https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64081
--- Comment #29 from Aldy Hernandez ---
> Are there any other particular tricks for bootstrapping GCC circa 219827 on
> this AIX? Are there any other configury or otherwise flags?
FYI, I also tried --disable-nls as per comment 21, but I get a d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79334
--- Comment #4 from Alan Modra ---
When you have the tree optimization bug fixed, this becomes an rtl optimization
bug since rtl pre does the same as tree pre..
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56828
kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66144
--- Comment #4 from Michael Meissner ---
Created attachment 40657
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40657&action=edit
Potential patch to do the optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79348
--- Comment #5 from Dominik Vogt ---
The test failure has started with r238647:
Move allocator in std::string and RB tree move constructors
PR libstdc++/71964
* include/bits/basic_string.h [_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI]
(b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66144
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #40657|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79349
Bug ID: 79349
Summary: unused std::string is not optimized away in presense
of a call
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79348
--- Comment #6 from Dominik Vogt ---
Before that the "undesignated symbols" were around already, but the test PASSed
anyway.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79350
Bug ID: 79350
Summary: "explicit" deduction guides don't work
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79351
Bug ID: 79351
Summary: Invalid tree PRE optimization around compound literal
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79352
Bug ID: 79352
Summary: [6 Regression] -fprintf-return-value doesn't handle
flexible-like array members properly
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79352
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64081
--- Comment #30 from David Edelsohn ---
.../src/src/configure --disable-werror --with-gmp=/opt/cfarm
--with-libiconv-prefix=/opt/cfarm --disable-libstdcxx-pch
--with-included-gettext
By the way, it's a lot faster if the src and build directories
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63256
acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69992
--- Comment #2 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Digging deeper, if i is not 64-bit, we don't choose it as one of the IVs, and
the loop iteration test gets converted based on ap instead. Then the math in
iv_number_of_iterations decides that it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79353
Bug ID: 79353
Summary: ICE in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:3773
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
URL: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gcc-7&a
rch=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79354
Bug ID: 79354
Summary: [7 Regression] -mcpu=power8 -O2 generates power9
instruction on powerpc64le-linux
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79354
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79279
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66144
--- Comment #6 from Michael Meissner ---
Created attachment 40660
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40660&action=edit
Replacement proposed patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79343
--- Comment #4 from Alan Modra ---
Followup here:
https://github.com/xianyi/OpenBLAS/issues/1078
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79352
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79354
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Perhaps add also foo (&b); below foo (&h); to avoid any kind of IPA thinking
the memcpy is useless.
It is apparently the movsi_from_sf instruction that has this, added by Michael
in r244279. TARGET_NO_SF_SU
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79327
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Variant patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-02/msg00156.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79354
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Looking at tmp-mddump.md, the only other insn that emits the stxssp instruction
is movsf_hardfloat and that uses wb constraint for the input_operand and only
uses wu constraint for stxsspx, while movsi_from_s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79354
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 40661
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40661&action=edit
gcc7-pr79354.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79275
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Fri Feb 3 02:18:59 2017
New Revision: 245142
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245142&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/79275 - -Wformat-overflow false positive exceeding INT_MAX
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79275
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79354
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool ---
That looks good to me. Mike, to you too?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79354
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79354
--- Comment #6 from Alan Modra ---
Regression tested powerpc64le-linux successfully.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79352
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79354
--- Comment #7 from Michael Meissner ---
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 01:41:44AM +, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79354
>
> --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Created attachment 40661
> -->
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68823
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Pop ---
The data dependence relations are dumped in the output of
-fdump-tree-graphite-all.
graphite-dependences.c contains the code for the data dependence computations.
Looking at the gimple code it seems like a tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79061
--- Comment #32 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Fri Feb 3 07:17:38 2017
New Revision: 245144
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245144&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR lto/79061
* asan.c (asan_add_global): Fo
101 - 135 of 135 matches
Mail list logo