https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71903
--- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson ---
Can you add a standalone (compilable and runnable) test case?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71909
Bug ID: 71909
Summary: g++ accepts an unreachable function catch block that
lacks a corresponding try
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71904
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71904
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
For an inline function like your example there's no warning unless the function
is used. If it's used, or not inline, it always warns.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71909
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71910
Bug ID: 71910
Summary: ICE on invalid OpenMP code
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71903
--- Comment #2 from Carlos Rafael ---
(In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #1)
> Can you add a standalone (compilable and runnable) test case?
I beg your pardon, Mikael. It was my bad! After submitting the bug here, I
could still did not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71911
Bug ID: 71911
Summary: [Cygwin] "gnatclean program" will remove the standard
package .ali file
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71903
--- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson ---
No worries. As the reporter you should be able to resolve it as "invalid".
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71912
Bug ID: 71912
Summary: flexible array in union
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: una
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71912
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71913
Bug ID: 71913
Summary: [5/6/7 Regression] Missing RVO for operator new
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization, wrong-code
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71913
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.9.3
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71903
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71908
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70559
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44265
--- Comment #16 from Paul Thomas ---
Created attachment 38917
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38917&action=edit
Further development of the patch
This patch cures the problem described at the end of comment #1. The change in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71493
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Is there a testcase? I cannot reproduce the problem. powerpc-elf-gcc
on both trunk and gcc-6-branch returns a struct in registers if it needs
at most two registers for that, in float regs if it needs j
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71523
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Jul 17 20:13:41 2016
New Revision: 238420
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238420&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-07-17 Fritz Reese
PR fortran/71523
* trans-de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71493
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71811
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71812
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 71811 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71523
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66816
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66795
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60470
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71898
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71901
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71901
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 38918
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38918&action=edit
Reduced test-case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71914
Bug ID: 71914
Summary: Name 'DOMAIN' is blocked when including math.h
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: c
30 matches
Mail list logo
