https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72830
Bug ID: 72830
Summary: istream::seekg should not reset eofbit if -std=c++98
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72831
Bug ID: 72831
Summary: [7 Regression] Conditional jump or move depends on
uninitialised value: regno_in_use_p (lra-spills.c:701)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70524
--- Comment #9 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Mon Aug 8 08:11:29 2016
New Revision: 239230
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239230&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-08-08 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71151
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71151
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72832
Bug ID: 72832
Summary: [OOP] ALLOCATE with SOURCE fails to allocate requested
dimensions
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70524
--- Comment #10 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Mon Aug 8 08:20:07 2016
New Revision: 239231
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239231&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-08-08 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70524
--- Comment #11 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Mon Aug 8 08:24:22 2016
New Revision: 239232
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239232&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-08-08 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72832
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71910
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72802
--- Comment #5 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Mon Aug 8 09:05:16 2016
New Revision: 239233
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239233&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[RS6000] PR72802 part 1, fix constraints for lxssp/stxssp
We can't use "o"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72802
--- Comment #6 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Mon Aug 8 09:06:49 2016
New Revision: 239234
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239234&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[RS6000] PR72802 part 2, reload ICE
After fixing the constraint problem, we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72831
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
With --track-origins=yes (compiling tramp3d-v4.cpp with -O3 on x86_64):
==30059== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==30059==at 0xC216B0: regno_in_use_p (lra-spills.c:701)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72833
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72833
Bug ID: 72833
Summary: [7 regression] error in fortran/parse.c
(unexpected_eof) on Mac OS X 10.7
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67097
--- Comment #6 from Gilles Gouaillardet
---
as a side note, would you be interested in me providing a patch so
gcov-tool merge
can merge n directories (currently, we are limited to n=2) ?
i would implement that via a binary tree, so under the h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72800
--- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Aug 8 09:40:17 2016
New Revision: 239235
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239235&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2016-08-08 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/72800
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72800
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70524
--- Comment #12 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Waiting one week for regressions before closing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72825
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68762
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72698
--- Comment #7 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Mon Aug 8 09:49:37 2016
New Revision: 239236
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239236&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-08-08 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60585
--- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson ---
This was fixed for gcc-5.0 by r218091, i.e. PR61190.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71936
--- Comment #6 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Mon Aug 8 09:58:21 2016
New Revision: 239237
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239237&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
2016-08-08 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71936
--- Comment #7 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Waiting one week for regressions to occur before backporting to gcc-6 .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72698
--- Comment #8 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Waiting one week for regressions to occur before backporting to gcc-5/6.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71976
--- Comment #9 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Aug 8 10:06:15 2016
New Revision: 239238
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239238&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from 2016-07-29 trunk r238863.
PR rtl-optimizati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71976
--- Comment #10 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Aug 8 10:13:54 2016
New Revision: 239239
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239239&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from 2016-07-29 trunk r238863.
PR rtl-optimizat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71151
--- Comment #17 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
What about the performance issue re. crossing the jump table with a branch?
An easy fix would be to emit ".subsection 1" before the jump table; you think
we should do this?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72828
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71042
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||adhemerval.zanella at linaro
dot o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72771
--- Comment #7 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Mon Aug 8 12:05:11 2016
New Revision: 239240
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239240&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[RS6000] TOC refs generated during reload
The generic reload fix for pr7277
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72781
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72833
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72834
Bug ID: 72834
Summary: [5/6/7 Regression] the gij interpreter seems to be
broken on linux 64bit big endian targets
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72834
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
Looks ok here:
https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/openSUSE:Factory:PowerPC/pdftk/standard/ppc64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72833
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot
de
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72834
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab ---
And here:
https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/openSUSE:Factory:zSystems/pdftk/standard/s390x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72835
Bug ID: 72835
Summary: [Regression 7] Incorrect arithmetic optimization
involving bitfield arguments
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72836
Bug ID: 72836
Summary: global variable read clashes with reading from cin
with sync_stdio(false)
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71937
--- Comment #15 from Jean-Michel Dubois ---
I am back. I built gcc 6.1 with the --enable-decimal-float I need. I can now
compile successfully in about 2'30 with gcc -O2.
Thanks for your help.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72716
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72821
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Aug 8 13:58:46 2016
New Revision: 239241
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239241&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/72821
* lra-spills.c (regno_in_use_p):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58306
--- Comment #18 from Martin Liška ---
Ok, problem is that various value profilers are not updated atomically, fixed
in:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-08/msg00600.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67097
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEW
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72817
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
Summary|wrong code at -O3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72837
Bug ID: 72837
Summary: -Wundef is not being ignored with pragma
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67097
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Gilles Gouaillardet from comment #6)
> as a side note, would you be interested in me providing a patch so
> gcov-tool merge
> can merge n directories (currently, we are limited to n=2) ?
>
> i wo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72817
amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |amker at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58306
--- Comment #19 from Artem S. Tashkinov ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #18)
> Ok, problem is that various value profilers are not updated atomically,
> fixed in:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-08/msg00600.html
Thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58306
--- Comment #20 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Artem S. Tashkinov from comment #19)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #18)
> > Ok, problem is that various value profilers are not updated atomically,
> > fixed in:
> > https://gcc.gnu.or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58706
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72838
Bug ID: 72838
Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-cast.C
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72838
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
Note, the same error happens in:
PASS->NA: g++.dg/warn/overflow-warn-3.C -std=gnu++11 const (test for errors,
line 67)
PASS->FAIL: g++.dg/warn/overflow-warn-3.C -std=gnu++11 (test for excess
errors)
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72802
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|amodra at gmail dot com|
--- Comment #7 from Alan Modra ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72833
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #2 from Bernd Edlinger ---
[...]
> I see we had previously a solaris_longjmp_noreturn
> fixinclude rule, maybe that would be a starting point.
Certainly: up to Solaris 9,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72833
--- Comment #4 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 39076
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39076&action=edit
Mac OS X 10.7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72838
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72839
Bug ID: 72839
Summary: MOVE_RATIO is too small for Lakemont
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72838
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Mon Aug 8 15:32:16 2016
New Revision: 239242
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239242&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/72838 - FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-cast.C
gcc/testsuite/Ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72838
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46266
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71976
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72840
Bug ID: 72840
Summary: PASS->NA: 20_util/ratio/cons/cons_overflow_neg.cc
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72841
Bug ID: 72841
Summary: PASS->NA: 20_util/tuple/cons/66338.cc execution test
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71083
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #39068|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58306
--- Comment #21 from Artem S. Tashkinov ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #20)
> > Do I understand the patch correctly that it requires
> > "-fprofile-update=atomic" option in order to eliminate this bug?
>
> Exactly, I hope I'll be abl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72833
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
>> Could you please attach a faulty setjmp.h and a good setjmp.h
>
> I'm attaching the Mac OS X 10.7 one (i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72833
--- Comment #6 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Created attachment 39078
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39078&action=edit
untested patch
Completely untested patch.
Based on the gcc-4.9 solaris patch:
just s/solaris/darwin/
and s/__
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58306
--- Comment #22 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Artem S. Tashkinov from comment #21)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #20)
> > > Do I understand the patch correctly that it requires
> > > "-fprofile-update=atomic" option in order to el
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58306
--- Comment #23 from Artem S. Tashkinov ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #22)
> Sure, as Nathan suggested, we'll select the proper default value according
> to -pthread argument.
Wonderful! What are the chances of this patch being merg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72828
--- Comment #2 from Giuseppe Ottaviano ---
Martin, I noticed you marked this as "[5/6/7 Regression]", but to be clear the
bug is present since at least 4.9 (the oldest version I tested).
It's only the attached reduction that is sensitive to compi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71042
--- Comment #7 from Adhemerval Zanella
---
I do have a better solution to fix it, since for aarch64 glibc port, the stack
guard is a global variable (different than x86_64 where it in tcbhead
accessible through thread pointer).
We can just disa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72814
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71042
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72833
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #39078|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72842
Bug ID: 72842
Summary: non-type template-parameter of type void
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68703
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68703
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Not really sure if this is about dependent type or not, because the following
fails too:
template
struct D {
V v;
int f1 () { return this->v[N-1]; }
int f2 () { return v[N-1]; }
};
int
main ()
{
typ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72843
Bug ID: 72843
Summary: [7 Regression] internal compiler error: in
lra_set_insn_recog_data, at lra.c:964
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72842
--- Comment #1 from Daniel Krügler ---
I don't see anything wrong with that code, since the parameter pack is empty,
so there is never any attempt to declare void as non-type template parameter
type. The standard has this restriction only for a n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72833
--- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #6 from Bernd Edlinger ---
[...]
> Completely untested patch.
>
> Based on the gcc-4.9 solaris patch:
> just s/solaris/darwin/
> and s/__NORETURN/__dead2/
>
>
> Could you t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72843
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72843
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 39080
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39080&action=edit
A testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72844
Bug ID: 72844
Summary: Revision 293175 breaks gcc on FreeBSD
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72843
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from H
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72833
--- Comment #9 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #8)
> > --- Comment #6 from Bernd Edlinger ---
> [...]
> > Completely untested patch.
> >
> > Based on the gcc-4.9 solaris patch:
> > just s/solaris/d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72844
--- Comment #1 from Steve Kargl ---
On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 06:30:17PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72844
>
> Bug ID: 72844
>Summary: Revision 293175 breaks gcc on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72833
--- Comment #10 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #9 from Bernd Edlinger ---
>> In progress. Two comments:
>>
>> * Why the fixincl.tpl change? Is this necessary with upstream autogen
>> or only due to some Ubuntu-loc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71042
--- Comment #9 from Adhemerval Zanella
---
Right, I wasn't aware of this RPM symbol handling. I see that guard pointer
can be obtained on aarch64 by:
uintptr_t get_guard_ptr (void)
{
jmp_buf jb;
uintptr_t expected, mangled;
setjmp (jb)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72842
--- Comment #2 from Barry Revzin ---
This non-dependent version:
template void bar() { }
fails to compile, even if we never call bar(), even if we wanted to call it
with an empty pack.
foo in the original example is this same thing with an ex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72844
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72844
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Created attachment 39081
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39081&action=edit
Ensure that HAVE_ICONV is usable as a conditional
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72844
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #3)
> Created attachment 39081 [details]
> Ensure that HAVE_ICONV is usable as a conditional
Steve: this fixes the problem for me on a Linux box with iconv hacked out.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72833
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #39079|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72821
Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72833
--- Comment #12 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #10)
> True: the Solaris fix missed this, probably because the issue never came
> up. The Mac OS X 10.8+ has the annotation, so it's probably
> bes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72842
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler ---
Since this is not a newsgroup, let me ask differently: Can you please elaborate
what you consider as a concrete compiler defect, violating the existing
standard? I fail to see the point.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53431
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||TrevorJamesHickey at gmail dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72837
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
