[Bug c++/81659] New: ICE in verify_dominators, at dominance.c:1184

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81659 Bug ID: 81659 Summary: ICE in verify_dominators, at dominance.c:1184 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug c++/81660] New: Learn GCC -Wexceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81660 Bug ID: 81660 Summary: Learn GCC -Wexceptions Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unas

[Bug sanitizer/81148] UBSAN: two more false positives

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81148 --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener --- C/C++ testcase: int x = -106; int main() { // -123 - (0x8000 - -1) return (-123 - ((9223372036854775806 ^ ~(x && 1)) - -1)) == 0; }

[Bug c++/81660] Learn GCC -Wexceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81660 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug middle-end/79499] ICE in rtl_verify_bb_insns, at cfgrtl.c:2661

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79499 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Aug 2 07:13:25 2017 New Revision: 250814 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250814&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/79499 * function.c (thread_prologue_and_epil

[Bug sanitizer/81148] UBSAN: two more false positives

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81148 --- Comment #14 from Richard Biener --- Folding -123 - (((long int) ~(x != 0) ^ 9223372036854775806) + 1) results in split_tree of (((long int) ~(x != 0) ^ 9223372036854775806) + 1) returning -((long int) ~(x != 0) ^ 9223372036854775806) and mi

[Bug tree-optimization/81661] New: [7/8 Regression] ICE in gimplify_modify_expr, at gimplify.c:5638

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81661 Bug ID: 81661 Summary: [7/8 Regression] ICE in gimplify_modify_expr, at gimplify.c:5638 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-cod

[Bug tree-optimization/81661] [7/8 Regression] ICE in gimplify_modify_expr, at gimplify.c:5638

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81661 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.3

[Bug middle-end/79499] ICE in rtl_verify_bb_insns, at cfgrtl.c:2661

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79499 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Aug 2 07:26:46 2017 New Revision: 250815 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250815&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/79499 * function.c (thread_prologue_and_epil

[Bug sanitizer/81148] UBSAN: two more false positives

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81148 --- Comment #15 from Marek Polacek --- My other idea was to pass bool ok to split_tree and if it sees that it cannot negate_expr something, set it to false, so that we don't change the expression after split_tree has been called. But if it worke

[Bug middle-end/81657] [8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/20050503-1.c scan-assembler-not call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81657 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Com

[Bug c++/81640] [8 Regression] ICE in lookup_fnfields_slot_nolazy w/ -Wshadow=compatible-local

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81640 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Aug 2 07:28:21 2017 New Revision: 250816 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250816&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/81640 * call.c (build_user_type_conversion_1): Only

[Bug bootstrap/81638] [8 Regression] AIX bootstrap failure due to Recover GOTO predictor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81638 --- Comment #9 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #8) > I already tested the equivalent patch. If the preferred solution is a > work-around for the false positive, I'll install that. Yes, please do it. I've just added

[Bug sanitizer/81649] Instrumentation Options page grammar

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81649 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- That doesn't look correct to me, as it is the option that ensures that the executables are linked against such a library, after all, it is the only purpose of the option. Maybe we should just replace the " a

[Bug target/81641] Assemble failure with named address spaces and -masm=intel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81641 --- Comment #5 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Wed Aug 2 07:37:15 2017 New Revision: 250817 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250817&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/81641 * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_print_o

[Bug tree-optimization/81661] [7/8 Regression] ICE in gimplify_modify_expr, at gimplify.c:5638

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81661 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/79499] ICE in rtl_verify_bb_insns, at cfgrtl.c:2661

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79499 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Fixed for 7.2+ so far.

[Bug target/81662] New: fpatchable-function-entry requires nop, which nvptx does not have

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81662 Bug ID: 81662 Summary: fpatchable-function-entry requires nop, which nvptx does not have Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/81503] [8 Regression] Wrong code at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81503 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #10

[Bug middle-end/81052] ICE in verify_dominators, at dominance.c:1184

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81052 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 41888 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41888&action=edit Reduced test-case Adding reduced test-case (it's hard to reduce more). There's ompexp dump: bool satyr::dc(auto

[Bug middle-end/81052] ICE in verify_dominators, at dominance.c:1184

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81052 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug testsuite/80551] c-c++-common/tsan/race_on_mutex.c fails on powerpc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80551 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Segher any investigation about this?

[Bug target/81663] New: nvptx and fstack-check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81663 Bug ID: 81663 Summary: nvptx and fstack-check Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: u

[Bug middle-end/81052] ICE in verify_dominators, at dominance.c:1184

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81052 --- Comment #7 from Alexander Monakov --- As an aside, shouldn't we issue a diagnostic here? OpenMP spec says branching in/out of simd regions is not allowed, and I think we already diagnose invalid branching for some other constructs.

[Bug c/81664] New: __attribute__((target("movbe"))) does not work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81664 Bug ID: 81664 Summary: __attribute__((target("movbe"))) does not work Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug rtl-optimization/80693] [6/7/8 Regression] wrong code with -O -fno-tree-coalesce-vars

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80693 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- Comm

[Bug c/81289] [8 Regression] ICE in libcpp/line-map.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81289 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c/81665] New: Please introduce flags attribute for enums which will mimic one from C#

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81665 Bug ID: 81665 Summary: Please introduce flags attribute for enums which will mimic one from C# Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/81663] nvptx and fstack-check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81663 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Target||nvptx --- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries -

[Bug middle-end/81666] New: GLIBC build failed with arm/aarch64 linux cross toolchain

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81666 Bug ID: 81666 Summary: GLIBC build failed with arm/aarch64 linux cross toolchain Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug target/81641] Assemble failure with named address spaces and -masm=intel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81641 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/81666] GLIBC build failed with arm/aarch64 linux cross toolchain

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81666 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/81655] [7/8 Regression] new test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr81588.c fails on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81655 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/81633] [7/8 Regression] Incorrect floating point result with tree vectoriser

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81633 --- Comment #10 from Lawrence Mitchell --- Thanks!

[Bug tree-optimization/81655] [7/8 Regression] new test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr81588.c fails on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81655 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 41891 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41891&action=edit gcc7-pr81655.patch As that is a new optimization, I think we should just tweak the testcase for 7.x.

[Bug middle-end/81052] ICE in verify_dominators, at dominance.c:1184

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81052 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #7) > As an aside, shouldn't we issue a diagnostic here? OpenMP spec says > branching in/out of simd regions is not allowed, and I think we already > diagnose inval

[Bug tree-optimization/81655] [7/8 Regression] new test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr81588.c fails on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81655 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Aug 2 10:27:24 2017 New Revision: 250819 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250819&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/81655 PR tree-optimization/81588

[Bug tree-optimization/81588] [7/8 Regression] Wrong code at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81588 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Aug 2 10:27:24 2017 New Revision: 250819 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250819&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/81655 PR tree-optimization/81588

[Bug fortran/67679] [5/6/7/8 Regression] -Wunitialized reports on compiler-generated variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67679 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug middle-end/81666] GLIBC build failed with arm/aarch64 linux cross toolchain

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81666 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/81644] ICE in rtl_verify_bb_insn, BBRO pass duplicates BB that ends with flow control insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81644 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/81052] ICE in verify_dominators, at dominance.c:1184

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81052 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug middle-end/81052] ICE in verify_dominators, at dominance.c:1184

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81052 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 41892 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41892&action=edit gcc8-pr81052.patch Untested fix.

[Bug c/81667] New: trunk/gcc/alloc-pool.h:239: possible missing initialiser ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81667 Bug ID: 81667 Summary: trunk/gcc/alloc-pool.h:239: possible missing initialiser ? Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug other/81667] trunk/gcc/alloc-pool.h:239: possible missing initialiser ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81667 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug classpath/38197] JobSheetsSupported.java: unused local variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38197 Andrew John Hughes changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED CC|

[Bug classpath/38176] Java: 4 * use of toUpperCase/toLowerCase().equals()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38176 Andrew John Hughes changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED CC|

[Bug swing/38198] DefaultTableColumnModel.java: redundant call to new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38198 Andrew John Hughes changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED CC|

[Bug classpath/38193] HashMap.java: unused local variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38193 Andrew John Hughes changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED CC|

[Bug swing/38194] DefaultListSelectionModel.java: remove dead for loop ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38194 Andrew John Hughes changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED CC|

[Bug classpath/38195] ClassRmicCompiler.java: remove unused variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38195 Andrew John Hughes changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED CC|

[Bug target/81664] __attribute__((target("movbe"))) does not work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81664 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug xml/38189] Java: set but not used local variable in tight loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38189 Andrew John Hughes changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED CC|

[Bug gjdoc/38191] gjdoc/Main.java: dead local variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38191 Andrew John Hughes changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED CC|

[Bug classpath/38192] SwingCallbackHandler.java: remove unused local variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38192 Andrew John Hughes changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED CC|

[Bug c/81289] [8 Regression] ICE in libcpp/line-map.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81289 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Aug 2 11:50:16 2017 New Revision: 250821 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250821&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/81289 * c-parser.c (c_parser_unary_expression): Us

[Bug c/81289] [8 Regression] ICE in libcpp/line-map.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81289 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/81668] New: LTO ODR warnings are not helpful

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81668 Bug ID: 81668 Summary: LTO ODR warnings are not helpful Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assi

[Bug c/81448] False positive -Werror=multistatement-macros in openssl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81448 --- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Aug 2 11:56:54 2017 New Revision: 250822 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250822&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/81448 PR c/81306 * c-warn.c (warn_for_mult

[Bug c/81306] valgrind error for function warn_for_multistatement_macros in file c-warn.c line 2474

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81306 --- Comment #9 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Aug 2 11:56:54 2017 New Revision: 250822 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250822&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/81448 PR c/81306 * c-warn.c (warn_for_mult

[Bug c/81448] False positive -Werror=multistatement-macros in openssl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81448 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/81306] valgrind error for function warn_for_multistatement_macros in file c-warn.c line 2474

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81306 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/56412] [4.8] "libtool: cygpath: command not found" for mingw32 host

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56412 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/61450] ICE in gfc_global_used()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61450 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unass

[Bug fortran/60355] [F08] constraint C519 for BIND attribute not enforced

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60355 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig --- Apparently only for implicitly-typed variables. This works as expected: program main integer, bind(c) :: i end program main $ gfortran a.f90 a.f90:2:23: integer, bind(c) :: i 1

[Bug c/81669] New: trunk/gcc/fibonacci_heap.h:58: possible missing initialisation ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81669 Bug ID: 81669 Summary: trunk/gcc/fibonacci_heap.h:58: possible missing initialisation ? Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/60355] [F08] constraint C519 for BIND attribute not enforced

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60355 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/81668] LTO ODR warnings are not helpful

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81668 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic, lto CC|

[Bug libstdc++/81670] New: include/ext/pb_ds/detail/splay_tree_/splay_fn_imps.hpp:253: suspicious assignment ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81670 Bug ID: 81670 Summary: include/ext/pb_ds/detail/splay_tree_/splay_fn_imps.hpp :253: suspicious assignment ? Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug driver/81650] gcc -m32 mishandles -Walloc-size-larger-than=9223372036854775807

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81650 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug testsuite/80551] c-c++-common/tsan/race_on_mutex.c fails on powerpc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80551 --- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool --- It apparently started failing last week of January 2017. Only 64-bit fails, -m32 is fine. I don't know where that missing function name is coming from.

[Bug c++/81671] New: std::nullptr_t incompatible to std::nullptr_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81671 Bug ID: 81671 Summary: std::nullptr_t incompatible to std::nullptr_t Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/81671] [7/8 Regression] std::nullptr_t incompatible to std::nullptr_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81671 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Known to work|

[Bug other/81667] trunk/gcc/alloc-pool.h:239: possible missing initialiser ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81667 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Aug 2 13:25:12 2017 New Revision: 250829 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250829&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR other/81667 * alloc-pool.h (base_pool_allocator): In

[Bug other/81667] trunk/gcc/alloc-pool.h:239: possible missing initialiser ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81667 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/81625] GCC v4.7 ... v8 is bloating code by > 25% compared to v3.4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81625 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug target/81664] __attribute__((target("movbe"))) does not work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81664 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Fruzynski --- So there is another problem here: for some reason both mentioned gcc versions accepts -mmovbe and -mno-movbe options. If movbe is not supported, gcc should complain that these options are unrecognized. I

[Bug c++/81671] [7/8 Regression] std::nullptr_t incompatible to std::nullptr_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81671 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/81671] [7/8 Regression] std::nullptr_t incompatible to std::nullptr_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81671 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/81655] [7/8 Regression] new test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr81588.c fails on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81655 --- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- At the time I had not seen this on trunk but indeed it does fail there too.

[Bug target/81664] __attribute__((target("movbe"))) does not work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81664 Daniel Fruzynski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALI

[Bug c++/81636] Confusing warning message containing "#‘obj_type_ref’ not supported by expression#"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81636 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Paolo added FIX_TRUNC_EXPR and FLOAT_EXPR to dump_expr in r143790, but I believe we need more than just pp->expression (t);, we need to print it similarly to CONVERT_EXPR.

[Bug driver/81650] gcc -m32 mishandles -Walloc-size-larger-than=9223372036854775807

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81650 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org See A

[Bug target/81644] ICE in rtl_verify_bb_insn, BBRO pass duplicates BB that ends with flow control insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81644 --- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Wed Aug 2 13:58:08 2017 New Revision: 250830 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250830&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/81644 * config/i386/i386.md (unspecv): A

[Bug rtl-optimization/57970] segfault in sched-deps.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57970 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug jit/81672] New: trunk/gcc/jit/jit-recording.c:2852: possible missing initialiser

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81672 Bug ID: 81672 Summary: trunk/gcc/jit/jit-recording.c:2852: possible missing initialiser Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/81644] ICE in rtl_verify_bb_insn, BBRO pass duplicates BB that ends with flow control insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81644 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug jit/81672] trunk/gcc/jit/jit-recording.c:2852: possible missing initialiser

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81672 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman --- Probably harmless, but might benefit from some tidy up.

[Bug tree-optimization/81673] New: Harmful SLP vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81673 Bug ID: 81673 Summary: Harmful SLP vectorization Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug fortran/52387] I/O output of write after nonadvancing read

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52387 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/81673] Harmful SLP vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81673 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- What happens if you use -march=intel. Maybe the cost should have adjusted only for the case where moving between the register set is cheap (I forgot the internal tuning name for this case).

[Bug target/59865] gnu multiversion calculates wrong target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59865 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

[Bug c++/81674] New: gcc cannot detect missing initialisers for fields in constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81674 Bug ID: 81674 Summary: gcc cannot detect missing initialisers for fields in constructors Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/81664] __attribute__((target("movbe"))) does not work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81664 --- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Daniel Fruzynski from comment #2) > So there is another problem here: for some reason both mentioned gcc > versions accepts -mmovbe and -mno-movbe options. If movbe is not supported, > gcc should c

[Bug tree-optimization/81673] Harmful SLP vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81673 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/54710] moderately large tuple, with many gets, increases compile time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54710 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/54710] moderately large tuple, with many gets, increases compile time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54710 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||compile-time-hog Status|WAIT

[Bug fortran/53077] replace "Illegal preprocessor directive" message with "Ignoring preprocessor directive at %C. Use -cpp to enable the C preprocessor" (a patch by Tobias included)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53077 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/81675] New: attribute(noreturn) of destructor in :? not honored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81675 Bug ID: 81675 Summary: attribute(noreturn) of destructor in :? not honored Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug tree-optimization/81673] Harmful SLP vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81673 --- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > What happens if you use -march=intel. With -mtune=intel, the lower half of the vector is moved directly whereas the upper one is still done through the stack:

  1   2   >