[Bug c/80036] New: Source line not printed for diagnostic if expanded from a macro

2017-03-13 Thread joriswu at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80036 Bug ID: 80036 Summary: Source line not printed for diagnostic if expanded from a macro Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libgcc/80037] New: Bad .eh_frame data in crtend.o

2017-03-13 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80037 Bug ID: 80037 Summary: Bad .eh_frame data in crtend.o Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libgcc

[Bug libgcc/80037] Bad .eh_frame data in crtend.o

2017-03-13 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80037 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/80009] Printing/writing a structure with a real edit descriptor.

2017-03-13 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80009 --- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to Walt Brainerd from comment #7) > I took "not processed by" to mean that there is no DT edit descriptor > corresponding to it. > > But I see how this might be interpreted otherwise. > > Intel ag

[Bug rtl-optimization/79856] rtl_verify_edges: use internal_error instead of error

2017-03-13 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79856 --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Roland Illig from comment #6) > I would define the rules as follows, the first matching rule wins: > > 1. do not translate messages that contain names of GCC implementation > functions > > 2. do

[Bug libstdc++/79820] std::ifstream sets errno to zero

2017-03-13 Thread i.nixman at autistici dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79820 --- Comment #4 from niXman --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3) > and it also needs to be done on line 275. why? line 275: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc/trunk/libstdc%2B%2B-v3/config/io/basic_file_stdio.cc?view=markup#l275

[Bug fortran/80009] Printing/writing a structure with a real edit descriptor.

2017-03-13 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80009 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle -

[Bug fortran/78661] [OOP] Namelist output missing object designator under DTIO

2017-03-13 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78661 --- Comment #26 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to janus from comment #25) > (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #24) > > I dont think the parent is suppose to emit the Object name. What if there > > are multiple components? > > Huh, I'm no

[Bug tree-optimization/80006] loss of range information due to spurious widening conversion

2017-03-13 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80006 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status|UN

[Bug fortran/79382] DTIO ICE

2017-03-13 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79382 --- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle --- Can this be closed?

[Bug target/80007] --disable-bootstrap with gnat-5 leads to failed gnat-7 build on aarch64

2017-03-13 Thread tulipawn at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80007 --- Comment #9 from PeteVine --- Correction, it was about -fomit-frame-pointer period! Setting the environment C(XX)FLAGS to that flag alone triggers the bug.

[Bug tree-optimization/79800] [7 Regression] wrong snprintf result range with precision in a narrow negative-positive range

2017-03-13 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79800 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor -

[Bug target/79905] ICE in canonical types differ for identical types __vector(4) int and V4i {aka __vector(4) int}

2017-03-13 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79905 --- Comment #3 from Bill Schmidt --- So, is the desired behavior that the front end produce an error message instead? Or is the front end supposed to unify these two types and accept the code?

[Bug target/79912] [7 regression] LRA unable to generate reloads after r245655

2017-03-13 Thread palmer at dabbelt dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79912 --- Comment #15 from Palmer Dabbelt --- Created attachment 40968 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40968&action=edit glibc file that loops The suggested patch causes an infinate loop while building glibc for RISC-V. The prepr

[Bug target/80017] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE: Max. number of generated reload insns per insn is achieved (90)

2017-03-13 Thread vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80017 --- Comment #1 from Vladimir Makarov --- Thank you for the report. I've reproduced and started to work on it. The fix will be probably ready on Wednesday.

[Bug fortran/78661] [OOP] Namelist output missing object designator under DTIO

2017-03-13 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78661 --- Comment #27 from Jerry DeLisle --- With the patch applied and the following test case: MODULE m IMPLICIT NONE TYPE :: t integer :: j CHARACTER :: c integer :: k CONTAINS PROCEDURE :: write_formatted GENERIC :: WRITE

<    1   2