https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59558
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51392
--- Comment #4 from cyp561 at gmail dot com ---
Is there any case in which a function returning a structure may not elide the
return value copy to being passed by invisible reference?
If not, I think it is either a bug that the code fails, or a b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77988
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77991
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77995
--- Comment #6 from Igor Kozhukhov ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #4)
> If BUILD_CONFIG is empty, then a possible fix is at:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2016-10/msg00278.html
thanks a lot for proposed patch - i can confirm: i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77999
Bug ID: 77999
Summary: GCC leaks system header diagnostic about reserved
names.
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77992
--- Comment #10 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
If you care about information in bytes that are not part of a field with
other semantic significance, you should use -Werror=padded to get errors
on structs with padding and use that infor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77995
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|solaris |x86_64-sun-solaris2.*
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78000
Bug ID: 78000
Summary: -Wimplicit-function-declaration inhibited with macro
from system headers
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnost
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77992
--- Comment #11 from Andreas Schwab ---
The problem with that strategy is that padding is architecture dependent, and
care must be taken not to introduce ABI breakage.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77992
--- Comment #12 from Kangjie Lu ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #11)
> The problem with that strategy is that padding is architecture dependent,
> and care must be taken not to introduce ABI breakage.
Agreed. Or a developer will hav
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77992
--- Comment #13 from Kangjie Lu ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #10)
> If you care about information in bytes that are not part of a field with
> other semantic significance, you should use -Werror=padded to get errors
> o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298
--- Comment #26 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Oct 16 16:29:46 2016
New Revision: 241216
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241216&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-10-16 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortran/48298
* trans
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78001
Bug ID: 78001
Summary: [7 Regression] ncurses build error
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64354
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78001
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298
--- Comment #27 from Jerry DeLisle ---
The patch in comment 26 addressed the behavior of inquire(iolength= ) when
derived types with User Defined procedures are in the Output List.
The only other case I see not addressed yet is the size= specifi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64322
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78001
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
So I think GCC is correct here. A is a non-dependent base so it can be looked
at definition time. m_fn1 is not a const qualified either.
Does other compiler reject:
class A {
protected:
void m_fn1();
};
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78001
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78001
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
And the error message is horrible.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78001
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #3)
> And the error message is horrible.
The only part of the error message which seems really horrible is the
"" part which is related to bug 54948 (there seems
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77897
--- Comment #3 from Bill Long ---
It would appear the customer system has
> /usr/bin/as --version
GNU assembler (GNU Binutils; SUSE Linux Enterprise 12) 2.25.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78001
--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Well,
markus@x4 ~ % clang++ -c n.ii
n.ii:6:24: error: member function 'm_fn1' not viable: 'this' argument has type
'const B', but function is not marked const
void m_fn2() const { m_fn1(); }
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64886
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|hppa*-*-hpux* |hppa*-*-hpux*
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77996
--- Comment #11 from Yichao Yu ---
The case pointed out is fixed in https://reviews.llvm.org/rL284336 although as
expected that doesn't fix the error. Still not sure whose bug is this...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77915
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Oct 16 18:16:29 2016
New Revision: 241217
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241217&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-10-16 Thomas Koenig
Backport from trunk
PR fort
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77915
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77991
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77991
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78002
Bug ID: 78002
Summary: gcc.target/aarch64/stack-checking.c ICEs with
-mabi=ilp32
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78002
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37139
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sun Oct 16 20:13:32 2016
New Revision: 241222
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241222&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ada/37139
PR ada/67205
* common.opt (-ftram
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67205
--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sun Oct 16 20:13:32 2016
New Revision: 241222
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241222&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ada/37139
PR ada/67205
* common.opt (-ftra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37139
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64031
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67205
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
--- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77938
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||59813
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77999
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77998
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77551
Frédéric Buclin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70019
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.2 |6.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35514
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.2 |6.3
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28628
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.2 |6.3
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65642
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.2 |6.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66487
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.2 |6.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39589
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.2 |6.3
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49857
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.2 |6.3
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71629
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58796
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.2 |6.3
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68749
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.2 |6.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71629
--- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Is this the same bug at all? If not, please open a new PR.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78003
Bug ID: 78003
Summary: c++17: ICE in build_over_call, at cp/call.c:7847
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63644
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64270
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
werpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe/gcc-7.0.0_alpha20161016/work/gcc-7-20161016/libitm/method-gl.cc:
In member function virtual void
{anonymous}::gl_wt_dispatch::ITM_WaRU8(_ITM_TYPE_U8*, _ITM_TYPE_U8)':
/var/tmp/portage/cross-powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe/gcc-7.0.0_alpha20161016/work/gcc-7-20161016/libitm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71629
--- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #8)
> Well, snippets from #c0 and #c2 still make the latest snapshot ICE:
Hrm, in comment 5 it all worked for me. I'll test again.
> And I still can't bootstra
57 matches
Mail list logo
