https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80006
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, msebor at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80006
>
> Martin Sebor changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80033
nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #40961|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80030
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80030
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Mar 14 08:02:34 2017
New Revision: 246117
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246117&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-03-14 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/80030
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80036
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80034
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80031
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80027
--- Comment #2 from Michael Thayer ---
Adding -static-libasan to the build and link flags and linking to libasan.a
(for some reason it is not always done automatically, but our build system is
rather complex) produces a segmentation fault as belo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80038
Bug ID: 80038
Summary: Random segfault using local vectors in Cilk function
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69582
Florent Hivert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||florent.hivert at lri dot fr
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80038
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80038
--- Comment #2 from Florent Hivert ---
Thanks for your quick answer ! I'm not sure to understand what you mean by
"Thus insert a blocking primitive?" Do you suggest to add a cilk_sync somewhere
?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80004
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79912
--- Comment #16 from mpf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Palmer Dabbelt from comment #15)
> Created attachment 40968 [details]
> glibc file that loops
>
> The suggested patch causes an infinate loop while building glibc for RISC-V.
> The prep
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80038
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Don't know Cilk+ but yes, try
for (int i=0; i<8; i++) {
std::vector vnew(v);
vnew.push_back(i);
cilk_spawn walk(vnew, size);
cilk_sync;
}
with appropriate syntax.
We expand
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80038
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
It might be that GCC is in error and that the ctor/dtor need to be arranged to
run per thread. Who knows...
You might want to check a competing Cilk+ implementation for this (I think the
Intel compiler has
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80038
--- Comment #5 from Florent Hivert ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> Don't know Cilk+ but yes, try
>
>for (int i=0; i<8; i++) {
> std::vector vnew(v);
> vnew.push_back(i);
> cilk_spawn walk(vnew, size);
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71557
Sergey Zubkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cubbi at cubbi dot org
--- Comment #1 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71557
--- Comment #2 from Sergey Zubkov ---
er, never mind, that was a different issue, although also with %b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50417
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70582
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71399
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77691
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78345
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78421
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78529
--- Comment #30 from Richard Biener ---
Kind of SUSPENDED I guess. Or we need to fix this testsuite part (in the past
we just added more and more flag workarounds).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79162
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79224
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79572
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79593
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79988
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79511
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79980
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Patch posted to https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-03/msg00675.html
Will be committed for stage 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66295
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Mar 14 11:59:59 2017
New Revision: 246119
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246119&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix multiple target clones nodes (PR lto/66295).
2017-03-14 Martin Liska
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66295
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||7.0
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79892
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Mar 14 12:05:29 2017
New Revision: 246120
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246120&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Verify that target can create a dispatcher call (PR target/79892).
2017-0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79892
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80032
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79162
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79971
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Mar 14 12:57:08 2017
New Revision: 246122
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246122&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-03-14 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79894
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Mar 14 12:57:08 2017
New Revision: 246122
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246122&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-03-14 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80004
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Mar 14 12:57:08 2017
New Revision: 246122
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246122&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-03-14 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49244
--- Comment #21 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Mar 14 12:57:08 2017
New Revision: 246122
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246122&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-03-14 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79756
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Mar 14 12:57:08 2017
New Revision: 246122
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246122&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-03-14 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79977
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Mar 14 12:57:08 2017
New Revision: 246122
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246122&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-03-14 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79576
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Mar 14 12:57:08 2017
New Revision: 246122
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246122&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-03-14 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79666
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Mar 14 12:57:08 2017
New Revision: 246122
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246122&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-03-14 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60970
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69008
--- Comment #6 from Richard Earnshaw ---
(In reply to Marc Mutz from comment #5)
> Why is this only "missed-optimization"? Don't these architecture's ABIs
> stipulate passing in registers, as well as the Itanium ABI? So why is this
> not a platfo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79659
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79820
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Sorry, I was looking at gcc-6-branch which sets errno=0 in close(), but I
removed that on trunk for PR 65411.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79763
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79820
--- Comment #6 from niXman ---
Created attachment 40970
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40970&action=edit
patch
done.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79728
--- Comment #6 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #5)
> So please ignore my mumble...
Still seems broken to me.
If one of the patches could be put into gcc trunk, that might help.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77631
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79255
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-debug
Last reconfirmed|2017-01-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79255
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79908
--- Comment #3 from Bill Schmidt ---
Patch isn't acceptable; still investigating.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79393
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Tue Mar 14 14:41:53 2017
New Revision: 246126
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246126&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79393 DR 1658 workaround
* method.c (synthesized_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79752
--- Comment #5 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: acsawdey
Date: Tue Mar 14 14:43:03 2017
New Revision: 246127
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246127&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
This showed up in power9 code for __divkf3 software float
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79831
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79162
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Mar 14 14:51:19 2017
New Revision: 246128
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246128&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/79162 disambiguate assignment from string_view
PR l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79162
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77631
--- Comment #7 from Denis Khalikov ---
Thomas, before verifying i should fix issues from the list,
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-03/msg00735.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68421
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80014
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80035
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79831
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Mar 14 15:31:53 2017
New Revision: 246129
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246129&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Document -Wchkp (PR middle-end/79831).
2017-03-14 Martin Liska
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80038
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
Block
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80014
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
The issue is that we have a range where caret == start, at the given location,
but where finish == UNKNOWN_LOCATION, for some reason, and so this clause fires
in diagnostic-show-locus.c:layout::layout:
797
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71838
--- Comment #15 from Anton Shterenlikht ---
Yes, the problem seems to have been solved.
My code compiles fine now.
Thanks
Anton
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79831
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||7.0
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79984
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Mar 14 15:53:23 2017
New Revision: 246131
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246131&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79962
PR c++/79984
* c-common.c (handle_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79962
--- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Mar 14 15:53:23 2017
New Revision: 246131
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246131&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79962
PR c++/79984
* c-common.c (handle_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79900
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Mar 14 15:55:53 2017
New Revision: 246132
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246132&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79900 - ICE in strip_typedefs
* tree.c (strip_ty
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79687
--- Comment #24 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Mar 14 15:58:39 2017
New Revision: 246133
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246133&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79687
* init.c (constant_value_1): Break if the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80040
--- Comment #1 from Allan Jensen ---
Created attachment 40972
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40972&action=edit
Assembler output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61636
--- Comment #27 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Mar 14 16:03:10 2017
New Revision: 246134
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246134&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79264
* lambda.c (maybe_generic_this_capture):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79264
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Mar 14 16:03:10 2017
New Revision: 246134
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246134&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79264
* lambda.c (maybe_generic_this_capture): D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80040
--- Comment #2 from Allan Jensen ---
Created attachment 40973
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40973&action=edit
Assembler output from gcc 6
Easier to compare
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79908
--- Comment #4 from Bill Schmidt ---
Any fix for this must also handle this reduced test case:
typedef __builtin_va_list __gnuc_va_list;
typedef __gnuc_va_list va_list;
void
foo (va_list args)
{
va_list ap;
__builtin_va_copy (ap, args);
(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80040
Bug ID: 80040
Summary: SSE4.1 ptest not always merged
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79984
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79962
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79687
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79900
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79865
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80027
--- Comment #3 from Michael Thayer ---
Seems my mistake. I think the ASAN library was still getting loaded
dynamically. Now I have the following problem, which I think means that code
(constructors?) getting called before ASAN is initialised is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80029
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80038
--- Comment #7 from Florent Hivert ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #6)
> Also note it is likely Cilk+ will be deprecated in gcc-7
That's a huge pity from my point of view. For recursive exploration like the
code I put here, I don't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80014
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Root cause is that we aren't setting locations for typeid() expressions. I'm
working on a fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80041
Bug ID: 80041
Summary: std::codecvt_utf16 converts to UTF-8 not
UTF-16
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80041
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80038
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
It's unfortunate and directly related to the maintenance effort involved.
The deprecation plan for Cilk+ would have code in gcc-7, but the code would be
removed prior to the gcc-8 release. Unless someone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79949
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79728
--- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Tue Mar 14 17:50:46 2017
New Revision: 246138
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246138&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/79728
* regs.h (struct target_regs): Ne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79728
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80042
Bug ID: 80042
Summary: gcc thinks sin/cos don't set errno
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80043
Bug ID: 80043
Summary: [6/7 Regression] ICE with pointer-to-member-function
and -fpermissive
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-vali
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo