[Bug tree-optimization/81588] [7/8 Regression] Wrong code at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81588 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 41860 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41860&action=edit gcc8-pr81588.patch Untested fix.

[Bug fortran/52162] Bogus -fcheck=bounds with realloc on assignment to unallocated LHS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52162 --- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres --- On darwin the test in comment 8 fails with -m32. The 'int(asin(c)*100.0)' should be replaced with 'nint(asin(c)*100.0)'.

[Bug other/81611] New: gcc un-learned loop / post-increment optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81611 Bug ID: 81611 Summary: gcc un-learned loop / post-increment optimization Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: o

[Bug inline-asm/54450] Extended asm in global scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54450 --- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #6) > (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #2) > > Probably dup of http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41045 > > Agreed, closing as a duplicate of it >

[Bug c/69505] attribute aligned changes alignment of the same type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69505 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c/66286] Inconsistent handling of Cilk+ array sections

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66286 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug inline-asm/54450] Extended asm in global scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54450 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|DUPLICATE |INVALID --- Comment #8 from Eric Gallage

[Bug c/63398] Cilk errors out incorrectly for spawn inside statement expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63398 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/70257] #line incorrectly handled in error messages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70257 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/70952] Missing warning for likely-erroneous octal escapes in string literals

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70952 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/71188] missing warning converting constant integer expression zero to pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71188 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/71422] Total size of static objects is not limited

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71422 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c/69505] attribute aligned changes alignment of the same type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69505 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug lto/81612] New: lto1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81612 Bug ID: 81612 Summary: lto1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug target/80569] i686: "shrx" instruction generated in 16-bit mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80569 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #10 from

[Bug middle-end/46932] Inefficient code sequence to access local variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46932 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 from

[Bug c/71598] Wrong optimization with aliasing enums

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71598 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/70924] Wrong position for "warning: missing braces around initializer [-Wmissing-braces]"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70924 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/81613] New: [7/8 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/intrinsic_modulo_1.f90 -O3 -g execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81613 Bug ID: 81613 Summary: [7/8 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/intrinsic_modulo_1.f90 -O3 -g execution test Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRME

[Bug target/81613] [7/8 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/intrinsic_modulo_1.f90 -O3 -g execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81613 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- Looking at the difference the old code didn't make any sense: --- intrinsic_modulo_1.s-good 2017-07-30 01:21:37.757618984 +0200 +++ intrinsic_modulo_1.s-bad2017-07-30 01:20:30.321837737 +0200 @@ -100,

[Bug c/71743] return with no value cannot be ignored [Possible regression or undocumented change on https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-5.4.0/gcc/Warning-Options.html#Warning-Options]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71743 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/55976] -Werror=return-type should error on returning a value from a void function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55976 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bastien.penavayre at epitech dot e

[Bug c/70619] Wrong warning with VLA, comma and sizeof

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70619 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|