https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33244
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
The only loop I see in this file now is one which contains a call to sqrt and
logf.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70955
--- Comment #24 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016, vries at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70955
>
> --- Comment #23 from Tom de Vries ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76490
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Aug 24 07:39:42 2016
New Revision: 239729
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239729&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-08-24 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77332
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77357
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77353
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Please always provide complete testcases that can be compiled.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34114
amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69848
amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 69848, which changed state.
Bug 69848 Summary: poor vectorization of a loop from SPEC2006 464.h264ref
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69848
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72817
amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77317
--- Comment #2 from rts at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rts
Date: Wed Aug 24 07:53:07 2016
New Revision: 239730
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239730&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR testsuite/77317
gcc/testsuite/
* lib/target-supports
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77356
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77361
Bug ID: 77361
Summary: sparc - unrecognizable insn in __fixsfdi
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77361
--- Comment #1 from Zoltan HERPAI ---
(In reply to Zoltan HERPAI from comment #0)
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to build a cross-compiler for sparc, however libgcc build fails
> with the following error:
>
> -
> /openwrt/build_dir/toolchain-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77362
Bug ID: 77362
Summary: [7 Regression] [graphite] ICE in
sese_build_liveouts_use w/ -O2 -floop-nest-optimize
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77261
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #4 from Janne Blomqvist ---
> Patch here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-08/msg01630.html
>
> Could you Rainer verify that it works on Solaris/SPARC? It *should* d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77363
Bug ID: 77363
Summary: Missing debug information in DWARF
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: c++
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65068
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
And by default we see this
.L4:
add x3, x5, x1
add x1, x1, 1
ldr w2, [x4, x3, lsl 2]
cmp w0, w1
add w2, w2, 1
str w2, [x4, x3, l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64971
--- Comment #18 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #16)
> GCC 5.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
This is still open on GCC-5 - Do we want to take Renlin's fix into GCC-5 or do
we want to push t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77359
--- Comment #2 from Dominik Vogt ---
It's a bit awkward because I don't have access to an AIX machine right now.
What's the "configure" line fron config.log, please?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77353
--- Comment #4 from Berni ---
Created attachment 39491
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39491&action=edit
GCC 5.4.0 build output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77353
--- Comment #3 from Berni ---
Created attachment 39490
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39490&action=edit
main.cpp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77353
--- Comment #5 from Berni ---
Created attachment 39492
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39492&action=edit
GCC 5.4.0 listing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77353
--- Comment #7 from Berni ---
Created attachment 39494
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39494&action=edit
GCC 6.2.0 listing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77353
--- Comment #6 from Berni ---
Created attachment 39493
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39493&action=edit
GCC 6.2.0 build output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77353
--- Comment #8 from Berni ---
With GCC 5.4.0 comparison is done between two 8-bit registers r24 and r25, as
expected.
With GCC 6.2.0 additionally registers r19 and r25 are loaded with 0 and 16-bit
comparison between register pairs (r18, r19) an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77363
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77362
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77358
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77364
Bug ID: 77364
Summary: -fnon-call-exceptions does not work
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77365
Bug ID: 77365
Summary: Wrong result with -fcaller-saves on i386
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77365
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i?86-*-*
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77365
--- Comment #2 from Ole Streicher ---
Created attachment 39497
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39497&action=edit
Preprocessed source file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77365
--- Comment #3 from Ole Streicher ---
# gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/i686-linux-gnu/6/lto-wrapper
Target: i686-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Debian 6.2.0-1'
--wi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77365
--- Comment #4 from Ole Streicher ---
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/i686-linux-gnu/6/lto-wrapper
Target: i686-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Debian 6.2.0-1'
--with-bugurl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77366
Bug ID: 77366
Summary: Rev. 2ac4967 prevents loop unrolling for s390
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77367
Bug ID: 77367
Summary: Duck-typing error not detected when using CRTP
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71026
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77366
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77283
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdapp at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77367
Yu-Hang Tang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77283
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64*-*-*, s390x-*-*
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77357
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77364
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77367
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinsk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71026
--- Comment #3 from Wilco ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #2)
> The transforms
>
> int f4(float x) { return (1.0f / x) < 0.0f; } // -> x < 0.0f
> int f5(float x) { return (x / 2.0f) <= 0.0f; }// -> x <= 0.0f
>
> can be do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77368
Bug ID: 77368
Summary: Private static member visible to templated subclass
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77270
--- Comment #10 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Wed Aug 24 14:59:43 2016
New Revision: 239737
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239737&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/77270
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-28.c: Also
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70134
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
The reason why it is missed on the tree level is due to the code being
undefined. In that it uses uninitialized variables like:
if (iter_5(D) >= itmx_6(D))
goto ;
else
goto ;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77369
Bug ID: 77369
Summary: incorrect noexcept specification deduction
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77369
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77368
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
There are several bugs related to access checking in templates, this is a dup
of one of them.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77368
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58993
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||albin.olsson at volvocars dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77317
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77289
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77289
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
And this 208 vs. sfp is created by combine:
Trying 76 -> 77:
Successfully matched this instruction:
(parallel [
(set (reg:SF 33 1)
(mem:SF (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 113 sfp)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77360
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77370
Bug ID: 77370
Summary: missing -Wignored-qualiifiers on a bogus const
reference
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77371
Bug ID: 77371
Summary: ICE in force_constant_size, at gimplify.c:671 (... and
others)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77371
--- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
$ cat z2.f90
program p
integer, allocatable :: z
!$acc parallel
z = 1
!$acc end parallel
print *, z
end
$ gfortran-7-20160821 -fopenacc z2.f90
z2.f90:2:0:
integer, allocatable :: z
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77371
--- Comment #2 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Related :
$ cat z6.f90
program p
integer, allocatable :: n
!$acc parallel reduction (+:n) private(n)
!$acc end parallel
end
$ gfortran-7-20160821 -fopenacc z6.f90
z6.f90:3:0:
!$acc parallel redu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77372
Bug ID: 77372
Summary: ICE in simplify_ieee_selected_real_kind, at
fortran/simplify.c:7049
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77373
Bug ID: 77373
Summary: __attribute__((vector_size(N))) fails on AIX
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77373
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77374
Bug ID: 77374
Summary: ICE in resolve_omp_atomic, at fortran/openmp.c:3949
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70955
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #25 from Tom de Vries
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77374
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77372
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77358
--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Wed Aug 24 19:33:14 2016
New Revision: 239740
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239740&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-08-24 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/77358
* resolve.c (res
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77372
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Thous shalt dereference NULL pointers.
Index: simplify.c
===
--- simplify.c (revision 239737)
+++ simplify.c (working copy)
@@ -704
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77358
--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Wed Aug 24 19:45:56 2016
New Revision: 239741
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239741&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-08-24 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/77358
* resolve.c (res
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77358
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77371
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74755
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74755
--- Comment #2 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The target is nvptx-none, specifically when it is built as an offloaded target
for OpenACC. Thomas thinks the problem is in newlib rather than gcc though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77327
--- Comment #3 from Fritz Reese ---
> interface.c:403 is
> if ( (d1 && (d1->attr.flavor == FL_STRUCT || d1->attr.flavor == FL_UNION)
>
> and I believe d->attr.flavor is the item used after freed.
This is correct, and the reason is clear when y
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77330
--- Comment #13 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Wed, 24 Aug 2016, bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de wrote:
> It is only necessary if __float128 is declared a base type.
> But __m512 is no base type, right?
It's clear that __m512 shoul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77330
--- Comment #14 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Wed, 24 Aug 2016, bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de wrote:
> glibc's malloc returns 128-bit aligned on x86-64-linux-gnu.
> but what does it return on windows?
glibc does not support Wind
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71026
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Wed, 24 Aug 2016, ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> int f4(float x) { return (1.0f / x) < 0.0f; } // -> x < 0.0f
Requires -fno-trapping-math, as this could lose an overflow or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77292
--- Comment #14 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #10)
> > t.c:4:13: warning: logical not is only applied to the left hand side of
> > comparison [-Wlogical-not-parentheses]
> >return !a == (a < b);
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50250
--- Comment #4 from Tom Payerle ---
In the interest of actually getting this fixed, may I suggest the following
revised wording:
Search the library named @var{library} when linking. (The second
alternative with the library as a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77375
Bug ID: 77375
Summary: constant object with mutable subobject allocated in
read-only memory
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77289
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50250
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77376
Bug ID: 77376
Summary: GCC segfaults/returns bogus error (depending on
version) when calling a member function from a generic
lambda with a captured this without using "this->"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77327
--- Comment #4 from Vittorio Zecca ---
The reproducer I proposed comes from testcase gfortran.dg/import4.f90
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66096
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77327
--- Comment #5 from Vittorio Zecca ---
The test case you propose, dec_structure_13.f90, does not trigger the asan
memory checker.
As I wrote before, the test case gfortran.dg/import4.f90 does trigger
the asan memory checker.
In your test case I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69047
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm, aarch64|
Component|rtl-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69033
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77376
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61636
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tinab at hush dot ai
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77376
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67886
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Severity|m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67886
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77327
--- Comment #6 from Vittorio Zecca ---
After applying the proposed patch the asan memory checker did not report
any memory fault, in particular the heap-use-after-free in interface.c
Fritz, do you have a -fsanitize=address version of gfortran, i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61636
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
98 matches
Mail list logo
