https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70606
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71832
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70606
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71832
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71834
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Status|UNCONF
-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160711 (experimental) [trunk revision 238202] (GCC)
$
$ clang++-3.8 -c -std=c++14 small.cpp
$
$ g++-trunk -c -std=c++14 small.cpp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71835
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71830
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71837
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71820
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70600
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70600
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> Note I think FRE handles the above incorrectly as it converts the safe
> unsigned addition to non safe signed addition. I will file a different bug
> about that i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70541
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71817
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70591
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71817
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71817
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon Jul 11 07:41:11 2016
New Revision: 238204
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238204&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ada/71817
* adaint.c (__gnat_is_read_accessible_fil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71817
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71831
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59833
--- Comment #6 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to Aurelien Jarno from comment #5)
> (In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #4)
> > Need to apply Aurelien's patch - looks like that's slipped through the
> > cracks.
>
> What was mi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71820
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71821
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71822
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71838
Bug ID: 71838
Summary: ICE with OpenCoarrays on submodule
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71822
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71823
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71823
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Started with r223574.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71758
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69880
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71823
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 38869
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38869&action=edit
gcc7-pr71823.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71834
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.9.3
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71759
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Confirmed on current trunk.
I also see the same ICE with gcc version 4.9.0 20140411 (experimental) r209304,
5.0.0 20150219 (experimental) r220825, and 6.0.0 20160415 (experimental)
r235027. I don't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71816
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71816
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
Btw, preprocessed source for the bootstrap issue is still appreciated (plus
mentioning the exact target triplet so I can verify with a cross).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70794
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71826
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71816
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 38870
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38870&action=edit
untested patch
I am testing this patch, it was a bit optimistic to simply replace refs I
guess.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71826
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71827
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71838
--- Comment #1 from Anton Shterenlikht ---
with OpenCoarrays-1.6.0 I just get:
caf -c -Wall -g -fbacktrace -fcheck-array-temporaries m3clvg_sm3.f90
'
(null):0: confused by earlier errors, bailing out
make: *** [m3clvg_sm3.o] Error 1
But there
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71838
--- Comment #2 from Anton Shterenlikht ---
forgot to add that this is now with gcc-6.1:
$ caf --version
OpenCoarrays Coarray Fortran Compiler Wrapper (caf version 1.6.0)
Copyright (C) 2015-2016 Sourcery, Inc.
$ mpif90 --version
GNU Fortran (GC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71839
Bug ID: 71839
Summary: undefined reference to `_gfortran_caf_stop_str'
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71823
--- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> b[i] = __builtin_fma (0.0f, 0.0f, a[i]);
I am surprised we don't optimize that line, at least with -fno-signed-zeros. If
the testcase still works with less tri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71840
Bug ID: 71840
Summary: [7 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation
fault in compute_avail
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71828
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71840
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek ---
I think this started with
commit e1bba98001be7ab89d5734ae0fdfe3996b4281a7
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jul 7 07:43:35 2016 +
2016-07-07 Richard Biener
* tree-ssa-pre.c: Include alias.h.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71816
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot
de
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71823
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #5)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> > b[i] = __builtin_fma (0.0f, 0.0f, a[i]);
>
> I am surprised we don't optimize that line, at least with -fno-sig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71832
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71838
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71833
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71839
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71565
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71834
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71835
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71841
Bug ID: 71841
Summary: variadic template can't cast to base class
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71842
Bug ID: 71842
Summary: Optimize FMA when some arguments are simple constants
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhance
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71816
--- Comment #16 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The following is reduced from the genattrtab.c ICE when bootstrapping on
arm-none-linux-gnueabihf:
typedef struct rtx_def *rtx;
union rtunion {
int rt_int;
rtx rt_rtx;
};
struct rtx_def {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71835
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71837
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69526
--- Comment #25 from rdapp at linux dot vnet.ibm.com ---
Created attachment 38875
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38875&action=edit
Updated patch and test, math.pd/VRP
Some cleanups and fixes, the patch can now handle more ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71843
Bug ID: 71843
Summary: [concepts] Diagnostics issued for constraint
satisfaction failure fail to elucidate unsatisfied
constraints
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71816
--- Comment #17 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jul 11 13:32:51 2016
New Revision: 238208
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238208&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-07-11 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/71816
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71838
--- Comment #4 from Anton Shterenlikht ---
Yes, it's a library:
https://sourceforge.net/p/cgpack/code/HEAD/tree/head/
I'll try to reduce the problem case to something smaller.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71839
--- Comment #2 from Anton Shterenlikht ---
https://sourceforge.net/p/cgpack/code/HEAD/tree/head/tests/testAAF.f90
One would need to build the library first:
https://sourceforge.net/p/cgpack/code/HEAD/tree/head/
I'll try to reduce the problem c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71843
--- Comment #1 from Tom Honermann ---
Created attachment 38876
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38876&action=edit
Patch to elucidate failed constraints
The attached patch was provided to me by Andrew Sutton earlier this year
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71784
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71774
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71732
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Well, instead of if (RTL_CONST_OR_PURE_CALL_P (insn)) you should certainly use
else instead. If you invalidate all memory already, there is no point to
invalidate the arguments, e.g. for looping const/pure f
4-pc-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
--enable-offload-targets=x86_64-intelmicemul-linux-gnu --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160711 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71823
--- Comment #7 from Nicolas Stinus ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> Confirmed, it's ICE since GCC 6.1.x.
I am not sure it is only ICE-on-invalid-code.
In my initial source, it crashed on fma(b[i], b[i], a[i]).
Thanks anyway for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71732
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #7 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71841
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71816
--- Comment #18 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
> Created attachment 38870
> --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38870&action=edit
> untested patch
>
> I am testing this patc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71784
--- Comment #12 from Ela ---
Example:
When an usual member function is missing (say template class
instantiated with extern), the compiler (4.9.3, 6.1) will complain
in_clear about the missing function.
When a ref-qual'ed one is missing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71801
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Mon Jul 11 15:13:56 2016
New Revision: 238211
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238211&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Don't convert TImode in debug insn
When converting V1TImode regist
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71801
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71838
--- Comment #5 from Anton Shterenlikht ---
I reduced the case to 8 Fortran files:
http://eis.bris.ac.uk/~mexas/0.txz
Untar the file
cd zproblem
make
caf -c -Wall -g -fbacktrace -fcheck-array-temporaries cgca_m1co.f90
caf -c -Wall -g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71518
--- Comment #4 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Mon Jul 11 15:21:20 2016
New Revision: 238212
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238212&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-07-11 Yuri Rumyantsev
Backport from mainline r238055.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71838
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62125
--- Comment #5 from mrestelli ---
I think the following patch could solve the problem:
Index: gcc/fortran/symbol.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/symbol.c(revision 238083)
+++ gcc/for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69880
--- Comment #3 from Boris Kolpackov ---
Ok, I've added support for embedding custom manifests in build2. The resulting
.exe's work as expected: custom manifest is used instead of (or in addition to)
the default one. However, with grep I can still
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71758
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71830
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71816
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71816
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||helloqirun at gmail dot com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71756
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69880
--- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton ---
(In reply to Boris Kolpackov from comment #3)
> I see this is not the latest generally, but it is the latest available from
> the MSYS2 repositories. The last commit here says 2.26 is still no usable:
It is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71756
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
In
if (!cp_parser_error_occurred (parser)
&& cp_lexer_next_token_is (parser->lexer, CPP_OPEN_BRACE)
&& cp_parser_start_tentative_firewall (parser))
start = token;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71736
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59832
gcc-bugzilla at zulan dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc-bugzilla at zulan dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71173
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69880
--- Comment #5 from vsz.bugzilla at emailuser dot net ---
You may find a self-contained example under the GitHub link included in the
original report. Direct link:
https://github.com/Alexpux/MSYS2-packages/issues/454#issuecomment-186433276
(This
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71173
--- Comment #6 from gcc-bugzilla at zulan dot net ---
As far as I can tell it is fixed. Tested with Archlinux "6.1.1" which seems to
be git/1bbd3999).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71844
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71844
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Monakov ---
Jakub, this code is taken verbatim from the openmp-examples document. Should we
report it at their github issue tracker? The example in their public git has
always been without the A[0:4] map on 'omp targ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70869
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60172
Thomas Preud'homme changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71840
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71839
--- Comment #3 from Anton Shterenlikht ---
In the end I reduced the program to:
use cgca
if (.true.) stop
end
The problem seems to appear if I move the
static library from where it was built to another location.
E.g if I build my library, and
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
