https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78003
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78003
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77989
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77988
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77992
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77993
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71311
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
I can confirm the runfail on barcelona (core-avx2 seems fine). As said the
underlying issue was latent, you can easily see if compiling rhfuhf.F w/o
-Ofast fixes it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78003
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77985
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Please post the patch to gcc-patches@ where other people can see this and
comment.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77967
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at redhat dot com
Known to wor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71636
--- Comment #4 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: prathamesh3492
Date: Mon Oct 17 08:48:43 2016
New Revision: 241229
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241229&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-10-17 Prathamesh Kulkarni
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77989
amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |amker at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71636
--- Comment #5 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed on trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77995
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon Oct 17 08:54:03 2016
New Revision: 241231
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241231&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/77995
Backport from mainline
2016
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77938
--- Comment #5 from Ivan Sorokin ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> Related (maybe a dup really) to PR 59813.
I agree. The linked bug is just another manifestation of the same issue.
Regarding my question about excessive stack fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78004
Bug ID: 78004
Summary: g++ 6.2.1 segfaults when compiling qt 4.8.7 on arm
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78004
--- Comment #1 from Natanael Copa ---
Qt is built without precompiled headers. (with -no-pch)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78004
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78005
Bug ID: 78005
Summary: [7 Regression] 172.mgrid miscompares
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78005
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Miles
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78005
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[7 Regression] 172.mgrid|[7 Regression] 172.mgrid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68860
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
So with LTO early debug I now get proper debug decls but still no locations for
the parameters
<1><1ff>: Abbrev Number: 10 (DW_TAG_subprogram)
<200> DW_AT_abstract_origin: <0x28b>
<204> DW_AT_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77989
--- Comment #4 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The vectorized code looks good to me. It is in VRP2 that GCC generates below
expression:
MEM[&MEM[(void *)&b + 49B] + 0B];
(gdb) call debug_tree(*tp)
unit size
align 8 symtab 0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77995
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78005
amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |amker at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68860
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Yes, see the #c4 partial patch and the following comments.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78007
Bug ID: 78007
Summary: Important loop from 482.sphinx3 is not vectorized
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78007
--- Comment #1 from Yuri Rumyantsev ---
Created attachment 39821
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39821&action=edit
test-case to reproduce
It is sufficient to compiler it with -Ofast option on x86 platform.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68860
--- Comment #17 from Richard Biener ---
I have a fix for that, queued into early LTO debug patches. But the testcase
still fails...
foo (arg7=arg7@entry=30, arg6=, arg5=,
arg4=, arg3=, arg2=,
arg1=, arg8=7)
at
/space/rguenther/src
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78007
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78008
Bug ID: 78008
Summary: Forbid or document #pragma pack(0)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: preprocessor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78004
--- Comment #3 from Natanael Copa ---
Created attachment 39822
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39822&action=edit
qdeclarativeanimation.ii.gz
It segfaults with -O1 and -O2 but not with -Os or -O0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78004
--- Comment #4 from Natanael Copa ---
It seems to be reproducible on 32 bit x86 too with:
$ g++ -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=g++
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/i586-alpine-linux-musl/6.2.1/lto-wrapper
Target: i586-alpine-linux-mus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77987
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Oct 17 12:00:44 2016
New Revision: 241235
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241235&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR77987 Fix unique_ptr::reset(U) for T != U
PR libstdc++/77987
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78004
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41861
--- Comment #12 from Roman Fietze ---
Sorry if it is inappropriate to ask for any changes, but how can it be, that
there is no fix for this bug for years in any of the GCC releases?
With this bug condition_variable::wait_until is completely unu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41861
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Roman Fietze from comment #12)
> Sorry if it is inappropriate to ask for any changes, but how can it be, that
> there is no fix for this bug for years in any of the GCC releases?
Because it'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77998
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Oct 17 12:23:09 2016
New Revision: 241236
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241236&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR77998 Remove std::thread::_Invoker::result_type
PR libstdc++/7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78004
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|g++ 6.2.1 segfaults when|[6/7 Regression] g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77998
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77987
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Fixed on trunk so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77999
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||emsr at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66756
Melven.Roehrig-Zoellner at DLR dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Melven.Roehrig-Zoe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78006
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78009
Bug ID: 78009
Summary: [OOP] polymorphic component of derived type array
slice handling error
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78004
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #7 from Richard E
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78004
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #8 from Richard Earns
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77966
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Yes, the reason is that aggressive loop optimizations are disabled if a
-fsanitize is enabled.
If you want to catch the out of bounds access to wq_lock array, you can use
-fsanitize=undefined.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77943
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Mon Oct 17 13:17:53 2016
New Revision: 241239
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241239&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Do not merge BBs with a different EH landing pads (PR
Backported
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77943
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Mon Oct 17 13:19:04 2016
New Revision: 241240
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241240&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Do not merge BBs with a different EH landing pads (PR
Backported
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77943
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78010
Bug ID: 78010
Summary: --Wsuggest-override reports a redundant warning on a
'final' method
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65856
--- Comment #13 from Alexander Volkov ---
There was no response, so I created a new bugreport:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78010
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78004
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77988
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Oct 17 13:46:34 2016
New Revision: 241242
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241242&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-10-17 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/77988
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77988
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77966
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77937
--- Comment #14 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Mon Oct 17 14:22:22 2016
New Revision: 241243
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241243&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2016-10-17 Bill Schmidt
Backport from mainline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77937
--- Comment #15 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Mon Oct 17 14:24:21 2016
New Revision: 241244
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241244&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2016-10-17 Bill Schmidt
Backport from mainline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77937
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77992
--- Comment #15 from Kangjie Lu ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #14)
> Re-opening as an enhacement request for sth like -fexplict-padding adding
> artificial fields to structures padding.
>
> Patches welcome (hint: look into stor-la
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78011
Bug ID: 78011
Summary: Compiler error when initializing a member of template
type where the second template argument is a typedef
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77994
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Oct 17 14:39:23 2016
New Revision: 241245
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241245&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR77994 Convert std::sample size argument to suitable type
PR li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78011
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78012
Bug ID: 78012
Summary: -mfpxx produces assembly code using odd FP registers
on MIPS
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78012
--- Comment #1 from Aurelien Jarno ---
Created attachment 39824
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39824&action=edit
Reduced testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77943
--- Comment #12 from Mathias Stearn ---
We were hoping to replace many places in our code that does the following with
noexcept attributes on functions:
> try {doStuffThatShouldntThrow();} catch(...) {std::terminate();}
We wanted to take advant
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77994
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78013
Bug ID: 78013
Summary: unexpected 'has no IMPLICIT type' error for a
type-bound function returning a procedure pointer
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77994
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Oct 17 16:50:37 2016
New Revision: 241249
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241249&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport fixes to std::experimental::sample
PR libstdc++/77994
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77322
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Oct 17 16:50:53 2016
New Revision: 241252
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241252&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add noexcept to std::function swap
Backport from mainline:
2016-08-22 J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72820
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Oct 17 16:50:43 2016
New Revision: 241250
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241250&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Use ::new to avoid finding overloaded operator new
Backport from mainlin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67091
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72820
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Oct 17 17:03:19 2016
New Revision: 241264
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241264&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Use ::new to avoid finding overloaded operator new
Backport from mainlin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77994
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Oct 17 17:03:09 2016
New Revision: 241263
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241263&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport fixes to std::experimental::sample
PR libstdc++/77994
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77322
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Oct 17 17:03:31 2016
New Revision: 241266
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241266&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add noexcept to std::function swap
Backport from mainline:
2016-08-22 J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72820
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77322
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.3
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77641
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78013
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61420
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61420
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78000
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
As I've said before, we have to stop doing individual ad hoc fixes for
bugs like this; there are too many of them. We have to work out the
general principles for which warnings should or s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77992
--- Comment #16 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
Obviously any fields implicitly inserted like that must be ignored by the
front ends when processing positional initializers - an initializer { 1,
2, 3 } must initialize three explicitly d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77308
--- Comment #11 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Author: edlinger
Date: Mon Oct 17 17:46:59 2016
New Revision: 241273
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241273&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-10-17 Bernd Edlinger
PR target/77308
* confi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78013
--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Mon Oct 17 17:52:05 2016
New Revision: 241274
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241274&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-10-17 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/61420
PR fortran/78013
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61420
--- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Mon Oct 17 17:52:05 2016
New Revision: 241274
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241274&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-10-17 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/61420
PR fortran/7801
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77987
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Oct 17 18:21:26 2016
New Revision: 241276
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241276&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR77987 Fix unique_ptr::reset(U) for T != U
PR libstdc++/77987
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77987
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77656
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> Perhaps tsubst of TEMPLATE_PARM_INDEX instead of just
> return convert_from_reference (unshare_expr (arg));
> also convert it to the TEMPLATE_PARM_INDEX's type (i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78014
Bug ID: 78014
Summary: -Wformat -vs- size_t
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78014
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78014
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
I think this is essentially the same as bug 77970 - making such warnings
smarter about the case of standard typedefs.
Of course an expression resulting from sizeof must be considered
appro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77978
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Mon Oct 17 19:57:12 2016
New Revision: 241279
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241279&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-10-17 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/77978
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78014
--- Comment #3 from Tom Tromey ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #2)
> Likewise an expression where the user did "typedef size_t my_size_t;" and
> then used my_size_t. And what about expressions resulting from arithmetic
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77978
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Mon Oct 17 21:29:31 2016
New Revision: 241280
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241280&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-10-17 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/77978
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77916
--- Comment #4 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Mon Oct 17 22:08:56 2016
New Revision: 241281
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241281&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2016-10-17 Bill Schmidt
PR tree-optimization/77916
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77978
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Mon Oct 17 23:22:54 2016
New Revision: 241286
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241286&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-10-17 Steven G. Kargl
Backport from trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77978
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298
--- Comment #28 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue Oct 18 04:14:25 2016
New Revision: 241294
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241294&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-10-17 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortran/48298
* io/io
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
