https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82847
--- Comment #2 from Andrey Guskov ---
*** Bug 82987 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82987
Andrey Guskov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82293
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83044
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
--- Comment #4 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83080
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82545
--- Comment #13 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Nov 21 16:00:26 2017
New Revision: 255008
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255008&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r253845
2017-11-21 Martin Liska
Backport from mainl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81829
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Nov 21 16:00:55 2017
New Revision: 255009
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255009&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r253886
2017-11-21 Martin Liska
Backport from mainl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82633
--- Comment #12 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Nov 21 16:01:16 2017
New Revision: 255010
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255010&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r254257
2017-11-21 Martin Liska
Backport from mainl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82792
--- Comment #17 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Nov 21 16:01:43 2017
New Revision: 255011
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255011&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r254519
2017-11-21 Martin Liska
Backport from mainl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82044
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Nov 21 16:02:35 2017
New Revision: 255013
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255013&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r255001
2017-11-21 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82042
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Nov 21 16:02:35 2017
New Revision: 255013
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255013&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r255001
2017-11-21 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81829
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82792
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82545
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83069
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83060
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
I'd say for C it's valid to reject &a.s[-1] and &a.s[__PTRDIFF_MAX__] in
static initializers, because there is no guarantee that such addresses are
valid values of the pointer type (only po
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83084
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Is this because the var_location contains an unspec_volatile? Is that a
target bug, then?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83091
Bug ID: 83091
Summary: ICE with -g in arm-eabi compilation
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83084
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Ah, that might be it. I'd say UNSPEC_VOLATILE should never appear in
DEBUG_INSNs. I'll have a look where it is introduced and why.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82878
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82336
Mukesh Kapoor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mukesh.kapoor at oracle dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82875
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80776
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83091
--- Comment #1 from simon at pushface dot org ---
Without -g, in a different file, I got an ICE that may be related: will raise a
new bug if needed.
+===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+
| 8.0.0 20171102 (ex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79072
--- Comment #17 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to neil.n.carlson from comment #16)
> I've confirmed Dominique's findings: Code in comments 0, 5, 11 are working
> now with Paul's commit (Thanks!), but comment 12 code still gives an ICE.
>
> Shoul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83084
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83027
--- Comment #22 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Adding binder flag -F solves the problem in the attached examples
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42630 and
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42666 but not in my real code:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83045
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Nov 21 17:40:34 2017
New Revision: 255018
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255018&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/83045
* tree-cfg.c (pass_warn_function_return::exec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83092
Bug ID: 83092
Summary: ICE in gfc_apply_init, at fortran/expr.c:4228
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83092
--- Comment #1 from G. Steinmetz ---
Alternatives :
$ cat z2.f90
program p
type t
end type
type t2
character :: c(1) = [t()]
end type
end
$ cat z3.f90
program p
type t
integer :: a = 1
character :: c = t()
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83074
--- Comment #6 from Stefan Vargyas ---
>
> Don't use --export-dynamic. This causes __libc_csu_{init,fini} to be shared
> between the objects instead of having a private copy in each object.
>
Thank you very much Andreas for your deep inside k
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83093
Bug ID: 83093
Summary: ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2266
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83093
--- Comment #1 from G. Steinmetz ---
These variants are silently accepted :
$ cat z4.f90
program p
character(:), allocatable :: z
allocate (character(z) :: z)
end
$ cat z5.f90
program p
character(:), allocatable :: z
allocate (ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83094
Bug ID: 83094
Summary: ICE in ipa_modify_formal_parameters, at
ipa-param-manipulation.c:105
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78686
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
The ICE has been replaced with the error
Error: Derived type 't' at (1) is being used before it is defined
between revisions r253763 (2017-10-14, ICE) and r253982 (2017-10-22, error),
may be r253970
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61118
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78686
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83092
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83094
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83072
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> The issue is that when EVRP records value-ranges that only hold temporarily
> it doesn't update SSA_NAME_RANGE_INFO but only the internal lattice while
> if the ra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83093
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82457
--- Comment #11 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Nov 21 19:03:11 2017
New Revision: 255028
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255028&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r254137
2017-11-21 Martin Liska
Backport from mainl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78686
--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Tue Nov 21 19:09:01 2017
New Revision: 255029
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255029&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-11-21 Paul Thomas
Backported from trunk fix for PR82586
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78686
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81327
--- Comment #3 from Ville Voutilainen ---
By the way, this doesn't just block building Qt, but also using it for
development, because all uses of QVector that end up default-constructing an
element will run into this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61118
Florian Weimer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] Spurious |[6/7/8 Regression] Indirect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18154
--- Comment #13 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Trunk now generates isel for power9.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83095
Bug ID: 83095
Summary: [8 regression] many tests fail starting with r255001
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83096
Bug ID: 83096
Summary: Bootstrap on darwin x86_64-apple-darwin15.6.0
(revision 254990) fails
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83097
Bug ID: 83097
Summary: Use __BYTE_ORDER__ instead of runtime test
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82847
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82945
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Tue Nov 21 20:01:58 2017
New Revision: 255031
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255031&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/82945 - add warning for passing non-strings to functi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82945
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83070
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83004
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83004
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> I think this test fails with -mavx and later since it has been introduced.
> The test uses the VECTOR_BITS macro and assumes that is the vector siz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83098
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: i386-pc-solaris2.11, i686-pc-linux-gnu
Between 20171120 (r254958) and 20171121 (r255019) bootstrap broke on 32-bit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82547
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83011
--- Comment #6 from Julien ÉLIE ---
Many thanks for your kind explanation, Martin. Perfectly understood.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81386
--- Comment #10 from Bill Schmidt ---
Where does this one stand now?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48101
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Nov 21 20:47:09 2017
New Revision: 255035
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255035&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/48101 improve errors for invalid container specializations
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48101
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81610
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82547
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Created attachment 42675
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42675&action=edit
Candidate patch
Here's the patch I'm testing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81386
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83099
Bug ID: 83099
Summary: warn_nonstring_bound function breaks bootstrap
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83099
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Ver
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82945
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Tue Nov 21 21:44:26 2017
New Revision: 255036
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255036&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR tree-optimization/82945
* calls.h (warn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83100
Bug ID: 83100
Summary: [8 Regression] powerpc: internal compiler error: in
get_variable_section, at varasm.c:1150 with
-fdata-sections
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83099
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83056
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Tue Nov 21 21:59:53 2017
New Revision: 255038
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255038&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
C: don't suggest names that came from earlier failures (PR c/83056)
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80177
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
Note: r247233 appears to have caused PR c++81610 and PR c++/80567. So if this
is ever backported to gcc 7, we'd need the fix for those also.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83088
Fritz Reese changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83056
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
Fixed on trunk for gcc 8 by r255038; not yet fixed on gcc-7-branch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83015
--- Comment #13 from Andreas Schwab ---
e0fbd2cc7d2a77e5d06bdb7bf92b98a03b9b09ce is the first bad commit
commit e0fbd2cc7d2a77e5d06bdb7bf92b98a03b9b09ce
Author: hubicka
Date: Mon Nov 20 09:55:02 2017 +
PR bootstrap/83062
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83100
James Clarke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jrtc27 at jrtc27 dot com
--- Comment #1 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83101
Bug ID: 83101
Summary: stod, stold was not declared
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83101
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81872
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83102
Bug ID: 83102
Summary: go bootstrap error in ast-dump.cc due to
__is_invocable failure
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65157
Richard Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||richard-gccbugzilla@metafoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83102
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #0)
> struct Import_init_lt {
> bool operator()(const Import_init* i1, const Import_init* i2)
This function needs to be const
> {
> return i1->init_name() <
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78724
Richard Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||richard-gccbugzilla@metafoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83102
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Because otherwise it's impossible to use a const set:
const Import_init_set s;
auto it = s.lower_bound(0);
This fails, because the comparison object in the set is const, and so it's
operator() isn't usabl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64816
Richard Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||richard-gccbugzilla@metafoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83102
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> This fails, because the comparison object in the set is const, and so it's
s/it's/its/
The requirements in the standard were clarified by https://wg21.link
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81347
Richard Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||richard-gccbugzilla@metafoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83091
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83091
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83101
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
You should report this to Ubuntu instead.
I suspect you're using glibc 2.26 which has a bug that causes GCC to misdetect
its C99 support. Ubuntu should patch it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83102
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
If we want to relax the check this should work:
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_tree.h
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_tree.h
@@ -448,8 +448,12 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
typedef _
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83091
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
Created attachment 42677
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42677&action=edit
Tentative fix
Please give it a try on arm-eabi.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59930
Richard Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||richard-gccbugzilla@metafoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83058
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|diagnostic |ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83103
Bug ID: 83103
Summary: Improve __mulkc3 and __divkc3 on Power9
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: libgcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83104
Bug ID: 83104
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimiz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82172
--- Comment #24 from Gubbins ---
> > Does anyone know how I would raise this with someone who can fix it on the
> > Darwin side? Or could it be worked around by gcc?
>
> Linker should provide precise information to GCC.
FWIW, I have raised a bu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83104
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
101 - 199 of 199 matches
Mail list logo
