https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80463
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Seems this doesn't ICE starting with r248863, so it likely just went latent.
Maybe we should just error out on selective scheduling and explicit
-fvar-tracking-assignments or -gstatement-frontiers, this sched
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29651
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jb at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83804
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jan 15 08:57:28 2018
New Revision: 256685
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256685&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-01-15 Richard Biener
PR lto/83804
* tree.c (fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82694
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jan 15 09:05:59 2018
New Revision: 256686
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256686&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/82694
* common.opt (fstrict-overflow): No l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83816
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83817
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83823
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83824
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83826
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83844
Bug ID: 83844
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE with warn_if_not_aligned attribute
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83824
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P4 |P2
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83827
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83828
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83831
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83834
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*
Target Milestone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83837
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83839
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83836
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83843
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83844
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83845
Bug ID: 83845
Summary: [8 regression] new failures after r256620
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83844
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83837
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65345
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83846
Bug ID: 83846
Summary: -mabi=ilp32New test aarch64/sve/while_4.c fails on
aarch64
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83729
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Component|middle-en
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54011
Dennis Lubert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83801
--- Comment #13 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
*** Bug 83729 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83838
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
> There are
>
> /* Only recent versions of Solaris 11 ld properly support hidden .gnu.linkonce
>sections, so don't use them. */
> #ifndef USE_GLD
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83729
--- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Jan 15 10:04:32 2018
New Revision: 256687
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256687&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/83801
PR c/83729
* gcc.target/avr/torture/pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83847
Bug ID: 83847
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in vectorizable_load, at
tree-vect-stmts.c:7365
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-val
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83801
--- Comment #14 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Jan 15 10:04:32 2018
New Revision: 256687
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256687&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/83801
PR c/83729
* gcc.target/avr/torture/p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83848
Bug ID: 83848
Summary: New failures on aarch64 -mabi=ilp32 after r256628
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80463
--- Comment #10 from Arseny Solokha ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9)
> Seems this doesn't ICE starting with r248863, so it likely just went latent.
I've seen ICEs in code_motion_process_successors() or bb_note() recently, will
try
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83849
Bug ID: 83849
Summary: New failures on aarch64 -mabi=ilp32 after r256629
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83850
Bug ID: 83850
Summary: [8 Regression] Spills on vector extract,
gcc.target/i386/pr80846-1.c FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83850
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83804
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 43127
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43127&action=edit
-fmem-report-wpa for Inkscape with -O2 for GCC 6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83804
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 43128
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43128&action=edit
CPU & memory consumption for Inkscape with GCC 6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83851
Bug ID: 83851
Summary: [8 regression] gcc.dg/vect/pr53185-2.c fails on armeb
after r256634
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80846
--- Comment #26 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Peter Cordes from comment #25)
> We're getting a spill/reload inside the loop with AVX512:
>
> .L2:
> vmovdqa64 (%esp), %zmm3
> vpaddd (%eax), %zmm3, %zmm2
> addl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 80846, which changed state.
Bug 80846 Summary: auto-vectorized AVX2 horizontal sum should narrow to 128b
right away, to be more efficient for Ryzen and Intel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80846
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80846
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83847
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83836
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83839
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83843
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Started with my r254948.
Debugging...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83651
--- Comment #2 from Arnd Bergmann ---
My kernel patch to use -Os got merged, but caused a regression, so I kept
experimenting with the libressl implementation. Apparently, turning off
-fcode-hoisting is a better way address PR83356, and the perfo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83836
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83850
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83850
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80276
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Jan 15 11:13:53 2018
New Revision: 256689
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256689&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/80276 fix template argument handling in type printers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83851
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83847
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |8.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83845
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80463
--- Comment #11 from Arseny Solokha ---
How about this one? It makes only trunk gcc ICE, though.
short int t2;
int cd, aa, ft;
void
dh (void)
{
int qs = 0;
if (t2 < 1)
{
int bq = 0;
while (bq < 1)
{
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80463
--- Comment #12 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
(In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #11)
> How about this one? It makes only trunk gcc ICE, though.
>
> short int t2;
> int cd, aa, ft;
>
> void
> dh (void)
> {
> int qs = 0;
>
> if (t2 < 1)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83843
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63384
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83687
--- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Mon Jan 15 11:56:03 2018
New Revision: 256696
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256696&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[arm] PR target/83687: Fix invalid combination of VSUB + V
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83852
Bug ID: 83852
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in sel_redirect_edge_and_branch, at
sel-sched-ir.c:5644 on 32-bit BE powerpc targets
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83853
Bug ID: 83853
Summary: conditional_variable induces data_race
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83687
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.5
Summary|[6/7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83051
--- Comment #7 from Zdenek Sojka ---
Created attachment 43130
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43130&action=edit
another degenerate testcase
This degenerate testcase triggers the assertion failure even after the fix. I
don't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83051
--- Comment #8 from Zdenek Sojka ---
(In reply to Zdenek Sojka from comment #7)
> Created attachment 43130 [details]
> another degenerate testcase
>
> This degenerate testcase triggers the assertion failure even after the fix.
> I don't know if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83847
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Created attachment 43131
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43131&action=edit
Candidate patch
Here's the patch I'm testing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83267
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83854
Bug ID: 83854
Summary: [performance] Improve cse optimization for insn with
inout ops
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83438
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83855
Bug ID: 83855
Summary: [performance] Improve cse optimization for insn with
inout ops
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83853
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83830
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83626
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Jan 15 12:38:52 2018
New Revision: 256697
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256697&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/83626 Don't throw for remove("") and remove_all("")
Backpo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79920
--- Comment #9 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Mon Jan 15 12:38:55 2018
New Revision: 256698
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256698&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Missing vect_double in gcc.dg/vect/pr79920.c (PR83836)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83816
--- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo ---
BTW, I'm using -flto-compression-level=0. In the past (GCC 4.5 ...) I've used
it as a workaround for other "lto compression related" errors.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83834
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57503
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2013-10-07 00:00:00 |2018-1-15
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83816
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 15 Jan 2018, olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83816
>
> --- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo ---
> BTW, I'm using -flto-compression-level=0. In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57503
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83856
Bug ID: 83856
Summary: ICE in tsubst_copy;
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unass
figured) ../gcc-trunk//configure
--prefix=/afs/cern.ch/user/i/innocent/w5 -enable-languages=c,c++,lto,fortran
--enable-lto -enable-libitm -disable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 8.0.1 20180115 (experimental) [trunk revision 256692] (GCC)
[innocent@vinavx3 innocent]$ tar -xzf fastSin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83335
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82931
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #42575|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83497
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83502
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83834
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> So, what exact symbols does it report as incompatible?
> I can't reproduce with my build from Friday late evening on both targets.
It happened during weekend:
2 incom
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83503
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83518
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83825
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82931
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83816
--- Comment #5 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #4)
>
> I think it should either work always or never ...
Yep. In the past the compression-level setting showed different
success/failure rates. In this case here,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83530
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83619
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83620
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83651
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83663
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83834
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
I updated glibc on Fedora 27 on Friday.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83665
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Unsure what to do about this bug -- things have gone back a bit but as you say
the cap introduced artificial limit back in times. But we do have
large-function-growth to limit big_speedup for large functio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83706
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83714
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
1 - 100 of 273 matches
Mail list logo