpr eval of datatype involving function and variadic template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83918 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

<    1   2