[Bug c++/83802] Caller doesn't destroy default argument passed to a constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83802 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Maybe Nathan's patch for PR 82560 ?

[Bug c++/83802] Caller doesn't destroy default argument passed to a constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83802 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/82560] [7/8 Regression] Temporary object created as a default argument not destructed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82560 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pdziepak at quarnos dot org --- Commen

[Bug c++/83793] Pack expansion outside of lambda containing the pack incorrectly rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83793 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Looks like a dup of PR 47226 which is already fixed on trunk, but I don't think the recent overhaul of lambda expression handling is suitable to be backported.

[Bug c++/83824] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code with alignas: in chainon, at tree.c:3037

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83824 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/83825] [8 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code with shadowed identifiers: in operator[], at vec.h:826

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83825 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/54422] Merge adjacent stores of elements of a vector (or loads)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54422 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug rtl-optimization/83827] New: vector load/store with struct in registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83827 Bug ID: 83827 Summary: vector load/store with struct in registers Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal P

[Bug target/83810] sh: s-scaval.adb:103:07: warning: "IV_Ilf" overlays smaller object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83810 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug ada/36939] Build Failure Ada SH2e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36939 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sebastian.huber@embedded-br

[Bug other/82530] RTEMS 4.12 SH build failure on FreeBSD 11.1 (clang) with an error in sh_optimize_sett_clrt.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82530 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org Compone

[Bug target/80870] [7 Regression] ICE building 7.1.0 sh-elf crosscompiler on macOS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80870 --- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo --- Could you please try it out with the latest GCC 7 branch and see if the problem is still there?

[Bug target/83828] New: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512vpopcntdqvl-vpopcntq-1.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83828 Bug ID: 83828 Summary: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512vpopcntdqvl-vpopcntq-1.c execution test Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/83803] Using -fc-prototypes on modules with empty dummy arg lists does not close paren.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83803 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to emsr from comment #3) > Created attachment 43110 [details] > patchlet (untested) I actually came up with exactly the same patch independently :-) I will commit this as obvious to trunk and 7-br

[Bug fortran/83803] Using -fc-prototypes on modules with empty dummy arg lists does not close paren.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83803 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sat Jan 13 13:23:31 2018 New Revision: 256606 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256606&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-01-13 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/83803 *

[Bug fortran/83803] Using -fc-prototypes on modules with empty dummy arg lists does not close paren.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83803 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/52162] Bogus -fcheck=bounds with realloc on assignment to unallocated LHS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52162 --- Comment #14 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat Jan 13 13:52:34 2018 New Revision: 256607 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256607&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-01-13 Paul Thomas PR fortran/52162 * trans-expr.c

[Bug fortran/83622] [8 Regression] Wrong code with derived type and -fopenmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83622 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat Jan 13 13:52:34 2018 New Revision: 256607 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256607&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-01-13 Paul Thomas PR fortran/52162 * trans-expr.c (

[Bug fortran/83622] [8 Regression] Wrong code with derived type and -fopenmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83622 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/27766] [meta-bug] -fbounds-check related bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27766 Bug 27766 depends on bug 52162, which changed state. Bug 52162 Summary: Bogus -fcheck=bounds with realloc on assignment to unallocated LHS https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52162 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/52162] Bogus -fcheck=bounds with realloc on assignment to unallocated LHS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52162 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/83744] ICE in ../../gcc/gcc/fortran/dump-parse-tree.c:3093 while using -fc-prototypes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83744 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug sanitizer/82824] [8 regression] libsanitizer fails to build: VM_MEMORY_OS_ALLOC_ONCE undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82824 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added URL|https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc- |https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-

[Bug sanitizer/82825] [8 regression] Many libsanitizer tests FAIL: dyld: Symbol not found: ___lsan_default_options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82825 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/82825] [8 regression] Many libsanitizer tests FAIL: dyld: Symbol not found: ___lsan_default_options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82825 --- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- A patch has been approved upstream: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41346. Will post to gcc-patches once it has been installed. Rainer

[Bug c/51628] __attribute__((packed)) is unsafe in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51628 --- Comment #37 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 43120 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43120&action=edit Add -Waddress-of-packed-member to C/C++ FE Please try this.

[Bug sanitizer/82824] [8 regression] libsanitizer fails to build: VM_MEMORY_OS_ALLOC_ONCE undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82824 --- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Revised patch posted. Where?

[Bug sanitizer/82824] [8 regression] libsanitizer fails to build: VM_MEMORY_OS_ALLOC_ONCE undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82824 --- Comment #12 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- See the PR URL fieldd.

[Bug c/83801] [8 Regression][avr] String constant in __flash not put into .progmem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83801 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Jan 13 17:00:43 2018 New Revision: 256608 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256608&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/83801 * c-tree.h (decl_constant_value_1): Add a bool

[Bug c/83801] [8 Regression][avr] String constant in __flash not put into .progmem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83801 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/83778] [8 regression] g++.dg/ext/altivec-cell-2.C fails starting with r256448

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83778 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/82824] [8 regression] libsanitizer fails to build: VM_MEMORY_OS_ALLOC_ONCE undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82824 --- Comment #13 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > See the PR URL fieldd. Found, thanks! Out of curiosity, why 73 in 'kSanitizerVmMemoryOsAllocOnce = 73'?

[Bug sanitizer/82824] [8 regression] libsanitizer fails to build: VM_MEMORY_OS_ALLOC_ONCE undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82824 --- Comment #14 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- That's the value of VM_MEMORY_OS_ALLOC_ONCE on Mac OS X 10.9 and up.

[Bug sanitizer/82824] [8 regression] libsanitizer fails to build: VM_MEMORY_OS_ALLOC_ONCE undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82824 --- Comment #15 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > That's the value of VM_MEMORY_OS_ALLOC_ONCE on Mac OS X 10.9 and up. Thanks!

[Bug c++/83793] Pack expansion outside of lambda containing the pack incorrectly rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83793 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/47226] [C++0x] GCC doesn't expand template parameter pack that appears in a lambda-expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47226 --- Comment #16 from Martin Sebor --- *** Bug 83793 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/83744] ICE in ../../gcc/gcc/fortran/dump-parse-tree.c:3093 while using -fc-prototypes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83744 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/83744] ICE in ../../gcc/gcc/fortran/dump-parse-tree.c:3093 while using -fc-prototypes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83744 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sat Jan 13 18:22:36 2018 New Revision: 256645 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256645&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-01-13 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/83744 * dump-pars

[Bug debug/81155] [8 Regression] Debug make check regressions in GCC 8.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81155 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/78814] ICE in symbol_rank, at fortran/interface.c:1265

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78814 --- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Sat Jan 13 18:58:56 2018 New Revision: 256646 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256646&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2012-01-13 Steven G. Kargl Backport from mainline

[Bug c++/83817] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: tree check: expected call_expr, have aggr_init_expr in tsubst_copy_and_build, at cp/pt.c:17822

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83817 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Status|UNCO

[Bug fortran/78814] ICE in symbol_rank, at fortran/interface.c:1265

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78814 --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Sat Jan 13 19:12:32 2018 New Revision: 256647 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256647&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2012-01-13 Steven G. Kargl Backport from mainline

[Bug fortran/78814] ICE in symbol_rank, at fortran/interface.c:1265

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78814 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/83829] New: Implement runtime checks for DT format specifier and allignment with effective items

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83829 Bug ID: 83829 Summary: Implement runtime checks for DT format specifier and allignment with effective items Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug fortran/83823] [8 Regression] Character length issues with PACK()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83823 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org Target Mile

[Bug fortran/82007] DTIO write format stored in a string leads to severe errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82007 --- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Sat Jan 13 20:41:00 2018 New Revision: 256649 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256649&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-01-13 Jerry DeLisle PR fortran/82007 * resolv

[Bug sanitizer/82824] [8 regression] libsanitizer fails to build: VM_MEMORY_OS_ALLOC_ONCE undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82824 --- Comment #16 from Rainer Orth --- Author: ro Date: Sat Jan 13 21:01:27 2018 New Revision: 256650 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256650&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Allow for lack of VM_MEMORY_OS_ALLOC_ONCE on Mac OS X (PR sanitizer/82824)

[Bug sanitizer/82824] [8 regression] libsanitizer fails to build: VM_MEMORY_OS_ALLOC_ONCE undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82824 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/80865] broken compilation on Mac OS X 10.5 / powerpc: unrecognizable insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80865 --- Comment #12 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #11) > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #9) > > (In reply to Christian Cornelssen from comment #7) > > > I have made the time-consuming effort of building and testi

[Bug c++/83614] deduction failure for template-template argument with trailing template parameter pack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83614 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/83596] ['17] can't use member pointer result of a constexpr function as template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83596 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/83830] New: has_unique_object_representations_v is missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83830 Bug ID: 83830 Summary: has_unique_object_representations_v is missing Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libs

[Bug c++/83588] [6/7/8 Regression] struct with two flexible arrays causes an internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83588 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|accepts-invalid | Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/83601] std::regex_replace C++14 conformance issue: escaping in SED mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83601 --- Comment #2 from Tim Shen --- Author: timshen Date: Sun Jan 14 00:48:30 2018 New Revision: 256654 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256654&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/83601 * include/bits/regex.tcc (regex_replace):

[Bug libstdc++/83601] std::regex_replace C++14 conformance issue: escaping in SED mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83601 Tim Shen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/83819] [meta-bug] missing strlen optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83819 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/80870] [7 Regression] ICE building 7.1.0 sh-elf crosscompiler on macOS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80870 --- Comment #3 from Anders Montonen --- Current GCC 7 branch (r256652) fails with the "fancy_abort" errors from bug 82091 using Xcode 9.2 (clang-900.0.39.2). GCC 7.2.0 and trunk fail with the same errors. In file included from ../../gcc/gcc/conf

[Bug libfortran/83811] fortran 'e' format broken for single digit exponents

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83811 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|