https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59904
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81184
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81180
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81181
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81184
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81186
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81181
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81180
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81179
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81188
Bug ID: 81188
Summary: decltype(this->member()) raises invalid prototype
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81187
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81187
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jun 23 08:16:05 2017
New Revision: 249584
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249584&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/81187 fix -Wnoexcept-type entry in manual
PR c++/81187
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81189
Bug ID: 81189
Summary: Out of bounds memory access introduced by the
vectoriser
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80759
--- Comment #52 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> The attached patch (on top of v6) *might* solve the problem on Darwin, but I
> don't understand exactly how GOTPCREL works, other than it's using a global
> offset table for linking.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81148
--- Comment #11 from Marek Polacek ---
That causes miscompiled cc1plus. Richi, any ideas?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81189
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81188
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81188
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81180
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I don't think this is a regression, because class template argument deduction
wasn't supported before r240756 - it's a new C++17 feature.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81180
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81187
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81187
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jun 23 10:56:04 2017
New Revision: 249586
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249586&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/81187 fix -Wnoexcept-type entry in manual
PR c++/81187
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81182
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80928
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #41612|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81170
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81175
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*
--- Comment #3 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65775
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81174
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> Simplified testcase:
> static inline unsigned
> bar (unsigned x)
> {
> return ((x & 0x00ff) << 24) | ((x & 0xff00) << 8)
>| ((x & 0x00ff000
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70560
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
A related issue is that we decide on shared_ptr locking policy based on a
dynamic property that can change between translation units according to -march:
static const _Lock_policy __default_lock_policy =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81179
Renlin Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||renlin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81179
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 41621
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41621&action=edit
patch
Patch that should fix the execute fail, but it's a quiet big hammer.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81182
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Reduced:
struct S
{
int i;
};
template
struct T
{
auto operator->() { return &s; }
S s;
};
template
void problem(T& t)
{
t->i;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81190
Bug ID: 81190
Summary: std::optional doesn't compile with containers that
have noncopyable types
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81190
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80654
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lyberta at lyberta dot net
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81191
Bug ID: 81191
Summary: `-fsplit-paths` is listed as `-O2`instead of `-O3`
flag
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81163
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80902
--- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Fri Jun 23 17:37:27 2017
New Revision: 249603
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249603&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix expand_builtin_atomic_fetch_op for pre-op (PR80902)
__atomic_ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81185
--- Comment #4 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Fri Jun 23 18:08:31 2017
New Revision: 249605
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249605&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-06-23 Michael Meissner
PR ipa/81185
* multi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81185
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80510
--- Comment #8 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Fri Jun 23 18:25:10 2017
New Revision: 249607
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249607&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2017-06-23 Michael Meissner
PR target/80510
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80236
--- Comment #17 from Dominik Schmidt ---
I'm having issues to build our whole stack with gcc-6-branch. Working on it.
--version
gcc-trunk (GCC) 8.0.0 20170623 (experimental) [trunk revision 249588]
$ gcc-trunk -Os abc.c
during GIMPLE pass: pre
abc.c: In function ‘fn2’:
abc.c:4:6: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
void fn2() {
^~~
0xc8a4cf crash_signal
../../gcc/gcc/toplev.c:338
0xe56285
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81183
--- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
libbacktrace needs DWARF 5 support.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81193
Bug ID: 81193
Summary: PowerPC GCC __builtin_cpu_is and
__builtin_cpu_supports should warn about old libraries
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81194
Bug ID: 81194
Summary: ICE during RTL pass: expand
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
gcc version 8.0.0 20170623 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81193
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79794
--- Comment #4 from Jim Wilson ---
Author: wilson
Date: Fri Jun 23 21:01:32 2017
New Revision: 249612
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249612&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Testcase for FSF GCC bug 79794.
gcc/testsuite/
PR middle-en
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81193
--- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner ---
One other possibility is to just remove the code that checks
TARGET_LIBC_PROVIDES_HWCAP_IN_TCB, given that when we use it there is a
reference to __parse_hwcap_and_convert_at_platform in the code. That wo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81182
--- Comment #2 from bartek 'basz' szurgot ---
looks like the problem is gone in GCC-7.1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79056
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jun 23 23:29:51 2017
New Revision: 249614
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249614&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79056 - C++17 ICE with invalid template syntax.
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79056
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jun 23 23:29:51 2017
New Revision: 249614
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249614&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79056 - C++17 ICE with invalid template syntax.
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79056
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jun 23 23:30:01 2017
New Revision: 249615
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249615&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79056 - C++17 ICE with invalid template syntax.
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79056
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jun 23 23:30:01 2017
New Revision: 249615
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249615&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79056 - C++17 ICE with invalid template syntax.
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81195
Bug ID: 81195
Summary: SPEC CPU2017 621.wrf_s failure with 40+ openmp threads
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81195
--- Comment #1 from Jim Wilson ---
Created attachment 41623
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41623&action=edit
patch to make wrf_s work
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70936
Cory Cohen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cfcohen at verizon dot net
--- Comment #15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81193
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from
59 matches
Mail list logo
