https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83220
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra, wrong-code
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83219
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81827
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
--- Comment #10 from Ri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81827
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
Note it happens at -O0 already (going OOM) so a FE issue (was fine before).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81827
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
Hmm, no, all memory is allocate by IRA (and somehow never freed?)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81827
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
Bisection would be nice.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81827
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
Tops out at 4.4GB now at -O0, was hovering around 1GB for some time.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83219
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Hum. Where do we "instrument" __builtin_unreachable () for UBSAN? EVRP
is now more aggressive with recording ranges, where VRP does it only for
SSA names used dominated by an edge EVRP does it always. Thi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81470
Olivier Hainque changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #42747|[patch] don't emit |don't emit
description|.cfi_per
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83219
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
pass_sanopt it seems. Quite late. So how is this supposed to work?
The testcase is
int e;
int
main (void)
{
return e ? 0 : (__builtin_unreachable (), 1);
}
and I bet that if we do
int e;
int
main (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83219
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81616
--- Comment #35 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Thu Nov 30 09:36:36 2017
New Revision: 255268
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255268&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/81616
* x86-tnue-costs.h (generic_cost): Revise
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83213
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
Created attachment 42749
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42749&action=edit
C source code
After 12 hours reducing, this is what I got.
I think creduce isn't very fast, in some cases.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83219
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Because new __builtin_unreachable calls are added everywhere in the
optimization pipeline. I'd rather disable the optimizations where we remove
conditionals or switches that branch to __builtin_unreachable i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83219
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
For the -fsanitize=unreachable, maybe just gimple_seq_unreachable_p shouldn't
return true ever if sanitize_flags_p (SANITIZE_UNREACHABLE).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83219
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83219
>
> --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Because new __builtin_unreachable calls are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83224
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83219
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83219
>
> --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> For the -fsanitize=unreachable, maybe just g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83216
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #5)
> On November 29, 2017 4:35:12 PM GMT+01:00, "thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org"
> wrote:
> >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83216
> >
> >--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83210
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 30 10:29:58 2017
New Revision: 255269
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255269&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/83210
* internal-fn.c (expand_mul_overflow): Opt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83216
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83225
Bug ID: 83225
Summary: [8.0 regression] runtime error in transfer.c
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83213
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83210
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83219
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 42751
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42751&action=edit
gcc8-pr83219.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83219
--- Comment #10 from Andrey Guskov ---
Confirmed on Haswell and Silvermont.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83043
Andrey Guskov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrey.y.guskov at intel dot
com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83225
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83226
Bug ID: 83226
Summary: [7 Regression] std::map with reference T breaks in
C++17 mode
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83216
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017, clyon at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83216
>
> Christophe Lyon changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83216
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83225
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83219
--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83219
>
> --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Created attachment 42751
> --> https://gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81470
--- Comment #12 from Rainer Emrich ---
(In reply to Olivier Hainque from comment #11)
> Comment on attachment 42747 [details]
> don't emit .cfi_personality/.cfi_lsda for !dwarf2 eh
>
> >diff --git a/gcc/dwarf2out.c b/gcc/dwarf2out.c
> >index 3d6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83156
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21549
--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager ---
The issue of undocumented configure options also came up in bug 82824, although
that was a tangent so I won't add it under "See Also"
(In reply to Benjamin Kosnik from comment #3)
>
> As an aside, are a lo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82622
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83226
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83222
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Well, even GCC 7 and older were doing it, but only with -O1 and above.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83222
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 42752
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42752&action=edit
gcc8-pr83222.patch
Perhaps we can do something like this and in initializers try to behave more
consistently ev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83227
Bug ID: 83227
Summary: [7 Regression] internal compiler error: in
process_init_constructor_array
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83204
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83203
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Broken with r254548.
Self-contained testcase:
typedef long long V __attribute__((vector_size (32)));
V
foo (long long x)
{
return (V) { x };
}
I'll have a look.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83226
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Nov 30 13:45:37 2017
New Revision: 255271
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255271&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/83226 avoid forming pointer-to-reference type
PR li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83224
--- Comment #2 from urbanjost at comcast dot net ---
Thanks for checking on this so quickly. I did not reduce my example any further
than I did because it would just print without padding with blanks the way I
expected and not abort if I made it s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83228
Bug ID: 83228
Summary: Remove optimistic assumptions about atomic ops in
optab.c
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83226
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83203
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83203
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> Now, because this is generic tuning we force that into stack.
> Though I must repeat for the nth time that this is very confusing; either
> for some AMD chips (is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83203
--- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Also, please note that in the past, new instructions from ISA n+1 were just
bolted to existing patterns without much thought, under assumption that the new
instructions are always faster than the old ones.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83217
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83221
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50871
--- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill ---
Created attachment 42754
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42754&action=edit
patch to add -Weh-mismatch to handle this case
Since the main concern seems to be EH mismatch, how about this?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76732
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83227
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83229
Bug ID: 83229
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in from_gcov_type, at
profile-count.h:676
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83229
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83203
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
A general comment from my side here is that RTL really has too many ways to
express vector "combinations" / "shuffles". In particular vec_merge can
be expressed (up to the CONST_INT bitmask limit to 128 vec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83178
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65927
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79153
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69811
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80700
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82219
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82720
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82258
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82846
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82719
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65927
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Nov 30 17:29:08 2017
New Revision: 255278
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255278&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/65927 Fix -Wunused-but-set-parameter warning
PR lib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65927
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83179
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83230
Bug ID: 83230
Summary: [8.0 regression] segmentation fault in bind C C/C++
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82219
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Nov 30 17:43:08 2017
New Revision: 255279
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255279&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/82219 - bogus -Wignored-qualifiers with template
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83069
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83229
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82219
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83231
Bug ID: 83231
Summary: ICE on constexpr evaluation
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50871
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely ---
It's better than what we have today, but I'm not sure it's where we want to get
to in the long term.
I've been trying a patch that allows the system_header pragma to be disabled
when building and testing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83232
Bug ID: 83232
Summary: fma3d spec2000 regression on zen with -Ofast (generic
tuning) after r255268 by missed SLP oppurtunity
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83224
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79153
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 42758
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42758&action=edit
gcc8-pr79153.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50871
--- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #14)
> It's better than what we have today, but I'm not sure it's where we want to
> get to in the long term.
>
> I've been trying a patch that allows the system_h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82717
--- Comment #8 from Jim Wilson ---
Author: wilson
Date: Thu Nov 30 18:38:26 2017
New Revision: 255281
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255281&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Riscv doc fixes and improvements.
gcc/
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82842
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82865
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83233
Bug ID: 83233
Summary: [8 Regression] gimple-ssa-store-merging.c:183:3:
warning: unnamed type with no linkage used to declare
variable with linkage
Product: gcc
V
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83224
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83227
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83189
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50871
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #15)
> (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #14)
> > It's better than what we have today, but I'm not sure it's where we want to
> > get to in the long term.
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50871
--- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #16)
> (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #15)
> > (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #14)
> > > It's better than what we have today, but I'm not sure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83103
--- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Thu Nov 30 20:52:27 2017
New Revision: 255282
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255282&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-11-30 Michael Meissner
PR libgcc/83112
* co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83112
--- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Thu Nov 30 20:52:27 2017
New Revision: 255282
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255282&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-11-30 Michael Meissner
PR libgcc/83112
* co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83112
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83103
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79228
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83234
Bug ID: 83234
Summary: Aggressive loop optim warning for loop iteration that
cannot happen
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83234
--- Comment #1 from Ketan ---
I am on Debian 8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81697
--- Comment #4 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Thu Nov 30 21:38:16 2017
New Revision: 255283
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255283&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
2017-11-30 Maxim Ostapenko
PR sanitizer/81
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83235
Bug ID: 83235
Summary: IAND sometimes doesn't take bitwise-and of sign bit
with -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
