[Bug middle-end/81724] New: ICE in expand_stack_vars

2017-08-05 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81724 Bug ID: 81724 Summary: ICE in expand_stack_vars Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end A

[Bug target/81725] New: nvptx -run: error getting kernel result: an illegal memory access was encountered

2017-08-05 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81725 Bug ID: 81725 Summary: nvptx -run: error getting kernel result: an illegal memory access was encountered Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Sever

[Bug target/81726] New: nvptx-run: error getting kernel result: an illegal instruction was encountered

2017-08-05 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81726 Bug ID: 81726 Summary: nvptx-run: error getting kernel result: an illegal instruction was encountered Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug testsuite/81727] New: [nvptx] gcc.dg/graphite/run-id-1.c failure: not enough stack size

2017-08-05 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81727 Bug ID: 81727 Summary: [nvptx] gcc.dg/graphite/run-id-1.c failure: not enough stack size Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/81727] [nvptx] gcc.dg/graphite/{run-id-1,interchange-7}.c failure: not enough stack size

2017-08-05 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81727 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[nvptx] |[nvptx] |gcc.dg/graphit

[Bug target/81728] New: nvptx-run: error getting kernel result: the launch timed out and was terminated

2017-08-05 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81728 Bug ID: 81728 Summary: nvptx-run: error getting kernel result: the launch timed out and was terminated Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severit

[Bug target/81729] New: [nvptx] Invalid initial value expression

2017-08-05 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81729 Bug ID: 81729 Summary: [nvptx] Invalid initial value expression Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug fortran/81723] [7/8 Regression] fortran build doesn't terminate on 64bit targets

2017-08-05 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81723 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/81730] New: nvptx and finstrument-functions

2017-08-05 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81730 Bug ID: 81730 Summary: nvptx and finstrument-functions Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug testsuite/81731] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr78218.c: Call has wrong number of arguments

2017-08-05 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81731 Bug ID: 81731 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr78218.c: Call has wrong number of arguments Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/81732] New: Error: Architecture mismatch on "rd".

2017-08-05 Thread mfe at live dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81732 Bug ID: 81732 Summary: Error: Architecture mismatch on "rd". Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other

[Bug lto/81686] LTO hardcodes identity host to target charset mapping

2017-08-05 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81686 --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou --- > I'm quite sure Ada has a way to change the charsets as well? Probably, although I'm far from being an expert in this area. But I'm not sure if this really matters, it's probably entirely handled in the Ad

[Bug driver/81653] gcc configured with --enable-default-pie on SPARC miscompiles hand-written .s files

2017-08-05 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81653 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/81733] New: stage1 libgcc_s.dylib fails to link on Darwin 11/x86_64

2017-08-05 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81733 Bug ID: 81733 Summary: stage1 libgcc_s.dylib fails to link on Darwin 11/x86_64 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority

[Bug target/81733] stage1 libgcc_s.dylib fails to link on Darwin 11/x86_64

2017-08-05 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81733 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug driver/81653] gcc configured with --enable-default-pie on SPARC miscompiles hand-written .s files

2017-08-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81653 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Obviously, if you are compiling hand written assembly and linking it into PIEs the code must be PIC. So what is written in #c2 is not a workaround, but the right fix. If you have assembly that is not PIC co

[Bug driver/81653] gcc configured with --enable-default-pie on SPARC miscompiles hand-written .s files

2017-08-05 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81653 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/81732] Error: Architecture mismatch on "rd".

2017-08-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81732 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Target|

[Bug c++/80605] [7/8 Regression] Bad is_standard_layout result with empty base classes

2017-08-05 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80605 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||raskolnikov at gnu dot org --- Comment

[Bug c++/81634] Some types are incorrectly detected as not standard layout

2017-08-05 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81634 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug driver/81653] gcc configured with --enable-default-pie on SPARC miscompiles hand-written .s files

2017-08-05 Thread bruno at clisp dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81653 --- Comment #6 from Bruno Haible --- > passing -fno-pie seems to be the agreed upon way out here. My assembly code is located in a library (think at libffcall, libffi, gmp, ...). Therefore I don't control the final linker options. So, the only

[Bug driver/81653] gcc configured with --enable-default-pie on SPARC miscompiles hand-written .s files

2017-08-05 Thread bruno at clisp dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81653 --- Comment #7 from Bruno Haible --- And what do you think about the fact that it produces crashing code without any warning? Is there a chance that 'as' could emit a warning when it produces R_SPARC_GOT22/R_SPARC_GOT10 relocations instead of th

[Bug driver/81653] gcc configured with --enable-default-pie on SPARC miscompiles hand-written .s files

2017-08-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81653 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- If anything it should be the linker which should error out. The linker is part of binutils, report it to them.

[Bug fortran/81296] derived type I/o problem

2017-08-05 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81296 --- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle --- OK, with the alternate form of the format (aka format statement) the frontend is not building the correct calls to the user defined procedure. { struct __st_parameter_dt dt_parm.9; dt_parm.9.commo

[Bug sanitizer/81579] sanitizer_platform_limits_linux.cc:37:15: error: conflicting declaration ‘typedef __gid_t __kernel_gid_t’

2017-08-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81579 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug testsuite/81731] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr78218.c: Call has wrong number of arguments

2017-08-05 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81731 --- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries --- Created attachment 41933 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41933&action=edit tentative patch

[Bug middle-end/81734] New: [7/8 Regression] reference to inline function not emitted with -Os

2017-08-05 Thread doko at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81734 Bug ID: 81734 Summary: [7/8 Regression] reference to inline function not emitted with -Os Product: gcc Version: 7.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/81734] [7/8 Regression] reference to inline function not emitted with -Os

2017-08-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81734 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Hmm. I don't remember the c11 semantics when it comes to plain inline. This might not be a bug ...

[Bug middle-end/81734] [7/8 Regression] reference to inline function not emitted with -Os

2017-08-05 Thread doko at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81734 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose --- but shouldn't these the same with different optimization levels?

[Bug fortran/81735] New: double free or corruption (fasttop) error (SIGABRT) with character(:) and custom return type with allocatable

2017-08-05 Thread flashmozzg at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81735 Bug ID: 81735 Summary: double free or corruption (fasttop) error (SIGABRT) with character(:) and custom return type with allocatable Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0

[Bug fortran/81735] double free or corruption (fasttop) error (SIGABRT) with character(:) and custom return type with allocatable

2017-08-05 Thread flashmozzg at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81735 --- Comment #1 from Danila --- Created attachment 41934 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41934&action=edit code to reproduce this issue

[Bug fortran/81735] double free or corruption (fasttop) error (SIGABRT) with character(:) and custom return type with allocatable

2017-08-05 Thread flashmozzg at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81735 --- Comment #2 from Danila --- Created attachment 41935 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41935&action=edit full error/stacktrace

[Bug target/81736] New: Unnecessary save and restore frame pointer with -fno-omit-frame-pointer

2017-08-05 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81736 Bug ID: 81736 Summary: Unnecessary save and restore frame pointer with -fno-omit-frame-pointer Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/81737] New: [8 Regression] 164.gzip in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build

2017-08-05 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81737 Bug ID: 81737 Summary: [8 Regression] 164.gzip in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug target/69639] [6/7/8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/limits-exprparen.c

2017-08-05 Thread nightstrike at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69639 nightstrike changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nightstrike at gmail dot com --- Comment #