https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81345
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Mon Jul 10 21:00:56 2017
New Revision: 250104
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250104&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR other/81345 - -Wall resets -Wstringop-overflow to 1 from the default 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81073
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill ---
Created attachment 41711
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41711&action=edit
patch to error on progmem with dynamic init
Does this do what you had in mind?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80397
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Mon Jul 10 21:21:51 2017
New Revision: 250106
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250106&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/80397 - missing -Wformat-overflow with arguments of e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80397
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81066
George R. Goffe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||grgoffe at yahoo dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41992
Yuri Gribov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tetra2005 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81375
--- Comment #2 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Mon Jul 10 22:01:06 2017
New Revision: 250107
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250107&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/81375
* config/i386/i386.md (divsf3): Ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81288
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81066
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I think the tsan build issue can be fixed just by replacing
__res_state *statp = (__res_state*)state;
line with
struct __res_state *statp = (struct __res_state*)state;
It should then build hopefully with bot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81066
--- Comment #11 from George R. Goffe ---
Jakub,
I just tried your suggestion... It worked on "my" platform!
George...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81332
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry Babokin ---
I've jut hit another instance on this bug, which mean that it's probably not
too rare and quite possible to hit in the wild.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81387
Bug ID: 81387
Summary: UBSAN consumes too much memory at -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81388
Bug ID: 81388
Summary: Incorrect code generation with -O1
-fno-strict-overflow
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81388
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81388
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79459
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81389
Bug ID: 81389
Summary: _mm_cmpestri segfault on -O0
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81332
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81375
--- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue Jul 11 05:32:39 2017
New Revision: 250113
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250113&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/81375
* config/i386/i386.md (divsf3): Ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81388
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse ---
(it helps to describe in what way the code is wrong, for instance in a way that
makes the testcase abort)
Apparently ivcanon thinks the number of iterations is constant, as it would be
for the condition dst !=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81388
--- Comment #4 from Nick Terrell ---
Good point Marc.
The generated assembly is wrong because the loop should be run once, but it is
run 2^63 times. Changing the amount dst is incremented by to 4 makes it run
2^62 times, and changing it to 8 ma
101 - 121 of 121 matches
Mail list logo