[Bug tree-optimization/83043] [8 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.graphite/force-parallel-1.c scan-tree-dump-times graphite "2 loops carried no dependency" 1 (found 0 times)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83043 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug boehm-gc/66848] boehm-gc fails test suite on x86_64-apple-darwin15

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66848 Andrew Haley changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug ipa/83051] [8 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3: in edge_badness, at ipa-inline.c:1024

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83051 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug ipa/83054] [8 Regression] ICE in operator>, at profile-count.h:823

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83054 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug target/83768] New: ARM: wrong optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83768 Bug ID: 83768 Summary: ARM: wrong optimization Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee

[Bug tree-optimization/83055] [8 Regression] ICE in operator>, at profile-count.h:834

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83055 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Version|7.0

[Bug preprocessor/83063] [8 Regression] ICE on an invalid preprocessor snippet

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83063 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Version|unknown

[Bug tree-optimization/83081] [8 regression][arm] gcc.dg/pr80218.c fails since r254888

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83081 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug lto/83121] [8 Regression] ICE: in linemap_ordinary_map_lookup, at libcpp/line-map.c:995

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83121 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug debug/83157] [6/7/8 regression] gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c fail, inline instances refer to concrete instance as abstract origin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83157 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/83160] [8 regression] lvalue required as unary ‘&’ operand

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83160 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug ipa/83178] [8 regression] g++.dg/ipa/devirt-22.C fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83178 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug ipa/83179] [8 regression] gcc.dg/ipa/inline-1.c fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83179 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug c++/83186] [8 regression] internal compiler error: in build_address, at cp/typeck.c:5667

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83186 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/83189] [8 regression] internal compiler error: in probability_in, at profile-count.h:1050

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83189 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug target/83203] [8 Regression] Inefficient int to avx2 vector conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83203 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Version|7.2.1

[Bug c++/81327] [8 Regression] cast to void* does not suppress -Wclass-memaccess

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81327 --- Comment #8 from Ville Voutilainen --- I can confirm that this fixes the woes in building and using Qt as far as QVector is concerned. Now that we have this fix, I see that there are other bit-blasts that don't use casts. Would it be possible

[Bug tree-optimization/83288] [8 Regression] polyhedron gas_dyn 2-fold compile-time regression caused by r255103

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83288 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener

[Bug target/83629] [7/8 Regression] ICE: in decompose_normal_address, at rtlanal.c:6329 with -O2 -fPIC -frename-registers --param=sched-autopref-queue-depth=nnn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83629 --- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Wed Jan 10 15:13:07 2018 New Revision: 256432 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256432&root=gcc&view=rev Log: rs6000: Wrap diff of immediates in const (PR83629) In various of ou

[Bug target/83330] [7/8 Regression] generating unaligned store to stack for SSE register with -mno-push-args

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83330 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug target/83629] [7/8 Regression] ICE: in decompose_normal_address, at rtlanal.c:6329 with -O2 -fPIC -frename-registers --param=sched-autopref-queue-depth=nnn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83629 --- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool --- Fixed on trunk; awaiting backports.

[Bug tree-optimization/83435] [8 Regression] ICE in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:211

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83435 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|NEW

[Bug c++/83769] New: Statement expression inside lambda defined and evaluated in global scope fails to compile with optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83769 Bug ID: 83769 Summary: Statement expression inside lambda defined and evaluated in global scope fails to compile with optimizations Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2

[Bug target/68834] ICE: in decompose_normal_address, at rtlanal.c:6086 with -O2 -fPIC --param=sched-autopref-queue-depth=1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68834 --- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool --- Likely the same issue as pr83629 .

[Bug rtl-optimization/83770] New: [8 Regression] ICE in create_preheader, at cfgloopmanip.c:1536

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83770 Bug ID: 83770 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in create_preheader, at cfgloopmanip.c:1536 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code

[Bug rtl-optimization/83575] [8 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: multiple hot/cold transitions found)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83575 --- Comment #7 from Arseny Solokha --- Is it safe to close this PR now?

[Bug target/81535] [8 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr79439.c fails starting with r250442

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81535 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Any further progress? I see you've posted something, but no further follow-ups from you nor Segher.

[Bug target/83735] [8 Regression] generating unaligned store to stack with vmovaps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83735 --- Comment #10 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Wed Jan 10 15:37:49 2018 New Revision: 256436 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256436&root=gcc&view=rev Log: i386: Also adjust stack frame for stack slot alignment We should

[Bug c/82922] Request: add -Wstrict-prototypes to -Wextra as K&R style is obsolescent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82922 --- Comment #2 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ian Date: Wed Jan 10 15:42:23 2018 New Revision: 256437 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256437&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/82922 runtime, syscall: use full prototypes in C

[Bug target/81550] [8 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/loop_align.c fails starting with r250482

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81550 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug target/83768] ARM: wrong optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83768 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/82518] [8 regression] gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/in-pack.f90 fails on armeb since r252917

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug testsuite/82770] [8 regression] gcc.dg/pr78768.c xpass

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82770 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug rtl-optimization/83771] New: [8 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: non-cold basic block 3 reachable only by paths crossing the cold partition)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83771 Bug ID: 83771 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: non-cold basic block 3 reachable only by paths crossing the cold partition) Product: gcc

[Bug c++/81055] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with invalid initializer for array new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81055 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Jan 10 16:37:22 2018 New Revision: 256438 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256438&root=gcc&view=rev Log: /cp 2018-01-10 Paolo Carlini PR c++/81055 *

[Bug c++/81055] [6/7 Regression] ICE with invalid initializer for array new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81055 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] ICE with |[6/7 Regression] ICE with

[Bug testsuite/83772] New: ICE in new test case gfortran.fortran-torture/compile/pr83081.f90 in r256423

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83772 Bug ID: 83772 Summary: ICE in new test case gfortran.fortran-torture/compile/pr83081.f90 in r256423 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/83740] [8 Regression] ICE in maybe_legitimize_operand, at optabs.c:7140

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83740 --- Comment #7 from G. Steinmetz --- Thanks for working on this issue, Janne. I will check it and do some more tests with upcoming snapshot 20180114.

[Bug c++/83769] Statement expression inside lambda defined and evaluated in global scope fails to compile with optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83769 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/71946] asm in toplevel lambda function rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71946 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||giel+gcc at mortis dot eu --- Comment #1

[Bug testsuite/83772] ICE in new test case gfortran.fortran-torture/compile/pr83081.f90 in r256423

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83772 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/83769] Statement expression inside lambda defined and evaluated in global scope fails to compile with optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83769 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Fixed for GCC 8 via PR 71946. Note the original bug was reported about inline-asm but the problem was the same with statement expressions, see comment #6.

[Bug c++/81327] [8 Regression] cast to void* does not suppress -Wclass-memaccess

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81327 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Jan 10 16:59:09 2018 New Revision: 256440 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256440&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/81327 * call.c (maybe_warn_class_memaccess): Add fo

[Bug c++/81327] [8 Regression] cast to void* does not suppress -Wclass-memaccess

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81327 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/82541] Wduplicated-branches triggers in template context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82541 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/82541] Wduplicated-branches triggers in template context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82541 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Jan 10 17:05:14 2018 New Revision: 256441 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256441&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/82541 * call.c (build_conditional_expr_1): Check

[Bug c++/82541] Wduplicated-branches triggers in template context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82541 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/81327] [8 Regression] cast to void* does not suppress -Wclass-memaccess

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81327 --- Comment #11 from Ville Voutilainen --- The issue is again that users of existing Qt versions will see the warnings, and they also turn to errors. I can fix the non-casting uses, but I would recommend removing this warning from -Wall as well.

[Bug preprocessor/83773] New: Warning for redefined macro does not have its own -Wsomething switch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83773 Bug ID: 83773 Summary: Warning for redefined macro does not have its own -Wsomething switch Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/81327] [8 Regression] cast to void* does not suppress -Wclass-memaccess

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81327 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- Every GCC release comes with a http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-7/porting_to.html (similarly for other releases and we'll have one for gcc-8 too), and especially with -Werror people need to adjust their codes not just

[Bug c++/81327] [8 Regression] cast to void* does not suppress -Wclass-memaccess

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81327 --- Comment #13 from Ville Voutilainen --- I understand that, but considering that I plan to convince the committee that the bit-blasts like Qt does should be well-defined, the warning is a bit eager, cast or no cast. And since it does break exis

[Bug c++/81327] [8 Regression] cast to void* does not suppress -Wclass-memaccess

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81327 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug libstdc++/81584] Pretty Printer for string* doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81584 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/81327] [8 Regression] cast to void* does not suppress -Wclass-memaccess

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81327 --- Comment #15 from Ville Voutilainen --- I would like to have the change be a DR. Anyway, I looked at the cast-less cases, they are in qtransform.h, which is included by at least QImage and QtGui, so there will be a fair amount of code that wil

[Bug c++/81327] [8 Regression] cast to void* does not suppress -Wclass-memaccess

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81327 --- Comment #16 from Martin Sebor --- The GCC warning detects several distinct kinds of undefined behavior, most of which cannot very well be made well-defined. Making changes to the checker just because a subset of the undefined cases are viewe

[Bug rtl-optimization/80481] Unoptimal additional copy instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80481 Vladimir Makarov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug libstdc++/80276] pretty printer for std::unique_ptr shows type as std::unique_ptr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80276 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug libstdc++/80276] pretty printer for std::unique_ptr shows type as std::unique_ptr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80276 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- unique_ptr*>>[]> is shown as: type = std::unique_ptr >*, std::default_delete >*> >, std::allocator >*, std::default_delete >*> > > > []>

[Bug other/83737] [nvptx] FAIL: gcc.dg/stdint-width-1.c (test for excess errors) for with newlib stdint.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83737 --- Comment #5 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #4) > Most configurations (for which the libc used has a working stdint.h) > should probably be using use_gcc_stdint=wrap, so that GCC's stdint.h > includes

[Bug fortran/82392] Allign arrays for faster execution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82392 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from Wil

[Bug tree-optimization/83774] New: ICE at -O3 with -Wall: Segmentation fault

/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/8.0.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --prefix=/home/su/software/tmp/gcc/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 8.0.0 20180110 (experimental) [trunk revision 256427] (GCC

[Bug ipa/83178] [8 regression] g++.dg/ipa/devirt-22.C fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83178 --- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor --- We create an additional clone because the edge that brings the context now satisfies maybe_hot_p and previously it didn't. The reason is that the caller (which is called sort) now has frequency NODE_FREQUENC

[Bug target/83775] New: Segfault in arm_declare_function_name()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83775 Bug ID: 83775 Summary: Segfault in arm_declare_function_name() Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug middle-end/81897] [6/7 Regression] spurious -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81897 --- Comment #18 from Aldy Hernandez --- (In reply to Arnd Bergmann from comment #16) > Created attachment 43056 [details] > linux/net/ipv6/route.c, preprocessed and compressed > > To test the patch, I reverted the workaround that was added to th

[Bug middle-end/82694] [8 regression] Linux kernel miscompiled since r250765

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82694 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #13

[Bug fortran/82841] Segfault in gfc_simplify_transfer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82841 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Wed Jan 10 18:44:12 2018 New Revision: 256444 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256444&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-01-10 Steven G. Kargl Backport r254555 from tru

[Bug target/83775] Segfault in arm_declare_function_name()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83775 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug middle-end/81897] [6/7 Regression] spurious -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81897 --- Comment #19 from Aldy Hernandez --- (In reply to Arnd Bergmann from comment #17) > Created attachment 43057 [details] > linux/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_bsg.c, preprocessed and compressed > > A possibly related warning I just saw this week, with

[Bug fortran/82841] Segfault in gfc_simplify_transfer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82841 --- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Wed Jan 10 18:47:44 2018 New Revision: 256445 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256445&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-01-10 Steven G. Kargl Backport r254555 from tru

[Bug fortran/82841] Segfault in gfc_simplify_transfer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82841 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug middle-end/81897] [6/7 Regression] spurious -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81897 --- Comment #20 from Aldy Hernandez --- (In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #18) > (In reply to Arnd Bergmann from comment #16) > > Created attachment 43056 [details] > > linux/net/ipv6/route.c, preprocessed and compressed > > > > To test t

[Bug middle-end/81897] [6/7 Regression] spurious -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81897 --- Comment #21 from Jeffrey A. Law --- I'm pretty sure the testcase from c#16 is a different underlying issue and an DUP of an existing BZ. Note the ASMs. Jump threading is (overly) conservative when it encounters an ASM on the path and simply

[Bug target/83726] [8 Regression] ICE: in final_scan_insn, at final.c:3063

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83726 --- Comment #7 from Steve Ellcey --- I tested the patch on my aarch64 box, I got three regressions: FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/pr78733.c scan-assembler adr FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/pr79041-2.c scan-assembler adr FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/comp

[Bug go/83308] Missing platform definitions for SH in libgo

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83308 --- Comment #18 from Ian Lance Taylor --- OK, the SH support patch is committed, and the exp directory has been removed. Is there anything else to do here?

[Bug target/83775] Segfault in arm_declare_function_name()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83775 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org See A

[Bug target/81535] [8 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr79439.c fails starting with r250442

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81535 --- Comment #8 from Yury Gribov --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) > Any further progress? I see you've posted something, but no further > follow-ups from you nor Segher. Jakub, I didn't contribute for few months now due to health

[Bug target/83514] ABRT in arm_declare_function_name passing a null pointer to std::string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83514 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug target/83726] [8 Regression] ICE: in final_scan_insn, at final.c:3063

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83726 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Steve Ellcey from comment #7 > pr83081.f90 looks like a new test so it may not actually be a regression > related to this patch, but the first two are. pr79041-2 generates: > > t: > mov

[Bug go/83308] Missing platform definitions for SH in libgo

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83308 --- Comment #19 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to Ian Lance Taylor from comment #18) > OK, the SH support patch is committed, and the exp directory has been > removed. > > Is there anything else to do here? I don't think so. But i

[Bug go/83308] Missing platform definitions for SH in libgo

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83308 --- Comment #20 from Ian Lance Taylor --- This will be in GCC 8. Backports to GCC 7 are fine with me but I'm not going to do them myself.

[Bug c++/43486] Preserve variable-use locations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43486 --- Comment #11 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Wed Jan 10 19:40:55 2018 New Revision: 256448 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256448&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Preserving locations for variable-uses and constants (PR c++/43486) T

[Bug c++/43486] Preserve variable-use locations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43486 --- Comment #12 from David Malcolm --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #11) > Author: dmalcolm > Date: Wed Jan 10 19:40:55 2018 > New Revision: 256448 > > URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256448&root=gcc&view=rev > Log: > Preserving

[Bug ipa/60871] [4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: in possible_polymorphic_call_targets, at ipa-devirt.c:1510

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60871 Neil Kindlon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||neil.kindlon at jax dot org --- Comment #

[Bug other/83508] [8 regression][arm] c-c++-common/Wrestrict.c fails since r255836

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83508 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor -

[Bug target/83761] bfin: ICE: in require, at machmode.h:292

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83761 --- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Could you attached preprocessed source?

[Bug ipa/60871] [4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: in possible_polymorphic_call_targets, at ipa-devirt.c:1510

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60871 --- Comment #21 from Neil Kindlon --- Hi, I regret to report that I encountered what appears to be a similar error in gcc version 7.1.0. This is my first bug report here, so please correct me if this information is not helpful or incomplete.

[Bug target/83399] Power8 ICE During LRA with 2-op rtl pattern for lvx instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83399 --- Comment #13 from Peter Bergner --- Author: bergner Date: Wed Jan 10 20:49:36 2018 New Revision: 256453 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256453&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/ PR target/83399 * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (print_op

[Bug rtl-optimization/83575] [8 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: multiple hot/cold transitions found)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83575 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/83776] New: missing -Warray-bounds indexing past the end of a string literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83776 Bug ID: 83776 Summary: missing -Warray-bounds indexing past the end of a string literal Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/83776] [5/6/7/8 Regression] missing -Warray-bounds indexing past the end of a string literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83776 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Known to work|

[Bug fortran/83093] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2266

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83093 --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Wed Jan 10 21:31:43 2018 New Revision: 256455 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256455&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-01-10 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/83093 *

[Bug c++/83777] New: Invalid dependent initialization of a static data member.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83777 Bug ID: 83777 Summary: Invalid dependent initialization of a static data member. Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug middle-end/81897] [6/7 Regression] spurious -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81897 --- Comment #22 from Aldy Hernandez --- Author: aldyh Date: Wed Jan 10 21:39:20 2018 New Revision: 256456 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256456&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/81897 * tree-ssa-uninit.c (convert_control

[Bug tree-optimization/83671] Fix for false positive reported by -Wstringop-overflow does not work at -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83671 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Wed Jan 10 21:40:14 2018 New Revision: 256457 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256457&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/83671 - Fix for false positive reported by -Wstringop

[Bug tree-optimization/83671] Fix for false positive reported by -Wstringop-overflow does not work at -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83671 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/56010] Powerpc, -mcpu=native and -mtune=native use the wrong name for target 7450

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56010 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/83778] New: [8 regression] g++.dg/ext/altivec-cell-2.C fails starting with r256448

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83778 Bug ID: 83778 Summary: [8 regression] g++.dg/ext/altivec-cell-2.C fails starting with r256448 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/83779] New: Trivial bounds error not detected with -fbounds-check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83779 Bug ID: 83779 Summary: Trivial bounds error not detected with -fbounds-check Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug fortran/83093] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2266

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83093 --- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Wed Jan 10 22:35:00 2018 New Revision: 256459 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256459&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-01-10 Steven G. Kargl Backport from trunk

[Bug c++/83779] Trivial bounds error not detected with -fbounds-check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83779 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- The manual says: "This is currently only supported by the Fortran front end, where this option defaults to false."

<    1   2   3   >