https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81893
--- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
Thanks. I think https://golang.org/cl/57110 should fix the problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81894
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81896
Bug ID: 81896
Summary: omp target enter data not recognized
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81897
Bug ID: 81897
Summary: spurious -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80657
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69834
--- Comment #16 from Paul Thomas ---
Dear Jerry,
Thanks for your confirmation of my feeling about this. I have enough on my
plate as it is!
Cheers
Paul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53037
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #26 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53037
--- Comment #27 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #26)
> Several of the new tests FAIL on Solaris/SPARC (both 32 and 64-bit):
>
> +FAIL: g++.dg/pr53037-2.C -std=gnu++11 (test for warnings, line 16)
> +FAIL: g++.dg/pr53037-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53037
--- Comment #28 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #27 from H.J. Lu ---
> What are error messages?
None, the warnings are simply missing.
Rainer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81893
--- Comment #4 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Fri Aug 18 20:17:26 2017
New Revision: 251188
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251188&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/81893
runtime: only use PPC GNU/Linux register co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81893
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81572
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53037
--- Comment #29 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #28)
> > --- Comment #27 from H.J. Lu ---
>
> > What are error messages?
>
> None, the warnings are simply missing.
>
> Rainer
Sparc defines STRIC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80164
--- Comment #15 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Aug 18 21:36:50 2017
New Revision: 251189
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251189&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-08-18 Jerry DeLisle
Backport from trunk
PR f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80164
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81898
Bug ID: 81898
Summary: Issue with polymorphic container class
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81897
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19794
Bug 19794 depends on bug 70879, which changed state.
Bug 70879 Summary: Missed jump threading opportunity with multiple != conditions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70879
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70879
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47413
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70879
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Macleod ---
On 08/18/2017 06:13 PM, law at redhat dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70879
>
> Jeffrey A. Law changed:
>
> What|Removed |Added
> --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80210
--- Comment #7 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Fri Aug 18 23:41:41 2017
New Revision: 251190
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251190&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/80210
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81850
--- Comment #1 from Daniel Santos ---
I have a patch that I've tested and will be submitting it shortly (I can't
change the assigned to field yet).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46805
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Fri Aug 18 23:56:28 2017
New Revision: 251192
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251192&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
jit: fix segfault with autovectorization (PR tree-optimization/46805)
arget: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../../gcc-mainline/configure --prefix=/pkgs/gcc-mainline
--enable-checking=release --enable-languages=c --disable-multilib
--enable-gather-detailed-mem-stats
Thread model: posix
gcc version 8.0.0 20170818 (experimental) [trunk revision 251188] (GCC)
an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80210
--- Comment #8 from Peter Bergner ---
Fixed on trunk. I'm testing backports to the open release branches and will
commit them after the trunk patch has aged a bit (next week?).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53037
--- Comment #30 from H. Peter Anvin ---
On August 18, 2017 3:52:12 PM CDT, "hjl.tools at gmail dot com"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53037
>
>--- Comment #29 from H.J. Lu ---
>(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81886
--- Comment #5 from Tom de Vries ---
AFAICT, this is the last version of the patch that was submitted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-10/msg01771.html
101 - 128 of 128 matches
Mail list logo