https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78952
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Another testcase:
--cut here--
extern void foo (void);
extern void bar (void);
struct S1
{
char pad1;
char val;
short pad2;
};
void test (struct S1 a)
{
if (a.val)
foo ();
else
bar ();
}
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65530
Bug 65530 depends on bug 63994, which changed state.
Bug 63994 Summary: Ada bootstrap fails with -fcheck-pointer-bounds -mmpx
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63994
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63994
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78954
Bug ID: 78954
Summary: optimization: broadcast of non-constant scalar into
SSE2 register
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78954
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Try -mcpu=intel . IIRC some AMD processors perform worse when going directly
from the gprs here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78954
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
That depends on which CPU you tune for.
E.g. with -mtune=intel or -mtune=core2 etc. you get what you are asking for,
-mtune=generic takes into account that the movd%edi, %xmm1 insn is very
slow on some AM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78954
--- Comment #3 from Jens Maurer ---
Ok, thanks. So, this essentially says most/all AMD CPUs have bad general-reg
-> xmm move performance. Oh well.
Please close.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78954
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71880
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
When compiled with '-m64 -fsanitize=address' the test give at run time
=
==81688==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: negative-size-param: (size=-1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78745
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 30 19:15:42 2016
New Revision: 243981
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243981&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR translation/78745
* exgettext: Handle multi-line help t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78745
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 30 19:18:25 2016
New Revision: 243982
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243982&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR translation/78745
* exgettext: Handle multi-line help t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78745
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 30 19:21:22 2016
New Revision: 243983
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243983&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR translation/78745
* exgettext: Handle multi-line help
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78745
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78900
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78900
--- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner ---
Created attachment 40432
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40432&action=edit
Proposed patch to fix the problem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71880
Harald Anlauf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gmx dot de
--- Comment #4 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77528
jerryct changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jerry.c.t at web dot de
--- Comment #4 from je
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78955
Bug ID: 78955
Summary: [c++ concepts] Concept requirements on functions
cancels the private section method check in the
following code
Product: gcc
Version: c++-c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78698
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Klose ---
patch posted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-12/msg02004.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78697
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose ---
patch posted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-12/msg02003.html
20 matches
Mail list logo
