https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59949
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2014-01-26 00:00:00 |2016-10-22
Severity|minor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60487
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Has this been fixed yet?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55496
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55499
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55498
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2012-12-13 00:00:00 |2016-10-22
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63571
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78074
Bug ID: 78074
Summary: gcc-6.2.0 miscompiles calloc reimplementation
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78074
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78033
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71759
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78033
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Patch posted at
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-10/msg00156.html
The patch regtested fine but for
FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/udr3.f90 -O (test for errors, line 16)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78060
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
--- Comment #3 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78072
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10619
Eelis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42490
Eelis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78033
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> The patch regtested fine but for
>
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/udr3.f90 -O (test for errors, line 16)
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/udr3.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
I have overlooked another fai
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61376
--- Comment #2 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Sat Oct 22 12:33:38 2016
New Revision: 241439
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241439&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
2016-10-22 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51864
--- Comment #3 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Sat Oct 22 12:33:38 2016
New Revision: 241439
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241439&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
2016-10-22 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57117
--- Comment #15 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Sat Oct 22 12:33:38 2016
New Revision: 241439
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241439&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
2016-10-22 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61337
--- Comment #5 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Sat Oct 22 12:33:38 2016
New Revision: 241439
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241439&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
2016-10-22 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43366
--- Comment #18 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Sat Oct 22 12:33:38 2016
New Revision: 241439
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241439&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
2016-10-22 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78066
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71322
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |NEW
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78021
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Oct 22 14:04:46 2016
New Revision: 241440
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241440&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-10-22 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/78021
* gfc_comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60487
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78033
--- Comment #11 from Steve Kargl ---
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 12:19:36PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78033
>
> --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> > The patch regtested fine
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71767
--- Comment #33 from Eric Gallager ---
I'm not sure if this is due to the patches from this bug report, or if it's due
to some other change made to GCC recently, but my fork of Emacs now fails to
build with LTO due to a bunch of undefined local s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71767
--- Comment #34 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #33)
> I'm not sure if this is due to the patches from this bug report, or if it's
> due to some other change made to GCC recently, but my fork of Emacs now
> fails to b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78075
Bug ID: 78075
Summary: Need a way to tell pthread_cancel don't to the forced
unwind
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78075
--- Comment #1 from BaiYang ---
pthread_exit too, of course.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78076
Bug ID: 78076
Summary: [7 Regression] Conditional jump or move depends on
uninitialised value @ tree-vect-loop.c:2307
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71620
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71491
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71264
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78075
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78029
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64543
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71767
--- Comment #35 from Jack Howarth ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #33)
> I'm not sure if this is due to the patches from this bug report, or if it's
> due to some other change made to GCC recently, but my fork of Emacs now
> fails to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78075
--- Comment #3 from BaiYang ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> This api is controlled by glibc, please report it there.
Where is it? I need report it again at another bugzilla right?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78075
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to BaiYang from comment #3)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> > This api is controlled by glibc, please report it there.
>
> Where is it? I need report it again at another bugzilla ri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78075
BaiYang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|MOVED |FIXED
--- Comment #5 from BaiYang ---
(In rep
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78075
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |MOVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78077
Bug ID: 78077
Summary: gcc 6.2.0 fails to link temacs from emacs-25.1 using
the Xcode 8 linker
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71767
--- Comment #36 from Jack Howarth ---
(In reply to Jack Howarth from comment #35)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #33)
> > I'm not sure if this is due to the patches from this bug report, or if it's
> > due to some other change made to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78078
Bug ID: 78078
Summary: error on ATOMIC_VAR_INIT with aggregate initializer
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70773
--- Comment #9 from PeteVine ---
It seems the LPATHBench exhibits the same issue.
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/logicchains/LPATHBench/master/c_fast.c
compiled the following way:
gcc -falign-functions=32 -std=gnu99 -O2 -mcpu=cortex-a5 -fom
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78078
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78078
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|rejects-valid |
Summary|error on ATOMIC_VAR_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78078
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78077
--- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth ---
This Xcode 8 linker failure is suppressed when emacs 25.1 is built at -O0, but
occurs for -O1, -O2, -Os and -O3.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71767
--- Comment #37 from Jack Howarth ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #33)
> I'm not sure if this is due to the patches from this bug report, or if it's
> due to some other change made to GCC recently, but my fork of Emacs now
> fails to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78079
Bug ID: 78079
Summary: implicit initialization overrides explicit designated
initializer
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63944
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78079
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78056
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78080
Bug ID: 78080
Summary: chown command (sys/stat.h) fail to change the owner
directory if the return value is not attributed to a
variable.
Product: gcc
Version: 5.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77837
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78056
--- Comment #13 from Alan Modra ---
Thanks Martin, so it is HAVE_AS_POWER9 being undefined, which then results in
TARGET_P9_VECTOR and others being defined to zero. Kelvin's fix of not
defining the builtins when no power9 support is available so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78081
Bug ID: 78081
Summary: -Wmaybe-initialized false-alarm regression for Emacs
regex.c
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78056
--- Comment #14 from Segher Boessenkool ---
I used the following patch yesterday, and it works. Totally
hacky of course, it should be factored to its own function, etc.
===
diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78076
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
int a, b;
void fn1() {
for (; a < 0; ++a) {
b = 0;
for (; b < a; b++)
;
}
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78082
Bug ID: 78082
Summary: [7 Regression] Conditional jump or move depends on
uninitialised value @ c-format.c:3347
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78083
Bug ID: 78083
Summary: wrong mangling for varargs lambdas
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
63 matches
Mail list logo
