https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78732
Bug ID: 78732
Summary: Wrong description for Wendif-labels
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
A
/bin/arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/home/sh/install/libexec/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabihf/7.0.0/lto-wrapper
arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc (GCC) 7.0.0 20161208 (experimental) [trunk revision
5b2a614:e5a02c3:beea0800baadbe98febe5a4e54112d76ea10a9d3]
Copyright (C) 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78733
Bug ID: 78733
Summary: [7 Regression] bootstrap broken on aarch64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78733
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I don't see it in my last build
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2016-12/msg00866.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78733
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||assemble-failure, build
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59997
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78733
James Greenhalgh changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78733
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77375
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6 Regression] constant |[5 Regression] constant
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77482
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77624
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6 Regression] ICE on |[5 Regression] ICE on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69860
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77587
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6 Regression] C compiler |[5 Regression] C compiler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77638
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77637
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed for 6.3+ as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78733
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #4)
> > I haven't seen this for other values of mcmodel in my testing. I wonder how
> > -mcmodel=tiny made it in to your bootstrap flags?
> >
>
> Perhaps the --enable-mult
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77665
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6 Regression] ICE in |[5 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77666
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed for 6.3+ as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77722
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed for 6.3+ as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66343
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed for 6.3+ as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77467
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed for 6.3+ as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78025
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6 Regression] ICE in |[5 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77919
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6 Regression] ICE|[5 Regression] ICE
|co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78089
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed for 6.3+ as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77973
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78733
--- Comment #6 from Matthias Klose ---
yes, I'm configuring with --enable-fix-cortex-a53-843419
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78721
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78721
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
commit 166f817874730a11c132419554bb13a34c01963f
Author: kugan
Date: Wed Nov 9 01:41:26 2016 +
Fix ice in set_value_range
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-11-09 Kugan Vivekanandarajah
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78733
James Greenhalgh changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78299
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78419
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed for 6.3+ as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67335
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78378
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6 Regression] wrong code |[5 Regression] wrong code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77285
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6 Regression] extern |[5 Regression] extern
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78416
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed for 6.3+ as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78298
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed for 6.3+ as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77591
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69183
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed for 6.3+ as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77739
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6 Regression] internal |[5 Regression] internal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78546
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72808
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78540
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78734
Bug ID: 78734
Summary: [C++17] P0145R3: function arguments are
indeterminately sequenced
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78649
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6 Regression] ICE on |[5 Regression] ICE on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78725
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78725
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78694
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78694
--- Comment #11 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Though it is quite fragile. I can't reproduce it on a cross-toolchain, but it
does trigger on a native machine
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78726
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78723
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78726
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78723
--- Comment #3 from Eric Fiselier ---
The joke title was a lot funnier a year ago.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78729
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78730
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78727
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
*** Bug 78729 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78728
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78727
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
*** Bug 78728 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78727
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
*** Bug 78730 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78726
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Most likely one of the endless reassoc bugs not properly updating or
invalidating range information. Before reassoc1 we have:
# RANGE [4294967040, 4294967295]
a_11 = (unsigned int) _3;
c.1_4 = c;
# R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77459
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78721
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78694
--- Comment #12 from Sebastian Huber ---
Its strange that it is so hard to reproduce. Maybe it has something to do with
the default architecture version.
It fails with:
-mthumb -O2 -ftls-model=local-exec -march=armv4t
-mthumb -O2 -ftls-model=l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78684
--- Comment #9 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amker
Date: Thu Dec 8 10:56:41 2016
New Revision: 243431
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243431&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/78684
* tree-vect-loop-manip.c (cr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78112
--- Comment #18 from pmderodat at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: pmderodat
Date: Thu Dec 8 11:01:03 2016
New Revision: 243432
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243432&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR78112] Remove platform-dependent checks in g++.dg/pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78112
--- Comment #19 from pmderodat at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: pmderodat
Date: Thu Dec 8 11:04:11 2016
New Revision: 243433
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243433&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add the missing ChangeLog entry for r243432
2016-12-08
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78694
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking
St
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78264
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78735
Bug ID: 78735
Summary: profiledbootstrap with --enable-checking=yes,rtl fails
on trunk due to -Werror=strict-overflow
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78733
wilco at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71856
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Dec 8 12:08:14 2016
New Revision: 243434
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243434&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR71856 try to fix Parallel Mode assertions again
PR libstdc++/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78736
Bug ID: 78736
Summary: enum warnings in GCC
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78716
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78736
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77459
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Dec 8 12:40:58 2016
New Revision: 243435
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243435&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR77459 avoid snprintf for debug mode diagnostics
Backport from mainlin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71856
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Dec 8 12:41:07 2016
New Revision: 243436
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243436&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR71856 try to fix Parallel Mode assertions again
PR libstdc++/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71856
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77459
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61767
--- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #9)
> Thus: The patch in comment #7 should be discarded, and comment #5 is the way
> to go here.
I just realized that also comment #5 is not fully correct. Instead
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78736
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
And it's included in -Wall
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78720
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78720
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |tree-optimization
--- Comment #4 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67807
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78666
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
Multiple format attributes for the same function, naming different
arguments as a format string, are perfectly valid; they mean the function
uses multiple format strings (each of which has
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78720
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77674
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka ---
I am testing the following:
Index: symtab.c
===
--- symtab.c(revision 243291)
+++ symtab.c(working copy)
@@ -2214,6 +2214,8 @@ symtab_node
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78726
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78733
--- Comment #9 from wilco at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-12/msg00653.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78666
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
They sure are! (We should document it.)
But what is specifying multiple declarations of the same function with
different sets of attributes supposed to mean? Is it supposed to apply the
union of all of them
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78737
Bug ID: 78737
Summary: linking error with deferred, undefined user-defined
derived-type I/O
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78264
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu Dec 8 15:52:11 2016
New Revision: 243443
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243443&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/78264
* include/bits/c++config (_GLIBCXX_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78264
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78695
--- Comment #8 from Matthias Klose ---
still seen with r243430, but you need -fstack-protector or
-fstack-protector-strong
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78695
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78695
--- Comment #10 from Bill Schmidt ---
Excellent, thanks.
I am out of the office today but will have a look at this tomorrow.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42679
maemarcus at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maemarcus at gmail dot com
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78738
Bug ID: 78738
Summary: [7 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78738
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose ---
Created attachment 40282
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40282&action=edit
preprocessed source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66544
--- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #4)
> Btw, I don't fully understand why "implicit none" should make any difference
> here.
The problem is that we simply do not know which typespec to give to 'z' (a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69398
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Note that we also have a rejects-valid problem with the following code:
program p
type t
end type
class(t), allocatable :: z
target :: z(:)
allocate (z(2))
end
which is rejected w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71913
Pádraig Brady changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||P at draigBrady dot com
--- Comment #13
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
