https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78614
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77538
--- Comment #20 from peien luo ---
(In reply to Dmitry Vyukov from comment #18)
> Looks like shadow stack overflow.
> Do you use fibers, ucontext, longjmp, exceptions or any other non-obvious
> control flow constructs?
> Fibers and exceptions are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78599
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78623
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
clang agrees with GCC:
> clang++ t.C -S -std=c++11
t.C:15:20: error: use 'template' keyword to treat 'foo' as a dependent template
name
result.foo(); // (*)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78620
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
AFAIK padding bytes are always having undefined content (even in C).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78619
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78616
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78615
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |7.0
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78213
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78628
Bug ID: 78628
Summary: GO fails to build a translation unit decl
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-debug
Severity: normal
Priority:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70909
--- Comment #18 from Marcel Böhme ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #17)
> Nathan's patch fixes this issue:
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/701137/
> It is currently being reviewed.
It doesn't seem to fix the original issue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78629
Bug ID: 78629
Summary: vec.h: null pointer passed as argument 1, which is
declared to never be null
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78587
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Dec 1 09:24:55 2016
New Revision: 243100
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243100&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/78587
* dwarf2out.c (loc_descr_plus_const): For n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78629
--- Comment #1 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This slight change to finish_match_operand() fixes the error, but not
sure if it's correct.
diff --git a/gcc/genmatch.c b/gcc/genmatch.c
index 41951c5..3ff5bdf 100644
--- a/gcc/genmatch.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78619
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78618
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78629
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Ah, it's for the case of len == 0, but that is explicitely allowed:
template
inline void
vec::safe_grow (unsigned len MEM_STAT_DECL)
{
unsigned oldlen = length ();
gcc_checking_assert (oldlen <= len);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78626
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78627
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78599
--- Comment #5 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 40212
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40212&action=edit
fix formatting of patch in comment 3
Oops, sorry about that. Fixed formatting in this versio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78625
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78580
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78599
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Formatting-wise yes (though you could leave the parens around (parm_type ==
NULL) ), but I'm not familiar with this code to actually review it. Plus,
patches should go to gcc-patches.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78559
--- Comment #5 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(insn 37 35 39 7 (set (reg:SI 96)
(sign_extend:SI (subreg:QI (reg:SI 95) 0))) 86 {*extendqisi2_aarch64}
(expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:SI 95)
(nil)))
(insn 39 37 40 7 (set (reg:CC 66
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78510
amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78548
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |middle-end
--- Comment #6 from Aldy Her
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78529
--- Comment #16 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #15)
> I should note I run these tests using the installed compiler rather than
> directly from the build directory
Hi Andrew,
Could you please chec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78532
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78616
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78568
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78625
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78566
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78589
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor ---
I have always thought there was a reason why the outline OMP functions
do not have their abstract origin set, but perhaps there isn't.
I am testing a patch for gcc/cp/error.c that (apart from guarding
agains
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78630
Bug ID: 78630
Summary: Segfault in Libiberty
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78589
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #3)
> Ah, sorry if I misunderstood and got carried away.
BTW, enhancing dumping decls of IPA clones has been discussed to some
length in (a bit forgotten) PR 60761
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78608
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78631
Bug ID: 78631
Summary: [Intel MPX] libmpxwrappers shared library leads to a
non-bounds-preserving memcpy()
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78568
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78572
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71654
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71596
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71190
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70909
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70676
--- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Whould you please mention to what module you are referring? Spi.ii?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71654
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||5.4.0, 7.0
Summary|[6/7 Regr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78619
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78548
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78558
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Component|c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78568
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78551
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78378
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78523
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78345
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78253
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78333
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78224
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78189
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78185
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78127
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78102
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78047
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78032
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78038
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78026
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71190
--- Comment #8 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> Can this still be reproduced with latest trunk?
Yes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78025
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78006
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77919
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70029
--- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka ---
Given that we are in stage 3 again, I propose to postpone this one for GCC 8. I
will try to get to that early next stage1, so it does not slip again.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77905
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77881
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77879
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65654
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka ---
Here I also propose postpone again for GCC 8. I will try to give it priority
next stage1 :(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77849
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77844
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77812
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77790
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77786
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78407
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78620
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=0
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77767
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77754
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78620
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Oops, I missed the first line off that actually does the initialization, sorry!
struct tm tt1;
fprintf(stderr, "no initialization\n");
print(&tt1);
*That* is default-initialization (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77745
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77739
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77665
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78623
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
GCC trunk and EDG both compile it without error.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77659
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77655
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77646
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77648
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77638
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77638
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.5 |6.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77624
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78140
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77605
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77587
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77563
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77578
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
1 - 100 of 222 matches
Mail list logo