https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77339
Bug ID: 77339
Summary: ICE on invalid C++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu: in
cp_parser_type_name, at cp/parser.c:16532
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77305
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Aug 23 07:21:36 2016
New Revision: 239683
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239683&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-08-23 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/77305
* sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27336
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Aug 23 07:23:19 2016
New Revision: 239684
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239684&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-08-23 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/27336
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27336
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77305
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50818
--- Comment #9 from Steven Shi ---
GCC6.10 lto fails to support below MS ABI buildin of va list, but GCC5 works.
This is a regression bug for GCC6. I suspect current GCC trunk also has this
regression bug.
__builtin_ms_va_list ap;
__builtin_m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77340
Bug ID: 77340
Summary: Invalid (Stack Smashing) Code Generated In Simple
Cases With Debug-Mode Vectors
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77341
Bug ID: 77341
Summary: GCC6 va_list MS ABI buildin regression bug
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77340
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77340
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77340
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77342
Bug ID: 77342
Summary: Use abi_tag on Debug Mode namespace
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77343
Bug ID: 77343
Summary: ICE in dwarf2out_frame_debug_expr, at dwarf2cfi.c:1596
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49636
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77310
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77323
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77333
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Try -fno-lifetime-dse and/or -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77334
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77337
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77339
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77338
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Target Milestone|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77341
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77341
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70955
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven.shi at intel dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60936
--- Comment #20 from __vic ---
Patch attachment 38319 solves the problem for GCC 6.2 as well
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69470
Darko Veberic changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||darko.veberic at ijs dot si
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71771
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Aug 23 10:13:26 2016
New Revision: 239691
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239691&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Implement resolution of LWG DR 685 precisely
PR libstdc++/71771
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77332
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63238
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70955
--- Comment #16 from Steven Shi ---
How to checkout the 6.3 code from GCC trunk? I hope to verify this fix on Uefi
firmware GCC LTO build.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70955
--- Comment #17 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Steven Shi from comment #16)
> How to checkout the 6.3 code from GCC trunk? I hope to verify this fix on
> Uefi firmware GCC LTO build.
The patch is not checked in as I believe the fundamental
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70955
--- Comment #18 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 39484
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39484&action=edit
Tentative patch using attributes ms_abi/sysv_abi
not build or regression tested yet, but at least ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77344
Bug ID: 77344
Summary: Internal Compiler Error with arch knl
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77345
Bug ID: 77345
Summary: [7 Regression] Segmentation fault w/ -misel -O1 (and
above)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60936
--- Comment #21 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Yes, but it removes functionality, and we don't want to do that
unconditionally.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71771
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60936
--- Comment #22 from __vic ---
Of course. It's comment for people like me who needs solution right now
(actually since 2014...)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77338
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77339
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77346
Bug ID: 77346
Summary: [7 Regression] ICE in push_reload, at reload.c:1350
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77339
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
I'm pretty sure this started with r181118:
commit 370478b178a3bdf01988c16782c90add8aea26aa
Author: dodji
Date: Mon Nov 7 21:28:50 2011 +
PR c++/45114 - Support C++11 alias-declaration
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77339
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
clang++ says
w.C:4:25: error: type 'A' (aka 'int') cannot be used prior to '::' because
it has no members
template < typename X > A < X >::a;
^
w.C:1:23: note: type alias template 'A'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77332
--- Comment #2 from Jeremy ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> I can't reproduce it. It seems to happen in stage2 (-g -gtoggle) and I'm
> past that trying to reproduce (also that's the only stage where checking
> code is run).
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71014
--- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Author: jakub
> Date: Fri Aug 19 15:30:33 2016
> New Revision: 239620
> ...
Is it fixed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71771
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72798
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Without a test showing the problem I'll close this PR as INVALID.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62181
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
W E Brown c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77308
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
pass.
Vries,
I tried apply your patch on latest gcc trunk, build and install the new gcc7,
it still cannot work. Below is my test case.
$ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 7.0.0 20160823 (experimental)
$ cat test2.c
#include
int
__attribute__((ms_abi))
foo (int n, ...)
{
__builtin_ms_va_list ap;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77347
Bug ID: 77347
Summary: [6 Regression] Incorrect auto deduction failure in
template class member function
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69620
--- Comment #2 from Tiago Brusamarello ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Does this fail on 5.4.0? 4.9.4 was the last release of 4.9
We've tested it so far on GCC version 5.3 for PPC64 platforms. In this case the
test result is U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70955
--- Comment #20 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Steven Shi from comment #19)
> (In reply to vries from comment #18)
> > Created attachment 39484 [details]
> > Tentative patch using attributes ms_abi/sysv_abi
> >
> > not build or re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77334
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Aug 23 13:15:12 2016
New Revision: 239698
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239698&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libstdc++/77334 move assign RB trees of non-copyable types
PR li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77330
--- Comment #2 from mikulas at artax dot karlin.mff.cuni.cz ---
Glibc doesn't support types __float128 and decimal float. Only GCC does.
Glibc can't be responsible for decisions made by the GCC developers. Glibc has
been aliging allocated memory
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70955
--- Comment #21 from Steven Shi ---
Vries,
Sorry, my bad. I didn't apply your patch completely. Yes, your patch works.
And with your patch, my UEFU firmware gcc lto build pass and boot successfully.
Hope we could check in a formal fix ASAP, becau
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77330
--- Comment #3 from mikulas at artax dot karlin.mff.cuni.cz ---
BTW. gcc thinks that with -m32, allocated memory is aligned to 4 bytes and with
-m64 and -mx32, allocated memory is aligned to 16 bytes. You can try to compile
this program into assem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70955
--- Comment #22 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to vries from comment #18)
> Created attachment 39484 [details]
> Tentative patch using attributes ms_abi/sysv_abi
>
> not build or regression tested yet, but at least makes test-case pass.
LGTM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61460
Stephan Bergmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sbergman at redhat dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70909
Stephan Bergmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sbergman at redhat dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72851
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Aug 23 13:49:00 2016
New Revision: 239699
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239699&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-08-23 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76783
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Aug 23 13:49:00 2016
New Revision: 239699
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239699&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-08-23 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72851
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77347
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.3
Summary|[6 Regression] I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77346
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77345
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77286
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Aug 23 13:58:19 2016
New Revision: 239700
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239700&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-08-23 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/77286
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77348
Bug ID: 77348
Summary: -march=skylake still not working because config.gcc
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70909
--- Comment #2 from Marcel Böhme ---
Here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-05/msg00105.html
Pending review.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77348
David Flater changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dflater at nist dot gov
--- Comment #1 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77334
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Aug 23 14:20:50 2016
New Revision: 239701
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239701&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libstdc++/77334 move assign RB trees of non-copyable types
PR li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77334
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Aug 23 14:21:16 2016
New Revision: 239702
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239702&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libstdc++/77334 move assign RB trees of non-copyable types
PR li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77334
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77349
Bug ID: 77349
Summary: AIX DWARF debugging offset in 64 bit mode
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77349
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-debug
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69847
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wdijkstr at arm dot com
--- Comment #27 from Wil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61409
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69789
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Markwalder ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7)
> (In reply to Thomas Markwalder from comment #5)
> > A bit more digging reveals that in the logic expression which fails:
> >
> > {{{
> > // Check if we
86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160823 (experimental) [trunk revision 239693] (GCC)
$
$ g++-trunk -c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61409
--- Comment #19 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Also, unless I'm missing something, in Jeff's analysis, I see no reference to
j, which plays a pivotal role.
In the testcase in comment 14, we can see that the guard for ptr_14 is actually
[i && j==0]:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61409
--- Comment #21 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Created attachment 39487
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39487&action=edit
even more^2 reduced testcase
Smaller testcase without any structure nonsense and even less variables.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68972
--- Comment #6 from Bill Seurer ---
This test started passing today. I am not sure which update fixed it, though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61409
--- Comment #20 from Aldy Hernandez ---
If anyone is interested, here is an even smaller testcase:
int *rw;
int line_height;
int pixel_width;
int text_cols;
int width1, width2, width3;
void *pointer;
void f (int i, int j)
{
void *ptr;
if (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77330
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
When there isn't whole-implementation, including library, support for the
types as "basic types" (see the resolution to DR#445), you need to
consider them as some other kind of type, analog
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77308
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wdijkstr at arm dot com
--- Comment #10 from Wil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72775
Matteo Bertello changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mbertello@feralinteractive.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55496
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77323
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61112
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
Known
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60488
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77334
--- Comment #5 from bogdan ---
From now on, "fast" shall have a new degree of comparison beyond the
superlative, spelled "jw-fast" (alternative spelling when appearing in text on
gcc.gnu.org: "redi-fast").
Cheers!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65182
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||24639
--- Comment #5 from Manuel L
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61428
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72781
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52602
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70736
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70955
--- Comment #23 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #22)
> (In reply to vries from comment #18)
> > Created attachment 39484 [details]
> > Tentative patch using attributes ms_abi/sysv_abi
> >
> > not build or regressio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69860
--- Comment #11 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
And with "kind=4" instead of "kind=1", i.e. with testfile z1.f90 ?
for n in `seq 1 1000`
do
gfortran-7-20160821 -O2 -mavx -c z1.f90
done > list 2>&1
grep 'internal compiler' list | wc
9465
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70853
--- Comment #3 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Another testcase :
$ cat z7.f90
program p
integer, parameter :: m = 2, n = 3
real, target :: a(m*n)
real, pointer :: z(:,:) => null()
z(1:m,1:n) => null()
end
$ gfortran-7-20160821 z7.f90
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68567
--- Comment #5 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
> We must be using drastically different compilers.
No, I've simply forgotten to include a subcatalog with testfiles zz*.
Sorry for my blotchiness. The patch looks good and works.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77350
Bug ID: 77350
Summary: ICE in truthvalue_conversion, at fortran/convert.c:65
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
