https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80892
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80830
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80850
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
I'm trying for some bisection.
I hope this is not going to turn out as complex as PR 79430 ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80921
Bug ID: 80921
Summary: Cross compiling for mingw32 target fails to build Ada
shared libraries
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80850
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to DIL from comment #4)
> Offset of zero is fine. I have never observed this SegFault before. I ran
> the test on multiple machines with GCC/5.3.0, GCC/5.4.0, and GCC/6.3.1.
> Also, as I mentioned b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80187
--- Comment #3 from Ambroz Bizjak ---
Hey,
Does this idea help: https://godbolt.org/g/3Iqp2c ?
The storage is an array of "special" byte classes which have empty
constructors/assign when those would be implemented by one of the mixins.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80187
--- Comment #4 from Ambroz Bizjak ---
Oh wait sorry, that doesn't solve it (yet), the variant_storage_byte would
still have a default copy constructor that copies the byte member.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80921
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80914
--- Comment #3 from Steven Noonan ---
This is from a different go.gcc binary, because I've rebuilt several times to
try and troubleshoot. But this one still exhibits the bad behavior. Just in
case, I've uploaded a copy of the binary, the entire '
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80856
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue May 30 21:13:27 2017
New Revision: 248699
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248699&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/80856 - ICE with local extern in template
* semant
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80731
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Tue May 30 21:27:35 2017
New Revision: 248700
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248700&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR c/80731
* g++.dg/ext/utf16-4.C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80187
--- Comment #5 from Tim Shen ---
(In reply to Ambroz Bizjak from comment #4)
> Oh wait sorry, that doesn't solve it (yet), the variant_storage_byte would
> still have a default copy constructor that copies the byte member.
Yeah, your solution se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54202
--- Comment #6 from Thiago Macieira ---
ping.
If you can't fix GCC so that it can prove that the free is on a non-heap
object, then please change the warning to indicate that GCC may be wrong. For
example:
warning: free() may be called with non
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80910
--- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries ---
Author: vries
Date: Tue May 30 22:00:57 2017
New Revision: 248701
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248701&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Test if host compiler supports -std=c++11 in ms-sysv.exp
2017-05-30 Tom d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80910
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80922
Bug ID: 80922
Summary: #pragma diagnostic ignored not honoured with -flto
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80557
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80850
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
236968 OK
248467 Not OK
Trying 242717 ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80840
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78603
--- Comment #5 from jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jcmvbkbc
Date: Tue May 30 23:41:58 2017
New Revision: 248708
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248708&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
xtensa: Fix PR target/78603
2017-05-30 Max Filippov
gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80916
--- Comment #1 from Davin McCall ---
(Does not actually require -Wno-invalid-offsetof to reproduce; that was just me
copying my command line literally. Problem first appears in GCC 6.1, not in
5.x, still present in 7.1).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78118
--- Comment #6 from jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jcmvbkbc
Date: Wed May 31 00:05:01 2017
New Revision: 248713
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248713&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
xtensa: Fix PR target/78118
It started failing after the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78603
--- Comment #6 from jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jcmvbkbc
Date: Wed May 31 00:05:38 2017
New Revision: 248714
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248714&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
xtensa: Fix PR target/78603
2017-05-30 Max Filippov
gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80923
Bug ID: 80923
Summary: RTEMS SH ICE building gcc-7.1.0 on FreeBSD 11.0
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66313
--- Comment #17 from Dmitry Babokin ---
Any chances for the fix for this bug?
Looks like this one stands as a last obstacle to claim UBSAN in GCC fully
functional.
I still see quite a few errors, but looks like all of them are attributed to
thi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78049
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.0 |5.5
201 - 226 of 226 matches
Mail list logo
