https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82718
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Nov 21 07:59:03 2017
New Revision: 254989
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254989&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/82718
* dwarf2out.c (dw_loc_list): If crtl->has_b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83068
--- Comment #3 from Richard Bradfield ---
I bisected forward from a few months ago.
The proximate cause is commit r253934, specifically the reduction in cost of
the SSE Load & Store ops, and the costs of moving SSE to and from integer regs.
The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83041
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23094
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83059
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Nov 21 08:06:28 2017
New Revision: 254990
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254990&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/83059
* c-common.c (get_atomic_generic_size): Use T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67530
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83027
simon at pushface dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||simon at pushface dot org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83047
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Nov 21 08:41:47 2017
New Revision: 254992
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254992&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/83047
* gimple-ssa-store-merging.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78821
--- Comment #33 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 20 Nov 2017, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78821
>
> --- Comment #32 from Uroš Bizjak ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83015
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83071
--- Comment #5 from pmatos at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Thanks. It's working.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83027
--- Comment #20 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Thanks for the small reproducer. This has apparently never worked
> correctly...
And the workaround is to pass -F to gnatbind for the main program.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83015
--- Comment #9 from igor.v.tsimbalist at intel dot com ---
I do not have an ia64 system at hand to reproduce. Could you please send me the
log file or at least the part with error? Is the error still the same or is it
different
error? Or could yo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83015
--- Comment #10 from Andreas Schwab ---
See comment#0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83085
Bug ID: 83085
Summary: Suspicious type qualifiers ignored on cast result type
[-Werror=ignored-qualifiers]
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82615
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83076
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83080
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |8.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83081
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82711
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andi at mozilla dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83085
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83082
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83084
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83015
--- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka ---
I was able to bootstrap on ia64 box (terbium) shortly before the unwind changes
went in without the bootstrap miscompare.
So does the miscompare still reproduce for you and if so, would be posible to
attach du
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82995
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83086
Bug ID: 83086
Summary: valgrind error in recent build
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78468
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83015
--- Comment #12 from Andreas Schwab ---
See yttrium:/usr/local/gcc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83087
Bug ID: 83087
Summary: -fcf-protection -mcet enabled unconditionally for
target libs
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83017
--- Comment #18 from Christian Felter ---
Thanks for the great work!! I've tested the new version and found similar
results.
I think the wrong results (which are actually random results) mean there is
another related bug still, so I've opened b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83087
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
# Add CET specific flags if Intel CET is enabled.
# Check whether --enable-cet was given.
if test "${enable_cet+set}" = set; then
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83086
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
On which source file it is? Can you attach it preprocessed + full command
line?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83088
Bug ID: 83088
Summary: ICE with -init-derived
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83087
igor.v.tsimbalist at intel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||igor.v.tsimbalist at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83064
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83086
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Actually no need, I see what's going on.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83087
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to igor.v.tsimbalist from comment #2)
> It's controlled by --enable-cet configuration flag.
Unfortunately it isn't. It only checksif the assembler supports CET and then
enables it.
Without an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83086
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83088
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83087
--- Comment #4 from igor.v.tsimbalist at intel dot com ---
Yes, that's true. It was done deliberately so the libraries get ready for Intel
CET, it was reflected in commit message and changelog. The binaries compiled
with CET will continue to work
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83076
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83087
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
My understanding has been that the CET stuff is essentially ABI incompatible
(CET enabled libraries/binaries vs. non-CET enabled ones) on CET HW, so it
should be better treated like a multilib.
So, unless eve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83064
--- Comment #2 from Christian Felter ---
I did "svn up" and after that I found the revision number like this:
$ svn log --limit 1
r254890 | hjl | 2017-11-17 19:37:58 +0100
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83087
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to igor.v.tsimbalist from comment #4)
> Yes, that's true. It was done deliberately so the libraries get ready for
> Intel CET, it was reflected in commit message and changelog. The binaries
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81794
--- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #6)
> Should be fixed by r254981; marking as resolved.
Thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83089
Bug ID: 83089
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in
instantiate_scev_name)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60095
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83084
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83084
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83084
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The sched1 dump differences are:
// rs6000_sched_reorder :
// rs6000_variable_issue (more = 7) = 0
-;; 0--> b 1: i10031 [scratch]=unspec[[scratch]] 36
:DU_both_power8,LSU_power8:GENERAL_REGS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83047
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82781
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] Vector |[6/7 Regression] Vector
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83057
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83043
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83082
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83078
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83079
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83044
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83070
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83087
--- Comment #7 from igor.v.tsimbalist at intel dot com ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> My understanding has been that the CET stuff is essentially ABI incompatible
> (CET enabled libraries/binaries vs. non-CET enabled ones) on CE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83087
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to igor.v.tsimbalist from comment #7)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> > My understanding has been that the CET stuff is essentially ABI incompatible
> > (CET enabled libraries/binari
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83019
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82545
--- Comment #11 from Ivo Raisr ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #9)
> Fixed on trunk, queued for backports.
I wonder if you had a chance for backporting this into gcc-7 branch?
Let me know if I can be of assistance here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83087
--- Comment #9 from igor.v.tsimbalist at intel dot com ---
Yes, there is "magic" and HJ is implementing this interface. Please see his
answer for the similar question:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-11/msg00693.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83087
--- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
% objdump -dS libstdc++.so.6 | grep endbr | wc -l
5508
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83046
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 42667
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42667&action=edit
Untested patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83044
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83087
--- Comment #11 from igor.v.tsimbalist at intel dot com ---
So the increase compared to object file size is negligible. Increase of a text
segment is ~1.4%.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83046
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82545
--- Comment #12 from Martin Liška ---
I'll backport it today.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82042
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Nov 21 13:39:14 2017
New Revision: 255001
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255001&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix UBSAN errors in dse.c (PR rtl-optimization/82044).
2017-11-21 Martin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82044
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Nov 21 13:39:14 2017
New Revision: 255001
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255001&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix UBSAN errors in dse.c (PR rtl-optimization/82044).
2017-11-21 Martin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82044
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82250
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82392
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82484
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83027
--- Comment #21 from Victor Porton ---
@Eric Botcazou:
Adding binder flag -F solves the problem in the attached examples
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42630 and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42666 but not in my
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83086
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Nov 21 13:54:08 2017
New Revision: 255002
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255002&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/83086
* gimple-ssa-store-merging.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83089
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83088
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83086
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82880
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Nov 21 14:50:03 2017
New Revision: 255004
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255004&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/82880
* config/mips/frame-header-opt.c (mips_reg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82880
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82702
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83089
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
if-conversion fails to do a scev_reset despite DCEing stmts. testing patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83034
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82457
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.0
Known to fail|8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83072
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
The interesting bit is that during the stmt folding
/* For integral types with undefined overflow and C != 0 fold
x * C EQ/NE y * C into x EQ/NE y. */
(for cmp (eq ne)
(simplify
(cmp (mult:c @0 @1) (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34040
--- Comment #16 from Joel Sherrill ---
I assume this ICE during a build of bfin-rtems on the master is indicative of
the same underlying problem. I have reported this before on the sh2e but didn't
know of this PR.
libtool: compile: /home/joel/t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83020
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|('17) Class template|[7 Regression] ('17) Class
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82991
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Found it (old tree):
Index: tree-ssa-sccvn.c
===
--- tree-ssa-sccvn.c(revision 254072)
+++ tree-ssa-sccvn.c(working copy)
@@ -4123,6 +
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83020
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Nov 21 15:36:25 2017
New Revision: 255006
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255006&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-11-21 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/83020
* g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83090
Bug ID: 83090
Summary: ICE on lm32-rtems building newlib libm (in require, at
machmode.h:282)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81804
--- Comment #1 from Joel Sherrill ---
Version: (GCC) 8.0.0 20171120
target: m32c-rtems, likely for m32c-elf
Still happens. line number has moved in the source file but ICE is still the
same.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83004
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82997
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83056
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Candidate patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-11/msg01907.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82933
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82878
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[7/8 Regression] ICE in |[7 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82987
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
1 - 100 of 199 matches
Mail list logo
