https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79804
--- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Apr 20 20:25:17 2017
New Revision: 247037
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247037&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/79804
* config/i386/i386.c (print_reg):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79804
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80251
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77728
--- Comment #16 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10)
> aarch64_function_arg_alignment
> has:
> for (tree field = TYPE_FIELDS (type); field; field = DECL_CHAIN (field))
> alignment = std::max (alignment,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77728
--- Comment #17 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Created attachment 41237
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41237&action=edit
AArch64 prototype.
Patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70773
--- Comment #11 from PeteVine ---
I've just retested gcc7 on both ARM platforms.
AArch64 gets a 3% improvement now, while ARMv7 reproduces the issue, just as
before. I'm compiling/profiling on a Cortex A5 which could be the main reason
behind a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80476
Bug ID: 80476
Summary: GCC 7 can't be compiled with bootstrap-O3
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80476
mikulas at artax dot karlin.mff.cuni.cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikulas at artax
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79234
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70773
--- Comment #12 from PeteVine ---
It even reproduces the following way:
I built an instrumented ARMv7 binary natively, ran it on a Cortex-A53, copied
the gcda file back, recompiled with -fprofile-use and got the same 20%
slowdown.
Surely, that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69004
--- Comment #36 from PeteVine ---
Created attachment 41239
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41239&action=edit
Assembly files produced with -fverbose-asm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70773
--- Comment #13 from PeteVine ---
Created attachment 41240
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41240&action=edit
Assembly files produced with -fverbose-asm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54924
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Depends on|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69004
PeteVine changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #41239|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80477
Bug ID: 80477
Summary: Polymorphic functions (thus operators) generates
memory leaks
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
101 - 115 of 115 matches
Mail list logo