[Bug fortran/78059] Pointer to variable length array, debug info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78059 Bernhard Heckel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/24546] [meta-bug] gfortran debugging problems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546 Bug 24546 depends on bug 78059, which changed state. Bug 78059 Summary: Pointer to variable length array, debug info https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78059 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug sanitizer/78267] [7 Regression] libsanitizer breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin16 at r241977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267 --- Comment #47 from Maxim Ostapenko --- (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #45) > > --- Comment #44 from Maxim Ostapenko --- > [...] > >> Otherwise the definition of SANITIZER_OS_TRACE results in > >> libsanitizer/sanitizer

[Bug fortran/78299] [6/7 Regression] ICE in expand_omp_for_static_nochunk, at omp-low.c:9622

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78299 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug sanitizer/77823] [7 Regression] ICE: in ubsan_encode_value, at ubsan.c:137 with -fsanitize=undefined and vector types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77823 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Nov 16 08:28:50 2016 New Revision: 242469 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242469&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR sanitizer/77823 * ubsan.c (ubsan_build_overflow_builtin

[Bug c++/78373] [7 Regression] error: constant not recomputed when ADDR_EXPR changed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78373 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug middle-end/78370] Missing uninitialzed warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78370 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/78348] [7 REGRESSION] 15% performance drop for coremark-pro/nnet-test after r242038

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78348 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Nov 16 08:42:20 2016 New Revision: 242470 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242470&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-11-16 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/78348

[Bug tree-optimization/78348] [7 REGRESSION] 15% performance drop for coremark-pro/nnet-test after r242038

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78348 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/78366] target_clones does not generate resovler function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78366 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- The resolver is only created when there is a call to the function.

[Bug other/78366] target_clones does not generate resovler function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78366 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Note it is created in the caller context, thus double foo(double *, double *, int) __attribute__((target_clones("avx,default"))); double x; int main() { double a,b; x = foo (&a, &b, 1); } creates it i

[Bug middle-end/78306] [CilkPlus] "inlining failed in call to always_inline ‘memset’: function not inlinable" with -fcilkplus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78306 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug middle-end/78333] [5/6/7 Regression] always-inline gnu-inline functions break -finstrument-functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78333 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Known to work|

[Bug target/78364] [7 Regression][ARM] Error: bit-field extends past end of register -- ubfx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78364 --- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Wed Nov 16 09:02:18 2016 New Revision: 242471 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242471&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [ARM] PR target/78364: Add proper restrictions to zero and

[Bug c/78365] [7 Regression] ICE in determine_value_range, at tree-ssa-loo p-niter.c:413

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78365 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- IPA has to deal with argument mismatches (I think I've said this elsewhere).

[Bug sanitizer/78267] [7 Regression] libsanitizer breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin16 at r241977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267 --- Comment #48 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #47 from Maxim Ostapenko --- [...] > Rainer, sorry for a dumb question: are you going to commit your fix for > darwin_availabilityinternal part? Or should I just apply a p

[Bug tree-optimization/78305] Wrong constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78305 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/78364] [7 Regression][ARM] Error: bit-field extends past end of register -- ubfx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78364 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug c++/78323] pathological code generation for long logical expression with temporary objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78323 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status|

[Bug sanitizer/78267] [7 Regression] libsanitizer breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin16 at r241977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267 --- Comment #49 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #48) > > --- Comment #47 from Maxim Ostapenko --- > [...] > > Rainer, sorry for a dumb question: are you going to commit your fix for > > darwin_availab

[Bug sanitizer/78267] [7 Regression] libsanitizer breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin16 at r241977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267 --- Comment #50 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #49 from Iain Sandoe --- [...] > I can do darwin14 (I built 242408 last night with the patches-in-progress + > __BLOCKS__) but that's a little bit more than the minimum >

[Bug tree-optimization/78305] Wrong constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78305 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- So it's negating a * -1073741824 via case MULT_EXPR: if (TYPE_UNSIGNED (type)) break; /* INT_MIN/n * n doesn't overflow while negating one operand it does if n is a power of

[Bug rtl-optimization/78374] New: Segfault in cc1 (arm-eabi) on -O1 (or better)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78374 Bug ID: 78374 Summary: Segfault in cc1 (arm-eabi) on -O1 (or better) Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl

[Bug sanitizer/78267] [7 Regression] libsanitizer breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin16 at r241977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267 --- Comment #51 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #50) > > --- Comment #49 from Iain Sandoe --- > [...] > > I can do darwin14 (I built 242408 last night with the patches-in-progress + > > __BLOCKS__) bu

[Bug debug/78375] New: Fortran, pointer to structure, data_member_location

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78375 Bug ID: 78375 Summary: Fortran, pointer to structure, data_member_location Product: gcc Version: 6.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug tree-optimization/78332] [ARM] Negative costs of ivopts groups

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78332 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug rtl-optimization/78374] Segfault in cc1 (arm-eabi) on -O1 (or better)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78374 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/78319] [7 Regression] PASS->FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 20)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78319 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- It's a matter of costs (here BRANCH_COST and its uses in fold and ifcombine). You don't mention what IL differences your patch causes (I'll check soon myself). For the issue at hand I suggest to XFAIL for a

[Bug tree-optimization/70965] [7 Regression] ICE on released SSA name during IPA SRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70965 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/70965] [7 Regression] ICE on released SSA name during IPA SRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70965 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 40053 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40053&action=edit gcc7-pr70965.patch This untested patch fixes the ICE, but the question is if it is the right spot to do that, o

[Bug tree-optimization/78319] [7 Regression] PASS->FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 20)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78319 --- Comment #6 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) > It's a matter of costs (here BRANCH_COST and its uses in fold and ifcombine). > > You don't mention what IL differences your patch causes (I'

[Bug rtl-optimization/78374] Segfault in cc1 (arm-eabi) on -O1 (or better)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78374 --- Comment #2 from Markus Eisenmann --- Created attachment 40054 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40054&action=edit Preprocessed file Preprocessed file, as requested by ktkachov

[Bug tree-optimization/78319] [7 Regression] PASS->FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 20)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78319 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/78319] [7 Regression] PASS->FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 20)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78319 --- Comment #8 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7) > (In reply to prathamesh3492 from comment #6) > > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) > > > It's a matter of costs (here BRANCH_COST a

[Bug c++/78373] [7 Regression] error: constant not recomputed when ADDR_EXPR changed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78373 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug rtl-optimization/78374] Segfault in cc1 (arm-eabi) on -O1 (or better)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78374 --- Comment #3 from Markus Eisenmann --- Further information on (IMHO) problematic optimization / tests: Option -Og does not cause this segfault (as already written), but the option -Og and -ftree-bit-ccp will show the ICE; using the option -ftr

[Bug sanitizer/78307] [7 Regression] missing symbols in libubsan without changing the soname

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78307 --- Comment #8 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: chefmax Date: Wed Nov 16 11:13:19 2016 New Revision: 242478 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242478&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR sanitizer/78307 * ubsan/ubsan_handlers.cc

[Bug middle-end/71441] [7 regression] gcc.dg/pr44023.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71441 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug debug/78363] [7 Regression] ICE in in force_type_die, at dwarf2out.c:24864

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78363 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Ok, so we eliminate as unused DIE0: DW_TAG_structure_type (0x2c04fb40) abbrev id: 0 offset: 0 mark: 0 DW_AT_name: "" DW_AT_byte_size: 1 DW_AT_decl_file: "t.ii" (0)

[Bug middle-end/71441] [7 regression] gcc.dg/pr44023.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71441 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/78376] New: invalid ARM 'ubfx' instruction generated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78376 Bug ID: 78376 Summary: invalid ARM 'ubfx' instruction generated Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug target/78376] invalid ARM 'ubfx' instruction generated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78376 --- Comment #1 from Arnd Bergmann --- Created attachment 40055 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40055&action=edit preprocessed drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rep.c adding gzipped version of the preprocessed source

[Bug middle-end/78294] [5/6/7 Regression] -fsanitize=thread broken by ignoring __attribute__((tls_model("initial-exec")))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78294 --- Comment #20 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Author: trippels Date: Wed Nov 16 11:21:42 2016 New Revision: 242480 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242480&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix PR78294 - thread sanitizer broken when using ld.gold When o

[Bug middle-end/78294] [5/6/7 Regression] -fsanitize=thread broken by ignoring __attribute__((tls_model("initial-exec")))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78294 --- Comment #21 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Author: trippels Date: Wed Nov 16 11:28:57 2016 New Revision: 242482 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242482&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix PR78294 - thread sanitizer broken when using ld.gold When o

[Bug libstdc++/66742] abort on sorting list with custom allocator that is not stateless

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66742 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rs2740 at gmail dot com --- Comment #8

[Bug libstdc++/78371] list::sort doesn't work with non-default-constructible allocators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78371 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/78294] [5/6/7 Regression] -fsanitize=thread broken by ignoring __attribute__((tls_model("initial-exec")))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78294 --- Comment #22 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Author: trippels Date: Wed Nov 16 11:31:18 2016 New Revision: 242483 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242483&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix PR78294 - thread sanitizer broken when using ld.gold When o

[Bug target/78376] invalid ARM 'ubfx' instruction generated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78376 Arnd Bergmann changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/78364] [7 Regression][ARM] Error: bit-field extends past end of register -- ubfx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78364 Arnd Bergmann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||arnd at linaro dot org --- Comment #5 fr

[Bug fortran/78377] New: [cleanup] gfc_get_tbp_symtree vs. gfc_get_sym_tree

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78377 Bug ID: 78377 Summary: [cleanup] gfc_get_tbp_symtree vs. gfc_get_sym_tree Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug other/78366] target_clones does not generate resovler function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78366 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/78270] [7 Regression] ICE in gimplify_switch_expr, at gimplify.c:2272

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78270 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Wed Nov 16 11:56:58 2016 New Revision: 242485 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242485&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix PR sanitizer/78270 (part 2) PR sanitizer/78270 * gimp

[Bug rtl-optimization/78378] New: [5/6/7 Regression] wrong code when combining shift + mult + zero_extend

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78378 Bug ID: 78378 Summary: [5/6/7 Regression] wrong code when combining shift + mult + zero_extend Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-cod

[Bug sanitizer/78270] [7 Regression] ICE in gimplify_switch_expr, at gimplify.c:2272

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78270 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/78363] [7 Regression] ICE in in force_type_die, at dwarf2out.c:24864

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78363 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- diff --git a/gcc/tree-cfg.c b/gcc/tree-cfg.c index e99e102..e23c8c6 100644 --- a/gcc/tree-cfg.c +++ b/gcc/tree-cfg.c @@ -7054,6 +7054,13 @@ replace_block_vars_by_duplicates (tree block, hash_map *vars_map,

[Bug tree-optimization/21278] Move maximum out of a loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21278 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2013-02-01 18:00:00 |2016-11-16 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Ko

[Bug fortran/41556] [OOP] Errors in applying operator/assignment to an abstract type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41556 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0

[Bug fortran/41579] [OOP] Nesting of SELECT TYPE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41579 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0

[Bug fortran/41581] [OOP] Allocation of a CLASS with SOURCE= does not work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41581 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/78378] [5/6/7 Regression] wrong code when combining shift + mult + zero_extend

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78378 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.5

[Bug fortran/41582] [OOP] Allocation of abstract types requires a type spec or a SOURCE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41582 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0 Summary|Alloc

[Bug fortran/41583] [OOP] TYPE IS rejected because of way vtable index is implemented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41583 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0

[Bug fortran/41585] [OOP] Reject CLASS(T) as component of "TYPE :: T"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41585 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0

[Bug fortran/41586] [OOP] Allocatable _scalars_ are never auto-deallocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41586 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0 Summary|Alloc

[Bug fortran/41587] [OOP] ICE with ALLOCATABLE CLASS components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41587 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0

[Bug fortran/41608] [OOP] ICE with CLASS and invalid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41608 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0 Summary|ICE w

[Bug fortran/41618] [OOP] accepts-invalid with CLASS pointer component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41618 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0

[Bug fortran/41629] [OOP] gimplification error on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41629 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0

[Bug fortran/41631] [OOP] Support CLASS IS () in SELECT TYPE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41631 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0

[Bug fortran/41648] [OOP] Type-bound procedures refused

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41648 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0

[Bug fortran/41656] [OOP] Unresolved GENERIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41656 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0

[Bug fortran/41685] [OOP] internal compiler error: verify_flow_info failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41685 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0

[Bug fortran/41706] [OOP] Calling one TBP as an actual argument of another TBP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41706 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0

[Bug fortran/41714] [OOP] ALLOCATE SOURCE= does not properly copy the value from SOURCE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41714 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0

[Bug fortran/41719] [OOP] invalid: Intrinsic assignment involving polymorphic variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41719 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0

[Bug fortran/41766] [OOP] SELECT TYPE selector as actual argument with INTENT(INOUT)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41766 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0

[Bug fortran/41781] [OOP] bogus undefined label error with SELECT TYPE.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41781 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0

[Bug fortran/41784] [OOP] ICE in load_derived_extensions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41784 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0

[Bug fortran/41800] [OOP] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2789

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41800 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0

[Bug fortran/41873] [OOP] Bogus Error: ABSTRACT INTERFACE must not be referenced...

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41873 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0

[Bug fortran/41937] [OOP] Error in allocating derived type allocatable components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41937 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0

[Bug fortran/42167] [OOP] SELECT TYPE with function return value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42167 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0

[Bug fortran/42053] [OOP] SELECT TYPE: reject duplicate CLASS IS blocks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42053 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0

[Bug fortran/43169] [OOP] gfortran rejects pure procedure with select type construct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43169 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0

[Bug fortran/42353] [OOP] Bogus Error: Name 'vtype$...' at (1) is an ambiguous reference ...

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42353 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0 Summary|[fort

[Bug fortran/43256] [OOP] TBP with missing optional arg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43256 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0

[Bug fortran/43199] [OOP] ICE when reading module file: find_array_spec(): Component not found

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43199 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0

[Bug fortran/43291] [4.5 regression] [OOP] Type mismatch in argument; passed CLASS(t1) to CLASS(t2)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43291 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0

[Bug middle-end/78368] ICE in lookup_decl, at omp-low.c:1071

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78368 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libfortran/78379] New: Processor-specific versions for matmul

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78379 Bug ID: 78379 Summary: Processor-specific versions for matmul Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: libfort

[Bug libfortran/51119] MATMUL slow for large matrices

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51119 --- Comment #43 from Janne Blomqvist --- Compile warnings caused by this patch: cc1: warning: command line option ‘-fno-protect-parens’ is valid for Fortran but not for C cc1: warning: command line option ‘-fstack-arrays’ is valid for Fortran bu

[Bug c++/78369] default parameter ICEs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78369 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/78372] gdb/demangler crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78372 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/78378] [5/6/7 Regression] wrong code when combining shift + mult + zero_extend

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78378 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/78369] default parameter ICEs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78369 --- Comment #2 from Guille --- Yes, somehow I get ICE with -std=c++1z but not without it. Here's 'c++ -v' *** Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=c++ COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/libexec/gcc/x86_64-apple-darwin13.4.0/

[Bug c++/78369] [7 Regression] default parameter ICEs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78369 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Status|WAIT

[Bug middle-end/78333] [5/6/7 Regression] always-inline gnu-inline functions break -finstrument-functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78333 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Nov 16 12:55:02 2016 New Revision: 242487 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242487&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-11-16 Richard Biener PR middle-end/78333 * gim

[Bug middle-end/78333] [5/6 Regression] always-inline gnu-inline functions break -finstrument-functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78333 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.0 Summary|[5/6/7 Regressio

[Bug c/78380] New: GCC crash with internal compiler error: in gen_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:1025

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78380 Bug ID: 78380 Summary: GCC crash with internal compiler error: in gen_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:1025 Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug fortran/40117] [OOP][F2008] Type-bound procedure: allow list after PROCEDURE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40117 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0

  1   2   3   4   5   >