https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81110
--- Comment #5 from Ada Liu ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> 65536*d[1] will overflow if d[1] is 65535 (0x).
>
> If you did this instead it would be defined:
> 65536u*d[1]
>
> as that is an unsigned * unsigned short so the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81110
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Ada Liu from comment #5)
> But (65536*d[1]+d[0]) is convered to (unsigned long), should not be treated
> as unsigned?
NO. Both C and C++ language is clear here about the expression "65536*d[1]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81089
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jun 16 07:16:34 2017
New Revision: 249237
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249237&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-06-16 Yury Gribov
PR tree-optimization/81089
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81096
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81102
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81109
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81089
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59454
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55310
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81094
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 16 09:13:28 2017
New Revision: 249239
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249239&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/81094
* ubsan.c (instrument_null): Add T argu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59454
--- Comment #5 from Yuri Gribov ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4)
> I'm pasting here Jakub's opinion which I agree with:
>
> ```
> I'm strongly against the blacklist, that is not the way things are done in
> GCC, you have correspond
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59454
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Yuri Gribov from comment #5)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4)
> > I'm pasting here Jakub's opinion which I agree with:
> >
> > ```
> > I'm strongly against the blacklist, that is not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59965
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81090
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
So amending scev_reset to do free_numbers_of_iterations_estimates causes issues
with complete peeling which uses gimple_duplicate_loop_to_header_edge which
calls scev_reset (peeling invalidates cached CHRECs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59965
--- Comment #2 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 16 Jun 2017, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59965
>
> Martin Liška changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63361
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80983
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Fri Jun 16 10:15:42 2017
New Revision: 249243
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249243&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-06-16 Janus Weil
PR fortran/80983
* gfo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8
Bug ID: 8
Summary: Cannot build libstdc++ with -fsanitize=undefined
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64644
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I'll have a look.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78014
Dr. David Alan Gilbert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dgilbert at redhat dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79547
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70844
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70936
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78856
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78856
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78890
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79145
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79212
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79571
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79734
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80918
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80984
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80960
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80017
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80678
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81112
Bug ID: 81112
Summary: [7/8 Regression] internal compiler error: tree check:
expected integer_cst, have range_expr in get_len, at
tree.h:5321
Product: gcc
Version
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81112
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Component|ipa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81092
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jun 16 11:54:59 2017
New Revision: 249246
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249246&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/81092 add std::wstring symbols and bump library version
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81112
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81112
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #41569|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80998
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #41550|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81112
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> Ah, no. This is ipa-prop.c special code (bah).
>
> Index: gcc/ipa-prop.c
> ===
> --- gcc/ipa-p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81092
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jun 16 12:18:53 2017
New Revision: 249248
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249248&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/81092 add std::wstring symbols and bump library version
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81090
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jun 16 12:19:24 2017
New Revision: 249249
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249249&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-06-16 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/81090
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63361
--- Comment #3 from Bernd Edlinger ---
I will start a boot-strap of the current trunk on that old Pentium2 system.
If it still works, it will take a few days.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Testcase that ICEs also with -m64:
template
struct N
{
static const V m = (((V)(-1) < 0)
? (V)1 << (sizeof(V) * __CHAR_BIT__ - ((V)(-1) < 0))
: (V) 0);
};
templ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81113
Bug ID: 81113
Summary: ICE with AVX structure field
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81098
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66803
brootux at freenet dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||brootux at freenet dot de
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46932
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66803
--- Comment #3 from brootux at freenet dot de ---
workaround until fixed i.e. for 1 second:
auto wakeup_time = std::chrono::system_clock::now() + std::chrono::seconds(1);
while (std::chrono::system_clock::now() < wakeup_time) {
std::this_thre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46932
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm-linux-gnueabi |arm-linux-gnueabi, aarch64*
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48315
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
john,
is this still an issue ?
I can't seem to reproduce this with any current release or trunk compilers ?
Ramana
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48789
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80236
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79149
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78318
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81092
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 16 14:29:55 2017
New Revision: 249260
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249260&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/81092
* config/abi/post/i486-linux-gnu/baseli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81092
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 16 14:31:58 2017
New Revision: 249261
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249261&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/81092
* config/abi/post/i486-linux-gnu/baseli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66803
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81092
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78318
Thomas Preud'homme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81102
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78318
--- Comment #3 from Pierre-Marie de Rodat ---
(In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #1)
> Is this still an issue ? Surely isn't the fix just changing
> scan-assembler-times to 38 ?
I could not just change the count, as I got different c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78318
--- Comment #4 from Pierre-Marie de Rodat ---
(In reply to Thomas Preud'homme from comment #2)
> I assume the result is 37 for some platform. Anyway, I apologize since the
> scan has been removed from the testcase so this is now fixed as of r2434
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71815
--- Comment #10 from Bill Schmidt ---
I re-ran benchmarks today and the results that I saw before are no longer
present. The patch is neutral with regard to SPEC cpu2006 performance on
ppc64le. So I'll plan to have this patch reviewed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81109
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Calling memset to clear an object with a non-trivial default ctor doesn't
zero-initialize the object (or begin its lifetime), or establish any invariants
that the default ctor would otherwise set up. Using th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77631
Denis Khalikov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #41478|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81081
--- Comment #9 from Denis Khalikov ---
I've added patch for review
https://reviews.llvm.org/D34149
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80236
--- Comment #14 from Dominik Schmidt ---
Yes, will do on Sunday or next week.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81109
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81114
Bug ID: 81114
Summary: GNAT mishandles filenames with UTF8 chars on
case-insensitive filesystems
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81113
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Upon investigation, I discover that Bad::val field_decl gets BLKmode, because
vector_type_mode is being used outside of an AVX target option region.
Simply using TYPE_MODE_RAW in layout_type dies horribly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71778
--- Comment #7 from James Greenhalgh ---
Author: jgreenhalgh
Date: Fri Jun 16 17:29:56 2017
New Revision: 249272
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249272&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[Patch ARM] Fix PR71778
gcc/
PR target/71778
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81115
Bug ID: 81115
Summary: Didn't compile on Raspbian 2
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80614
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80465
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81045
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81115
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80934
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Fri Jun 16 20:52:03 2017
New Revision: 249278
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249278&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/80934 - bzero should be assumed not to escape pointer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80933
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Fri Jun 16 20:52:03 2017
New Revision: 249278
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249278&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/80934 - bzero should be assumed not to escape pointer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80934
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80933
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80352
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80986
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80236
--- Comment #15 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to Dominik Schmidt from comment #14)
> Yes, will do on Sunday or next week.
Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78233
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81115
--- Comment #2 from Zenithar Champion ---
I'd used this article to compile GCC:
http://choccyhobnob.com/tutorials/gcc-6-on-raspberry-pi/ The only one change is
"sudo apt-get build-dep gcc-4.9" instead of "contrib/download_prerequisites"
../confi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11751
Oleg changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oraytman1 at comcast dot net
--- Comment #88 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11751
--- Comment #89 from Oleg ---
Is this produces correct output?
#include
#include
int main()
{
int i = 100;
i = i++ + ++i;
printf("i=%d\n", i);
i = 100;
i = ++i + i++;
printf("i=%d\n", i);
i = 100;
i = i + i++;
printf("i=%d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81116
Bug ID: 81116
Summary: Last character of allocatable-length string reset to
blank in an assigment
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81116
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80043
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Jun 17 02:27:33 2017
New Revision: 249317
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249317&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/80639 - ICE with invalid PMF initialization.
PR c+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80639
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Jun 17 02:27:33 2017
New Revision: 249317
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249317&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/80639 - ICE with invalid PMF initialization.
PR c+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80831
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Jun 17 02:27:45 2017
New Revision: 249318
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249318&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/80831 - ICE with -fsyntax-only.
* decl2.c (c_parse
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80174
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Jun 17 02:27:52 2017
New Revision: 249319
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249319&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/80174 - ICE with partial specialization of member template.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71747
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Jun 17 02:27:52 2017
New Revision: 249319
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249319&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/80174 - ICE with partial specialization of member template.
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo