https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78502
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79346
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81357
--- Comment #8 from Qing Zhao ---
>
> I don't think there is an easy fix for this example. The compiler believes
> there are 2 distinct values so it uses 2 registers irrespectively of the order
> of the mov and uxtw.
then, why when there is NO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81357
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Qing Zhao from comment #8)
> >
> > I don't think there is an easy fix for this example. The compiler believes
> > there are 2 distinct values so it uses 2 registers irrespectively of the
> > or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43725
Maxim Kuvyrkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49928
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Johannes Schaub from comment #0)
> It appears that to inhibit a warning about using an undefined macro
> identifier, one has to employ the following work-around
>
> #define FOO BAR
> #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47781
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #18
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49928
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Or to put it another way, the premise of this bug:
Only workaround for "-Wundef" is "defined(Macro) && Macro"
is false. There are other workarounds.
Another one is to get rid of the "clever" PLATFORM(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68230
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Joshua T, Fisher from comment #5)
> and my blog where I first encountered this in a closed source codebase:
>
> http://www.nullterminatedstrings.com/c++/recursive-warning
I'm a bit more persu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79750
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77817
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sgunderson at bigfoot dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81582
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78497
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79618
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77817
--- Comment #15 from Marc Mutz ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #13)
> (In reply to Marc Mutz from comment #12)
> > Is replacing a matching comment with __attribute__(fallthrough)) so
> > complicated as to make this a wontfix?
>
> It
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80026
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71637
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jan.smets at nokia dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80070
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80188
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||easyhack
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80271
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80026
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|4.0.1, 4.2.1|
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79292
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80151
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79817
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80511
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67165
--- Comment #3 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Fri Sep 29 00:30:35 2017
New Revision: 253275
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253275&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR other/67165
* elf.c (__builtin_prefetch): Define
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67165
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52763
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80789
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81980
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82103
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82283
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82295
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58689
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58689
--- Comment #9 from postmas...@openbossa-org.bounceio.net ---
Your email was bounced...
-
... because something went wrong between you and your recipient.
Bummer!
What to do next?
W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82299
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58689
--- Comment #10 from postmas...@openbossa-org.bounceio.net ---
[IMAGE]
There was a problem delivering your email to:
eduardo.abina...@openbossa.org
-
WHAT HAP
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58689
--- Comment #11 from postmas...@openbossa-org.bounceio.net ---
Created attachment 42258
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42258&action=edit
attachment-80437-1.eml
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82323
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82357
Bug ID: 82357
Summary: [8 Regression] bogus error: cannot bind bitfield
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82357
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82299
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
101 - 142 of 142 matches
Mail list logo