https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79818
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79818
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Mar 3 08:08:08 2017
New Revision: 245860
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245860&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-03-03 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/79818
* mat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79822
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79779
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79821
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
> Weird, that commit only changes the names of some variables.
indeed, and I compared the .ii files to check if by some weird
coincidence one o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79824
Bug ID: 79824
Summary: [7 Regression] Failure to peel for gaps leads to read
beyond mapped memory
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79514
--- Comment #19 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri Mar 3 09:18:01 2017
New Revision: 245861
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245861&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/79514
* config/i386/i386.md (*pushxf_ro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79825
Bug ID: 79825
Summary: [7 Regression] Uninitialized uses in aggregate copies
of empty structs (missed DCE in C++ gimplify)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79825
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79826
Bug ID: 79826
Summary: Unnecessary spills in vectorised loop version
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79826
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #40877|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79791
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Mar 3 09:58:10 2017
New Revision: 245864
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245864&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79791
* typeck.c (string_conv_p): In C++11, alwa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79791
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79825
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79827
Bug ID: 79827
Summary: genautomata segmentation fault on NI-RT Linux
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79826
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79824
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79822
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79821
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79828
Bug ID: 79828
Summary: missing div-by-zero warning
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79819
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79828
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79827
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79827
--- Comment #2 from Petr Křížek ---
Config commands:
configCmd="$srcDir/configure --enable-languages=c++\
--disable-multilib\
--prefix=$prefixDir\
--disable-shared --enable-static\
\
--with-gmp=$prefixDir\
--with-mpfr=$prefixDi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79827
--- Comment #3 from Petr Křížek ---
Config commands:
configCmd="$srcDir/configure --enable-languages=c++\
--disable-multilib\
--prefix=$prefixDir\
--disable-shared --enable-static\
\
--with-gmp=$prefixDir\
--with-mpfr=$pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79827
--- Comment #4 from Petr Křížek ---
Config commands:
configCmd="$srcDir/configure --enable-languages=c++\
--disable-multilib\
--prefix=$prefixDir\
--disable-shared --enable-static\
\
--with-gmp=$prefixDir\
--with-mpfr=$pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79828
--- Comment #2 from Arnd Bergmann ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Note such warning in the middle-end has the chance of false
> positives from (for example) path isolation.
Would it be possible to warn if a function always tra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79828
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79828
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
s/would be/would have/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79796
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
gimplify_expr can't stomach created in get_nsdmi.
Wait, there's a dup or at least a very similar PR.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79821
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
> possibly GC parameter sensitive
Indeed: the default is
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=30 --param ggc-min-heapsize=4096
Increasing ei
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79796
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
That was PR77659 which has been fixed on the trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79825
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Mar 3 11:30:32 2017
New Revision: 245866
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245866&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-03-03 Richard Biener
PR c++/79825
* cp-gimplif
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79825
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79828
--- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse ---
If we only warn when the trap is always executed as Arnd suggests (determined
in a similar way as uninitialized vs maybe-uninitialized), I guess there should
be fewer false positive (only cloning seems likely t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79574
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Mar 3 11:53:14 2017
New Revision: 245868
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245868&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
GCSE: Use HOST_WIDE_INT instead of int (PR rtl-optimization/79574).
2017-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79827
--- Comment #5 from Petr Křížek ---
Sorry for dupplication,
I didn't understand the warning about e-mail attachments.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79803
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Mar 3 11:53:56 2017
New Revision: 245869
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245869&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add -Wdisabled-optimization to loop prefetching pass (PR
tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79828
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
If the warning has false positives, then I'm sure the kernel will turn it off
anyway like it does with tons of other warnings.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79822
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79760
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Mar 3 11:58:03 2017
New Revision: 245870
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245870&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Properly handle __cxa_pure_virtual visibility (PR lto/79760).
2017-03-03
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79803
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||7.0
Summary|[5/6/7 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79760
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79780
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46854
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79782
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79771
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79771
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
There is
https://github.com/madler/zlib/commit/b4ce6caf0992296230e4e25b22a63e418bdf4dcf
but not enough further info why it has changed. So, report upstream?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79807
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Mar 3 12:24:53 2017
New Revision: 245871
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245871&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/79807
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expand_multi_ar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79807
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79827
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79827
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
You can look at imposed limits with
> ulimit -a
and for example raise stack limit with
> ulimit -s unlimited
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79829
Bug ID: 79829
Summary: Assumes host CC and CXX behave the same
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79830
Bug ID: 79830
Summary: GCC generates counterproductive code surrounding very
simple loops (improvement request)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79830
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79830
--- Comment #2 from Petr ---
I'm not sure I follow with the exit test. I mean the code should be correct as
each point has x|y coord, which is two doubles, so length 8 means 16 doubles (I
converted from my production code into a simpler form that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79830
--- Comment #3 from Petr ---
Sorry for misunderstanding, I really read initially that you replaced the exit
condition in the sample code :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79831
Bug ID: 79831
Summary: [DOC][CHKP] Missing -Wchkp
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: documentation
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79812
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79796
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Surprisingly my naïve attempt to fix this works:
--- a/gcc/cp/call.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/call.c
@@ -8047,6 +8047,8 @@ build_over_call (struct z_candidate *cand, int flags,
tsubst_flags_t complain)
{
arg =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79832
Bug ID: 79832
Summary: [C++14/17] result of array subscript operator should
be xvlaue
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79832
--- Comment #1 from Felix Morgner ---
adjusted the title to be more clear. sorry!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68270
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79793
--- Comment #2 from Yulia Koval ---
Patch posted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-03/msg00178.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79812
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 40880
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40880&action=edit
gcc7-pr79812.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79812
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uros at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79828
--- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
The thing is, if we could prove the trap is always executed, then we'd just zap
everything prior to the trap without visible side effects and everything after
the trap. It's actually not an interesting case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79828
--- Comment #8 from Arnd Bergmann ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> If the warning has false positives, then I'm sure the kernel will turn it
> off anyway like it does with tons of other warnings.
That is well possible. I try to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79699
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79699
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Fri Mar 3 16:35:00 2017
New Revision: 245878
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245878&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/79699 - small memory leak in MPFR
gcc/ChangeLog:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43763
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Fri Mar 3 17:00:50 2017
New Revision: 245880
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245880&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
rs6000: Fix for -mwarn-cell-microcode (PR43763)
If using -mwarn-cel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79833
Bug ID: 79833
Summary: std::put_time has the wrong values for 2 digit years
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78854
--- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle ---
We are not handling the internal unit check correctly in unit.c (get_unit) and
we return a NULL to the caller which is then interpreted as an error. I am
working on the fix now. (just a little head scratchin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79571
--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Makarov ---
I am working on the PR. I hope the fix will be ready at the beginning of the
next week.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43763
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79804
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79571
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77687
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50467
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77687
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79596
--- Comment #2 from Roland Illig ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1)
> > Internal errors should not be translated. Their only purpose is to give
> > information back to the developers, and this information should not be
> > mod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78687
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71437
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77854
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58987
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code
Known to work
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79834
Bug ID: 79834
Summary: c/c-parser.c: make code more i18n-friendly
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79835
Bug ID: 79835
Summary: load to a variable outside the scope of a function is
optimized out
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79805
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Mar 3 19:32:01 2017
New Revision: 245882
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245882&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/79805
* internal-fn.def (ATOMIC_BIT_TEST_AND
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79835
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |middle-end
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78379
--- Comment #27 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to # David Edelsohn from comment #26)
> What is AVX-specific, as opposed to SIMD vector size-specific, about this
> feature? It seems that this should be enabled for all SIMD architectures of
> the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79836
Bug ID: 79836
Summary: typo in c/c-parser.c: pragma omp ordered
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78379
--- Comment #28 from David Edelsohn ---
Because PPC64LE Linux reset the base ISA level, VSX now is enabled by default,
so a function clone for VSX probably isn't necessary. While special versions
might help AIX and PPC64BE, with lower ISA defaul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79837
Bug ID: 79837
Summary: incomplete diagnostic in c-parser: expected +, *, -,
&, ^, |, &&, ||, min or identifier
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79836
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Mar 3 19:56:54 2017
New Revision: 245883
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245883&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/79836
* c-parser.c (c_parser_generic_selection): Use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79836
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79838
Bug ID: 79838
Summary: inconsistent trailing dot in diagnostic "The name %qs
has already been used"
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79837
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Mar 3 20:16:58 2017
New Revision: 245885
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245885&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/79837
* c-parser.c (c_parser_omp_clause_reduction): D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79837
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79805
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79839
Bug ID: 79839
Summary: malloc(0) returns 0 on AIX even with
_LINUX_SOURCE_COMPAT
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
