https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79916
--- Comment #6 from Vladimir Makarov ---
I still can not reproduce it but I hope the fix for PR 79949 will be also a fix
for this PR.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79952
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79950
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79966
Bug ID: 79966
Summary: [6/7 Regression] run time more than twice slower when
using -fipa-cp-clone
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79949
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79961
--- Comment #6 from Pedro Alves ---
I remembered to check what does G++ say when you apply the nonnull to a
non-pointer argument. We get a hard error:
$ /opt/gcc/bin/g++ nonnull.cc -o nonnull -c
nonnull.cc:5:67: error: nonnull argument referenc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79961
--- Comment #7 from Pedro Alves ---
Funny enough, clang 3.7 (don't have more recent handy), warns in that case,
while it errors on the "this" arg:
nonnull.cc:3:39: error: '__nonnull__' attribute is invalid for the implicit
this argument
A (con
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79928
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79928
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79952
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79961
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79967
Bug ID: 79967
Summary: ICE on non-type template argument declared noreturn
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79961
--- Comment #9 from Pedro Alves ---
> ((A*)0)->g (p)
This is undefined behavior. We forced the world to fix code like that in the
GCC 6 release cycle: https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-6/changes.html
At best, I'd suggest degrading the error on implicit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79797
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Mar 9 01:01:18 2017
New Revision: 245986
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245986&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79797 - ICE with self-reference in array DMI.
* co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79797
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] ICE with |[5/6 Regression] ICE with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79961
--- Comment #10 from Martin Sebor ---
All the interesting calls here are undefined.
The point of the example is to highlight that the nonnull attribute on the
typedef
typedef void F (void*) __attribute__ ((__nonnull__ (1)));
is interpreted d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79882
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79961
--- Comment #11 from Pedro Alves ---
> All the interesting calls here are undefined.
I meant that the one pointed out is undefined even without the nonnull
attribute. I.e., it's not a use case that justifies supporting nonnull(1) on
non-members
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79961
--- Comment #12 from Pedro Alves ---
TBC, the reason I filed this, is because GDB had an incorrect use like that
that survived for a few months:
https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2016-11/msg00933.html
until someone compiled GDB with clang:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79865
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79968
Bug ID: 79968
Summary: diagnostics: merge similar diagnostics containing
-fdec-structure
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79969
Bug ID: 79969
Summary: C FE emits locus of forward enum declaration rather
than definition into debug info
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79969
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79969
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-09/msg01161.html
was the corresponding change for structs.
101 - 124 of 124 matches
Mail list logo