[Bug target/71460] Copying structs can trap (on x86-32) due to SNaN to QNaN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71460 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug tree-optimization/71462] [7 Regression] gcc ICE at -O3 on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu with “seg fault”

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71462 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0 Summary|[7 Regressiongcc

[Bug c++/71456] missing -Wunused-variable on a static global initialized with another

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71456 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic, |

[Bug tree-optimization/71461] missed optimization in conditional assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71461 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status|

[Bug tree-optimization/71462] [7 Regression] gcc ICE at -O3 on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu with “seg fault”

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71462 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/71464] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid C++11 code (with redeclared constructor) at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71464 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery, |

[Bug c++/71465] [7 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code (with duplicate base) on x86_64-linux-gnu: in dfs_build_secondary_vptr_vtt_inits, at cp/class.c:9075

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71465 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery, |

[Bug target/71460] Copying structs can trap (on x86-32) due to SNaN to QNaN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71460 --- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > It looks like RTL expansion uses DFmode to copy the aggregate which is likely > because the backend (or stor-layout.c) assigns DFmode to struct s. A similar > iss

[Bug tree-optimization/71407] [7 Regression] ICE at -O3 in 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (verify_gimple: integral result type precision does not match field size of BIT_FIELD_REF)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71407 Qirun Zhang changed: What|Removed |Added CC||helloqirun at gmail dot com --- Comment #4

[Bug middle-end/71310] Bitfields cause load hit store with smaller store and larger load

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71310 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |middle-end --- Comment #5 from Richard

[Bug middle-end/71310] Bitfields cause load hit store with smaller store and larger load

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71310 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/71466] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71466 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c/71455] On files with many functions, gcc 4.8.3 is much slower than v4.4.5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71455 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/71462] [7 Regression] gcc ICE at -O3 on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu with “seg fault”

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71462 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- #4 0x01035c30 in find_uses_to_rename (changed_bbs=0x26e1748, use_blocks=0x281d750, need_phis=0x2792450, use_flags=1) at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:476 476

[Bug target/71460] Copying structs can trap (on x86-32) due to SNaN to QNaN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71460 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 fr

[Bug target/71467] New: extra store for -mavx -mno-avx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71467 Bug ID: 71467 Summary: extra store for -mavx -mno-avx Product: gcc Version: 5.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization, ssemmx Severity: minor Prio

[Bug target/71467] extra store for -mavx -mno-avx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71467 --- Comment #1 from Micha³ Miros³aw --- It gets even worse with AVX also disabled. $ gcc -O3 -mno-avx -mno-avx2 -S -o - a.c

[Bug target/71467] extraneous stores emitted for __v8si with -mno-avx2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71467 --- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse --- DUP of PR55266? (there are probably other related PRs)

[Bug target/71460] Copying structs can trap (on x86-32) due to SNaN to QNaN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71460 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/71465] [7 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code (with duplicate base) on x86_64-linux-gnu: in dfs_build_secondary_vptr_vtt_inits, at cp/class.c:9075

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71465 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/71464] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid C++11 code (with redeclared constructor) at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71464 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/71460] Copying structs can trap (on x86-32) due to SNaN to QNaN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71460 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6) > (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #5) > > Following patch fixes the failure: > > > > --cut here-- > > diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386

[Bug c++/71458] ICE with -fsanitize=bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71458 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/71467] extraneous stores emitted for __v8si with -mno-avx2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71467 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/65832] Inefficient vector construction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65832 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mirq-gccboogs at rere dot qmqm.pl ---

[Bug middle-end/65832] Inefficient vector construction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65832 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/71458] ICE with -fsanitize=bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71458 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Minimal test-case: enum {} a[0]; void fn1(int); void fn2() { fn1(a[-1]); } Minimal command line arguments: g++ pr.ii -fsanitize=bounds -fcheck-pointer-bounds -mmpx I've got a patch that fixes that, will se

[Bug sanitizer/71458] ICE with -fsanitize=bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71458 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- The PR is very similar to PR65044, I'm going to prepare a very similar patch for -fsanitize=bounds.

[Bug c/71455] On files with many functions, gcc 4.8.3 is much slower than v4.4.5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71455 --- Comment #2 from Avi Bloch --- Any ideas how I can workaround this problem?

[Bug c++/71463] "ignoring attributes on template argument" in -O1 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71463 --- Comment #2 from Milian Wolff --- Indeed, there is a difference between malloc in the two levels: -O0: extern void *malloc (size_t __size) throw () __attribute__ ((__malloc__)) ; -O1: extern void *mallo

[Bug sanitizer/71445] libsanitizer build failure on aarch64-linux-gnu with recent glibc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71445 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- True; on the other side, at least for backports we need some other solution, because the symbol versioning stuff can't be backported to GCC 6.2 or 5.5 and people will surely want to be able to compile those

[Bug c/71455] On files with many functions, gcc 4.8.3 is much slower than v4.4.5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71455 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- I think the patches for the performance issue were not too invasive so backporting them should be possible. You can identify them by searching bugzilla for "expand" slowness or by bisecting SVN revisions to

[Bug c++/71468] New: explicit ctor and overload resolution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71468 Bug ID: 71468 Summary: explicit ctor and overload resolution Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/71386] Wrong code on c++14 (GCC trunk)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71386 --- Comment #1 from Anton Mitrokhin --- Could anyone please take a look?

[Bug c/71455] On files with many functions, gcc 4.8.3 is much slower than v4.4.5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71455 --- Comment #4 from Avi Bloch --- Unfortunately re-compiling gcc or moving to a different version is not an option. What I'm looking for are flags to pass to gcc that will alleviate the problem. My problem seems similar to this one: https://gc

[Bug c++/71469] New: Print possible override candidates when a method is marked override but doesn't override

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71469 Bug ID: 71469 Summary: Print possible override candidates when a method is marked override but doesn't override Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Se

[Bug target/71470] New: Wrong code on trunk gcc with westmere target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71470 Bug ID: 71470 Summary: Wrong code on trunk gcc with westmere target Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug c/65471] type interpretation in _Generic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65471 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Thu Jun 9 10:16:19 2016 New Revision: 237252 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237252&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/65471 * gcc.dg/c11-generic-3.c: New test. Added:

[Bug c/65471] type interpretation in _Generic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65471 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/71338] [RL78] mulu instruction not used on G10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71338 --- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo --- ping ... anybody?

[Bug tree-optimization/71466] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71466 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug tree-optimization/71466] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71466 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- The problem is caused by loop unroller: 144t.ivcanon looks good: fn1 () { _Bool c_lsm.12; int c_lsm.11; _Bool d_lsm.10; int d_lsm.9; int f; int e; int _5; int c.3_9; int _13; int c.3_21;

[Bug tree-optimization/71466] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71466 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/71465] [7 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code (with duplicate base) on x86_64-linux-gnu: in dfs_build_secondary_vptr_vtt_inits, at cp/class.c:9075

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71465 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug tree-optimization/71407] [7 Regression] ICE at -O3 in 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (verify_gimple: integral result type precision does not match field size of BIT_FIELD_REF)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71407 --- Comment #5 from alahay01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Qirun Zhang : That's a different issue (original test fails due to data type mismatch, this test fails because the loop boundary is unset). Please could you raise your test as a new bug and ass

[Bug target/71460] Copying structs can trap (on x86-32) due to SNaN to QNaN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71460 --- Comment #8 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- It's not correct to use flag_signaling_nans for a fix. flag_signaling_nans is only for cases where a bit-pattern for a signaling NaN is interpreted as a floating-point value. It's not whe

[Bug tree-optimization/71466] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71466 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- Started with r236831: Author: law Date: Fri May 27 16:32:38 2016 + * tree-ssa-threadedge.c: Remove include of tree-ssa-threadbackward.h. (thread_across_edge): Remove calls to find_jump

[Bug tree-optimization/71466] [7 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71466 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/71456] missing -Wunused-variable on a static global initialized with another

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71456 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/71462] [7 Regression] gcc ICE at -O3 on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu with “seg fault”

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71462 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Jun 9 11:36:22 2016 New Revision: 237254 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237254&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-06-09 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/71462

[Bug target/71460] Copying structs can trap (on x86-32) due to SNaN to QNaN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71460 --- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #8) > It's not correct to use flag_signaling_nans for a fix. > flag_signaling_nans is only for cases where a bit-pattern for a signaling > NaN is interpreted

[Bug tree-optimization/68961] [6 regression] Test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr60203.c fails since r231674

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68961 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- Note that the fix depends on "bogus" cost for the vector construction on x86_64. Currently it is two stmts (nunits / 2 + 1) but the vector can be constructed by a single unpcklpd stmt. The correct cost is

[Bug tree-optimization/71462] [7 Regression] gcc ICE at -O3 on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu with “seg fault”

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71462 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/71465] [7 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code (with duplicate base) on x86_64-linux-gnu: in dfs_build_secondary_vptr_vtt_inits, at cp/class.c:9075

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71465 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Thu Jun 9 12:02:17 2016 New Revision: 237258 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237258&root=gcc&view=rev Log: /cp 2016-06-09 Paolo Carlini PR c++/71465 R

[Bug c++/70202] ICE on invalid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in build_simple_base_path, at cp/class.c:579

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70202 --- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Thu Jun 9 12:02:17 2016 New Revision: 237258 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237258&root=gcc&view=rev Log: /cp 2016-06-09 Paolo Carlini PR c++/71465 R

[Bug c++/71465] [7 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code (with duplicate base) on x86_64-linux-gnu: in dfs_build_secondary_vptr_vtt_inits, at cp/class.c:9075

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71465 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/70202] ICE on invalid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in build_simple_base_path, at cp/class.c:579

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70202 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug bootstrap/71471] New: [7 Regression] Selftest failure in pretty-print.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71471 Bug ID: 71471 Summary: [7 Regression] Selftest failure in pretty-print.c Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: b

[Bug bootstrap/71471] [7 Regression] Selftest failure in pretty-print.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71471 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/71471] [7 Regression] Selftest failure in pretty-print.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71471 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug c++/71472] New: Wlogical-op misses exhaustive-or case (... || A) || B

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71472 Bug ID: 71472 Summary: Wlogical-op misses exhaustive-or case (... || A) || B Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug bootstrap/71471] [7 Regression] Selftest failure in pretty-print.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71471 --- Comment #2 from David Malcolm --- Which target? (and host?) FWIW before I committed it I successfully tested building gcc stage1 with the patch using contrib/config-list.mk, with build=host=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with target= everything other

[Bug sanitizer/71445] libsanitizer build failure on aarch64-linux-gnu with recent glibc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71445 --- Comment #12 from Adhemerval Zanella --- After checking the work required for enable symbol versioning wrapper on libsanitizer I am more inclined to go with always ignore the high bits (at least for backports). The versioning enablement will

[Bug bootstrap/71471] [7 Regression] Selftest failure in pretty-print.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71471 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c/65446] Improve -Wformat-signedness

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65446 Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rnsanchez at gmail dot com --

[Bug c/71473] New: cilkplus sum reducer ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71473 Bug ID: 71473 Summary: cilkplus sum reducer ICE Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unas

[Bug c/71473] cilkplus sum reducer ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71473 --- Comment #1 from tprince at computer dot org --- Created attachment 38668 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38668&action=edit cilkplus C source (before preprocessing)

[Bug middle-end/71474] New: PRED_LOOP_IV_COMPARE wrongly calculates number of iterations of a loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71474 Bug ID: 71474 Summary: PRED_LOOP_IV_COMPARE wrongly calculates number of iterations of a loop Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/71473] cilkplus sum reducer ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71473 --- Comment #2 from tprince at computer dot org --- Created attachment 38669 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38669&action=edit C include file

[Bug middle-end/71474] PRED_LOOP_IV_COMPARE wrongly calculates number of iterations of a loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71474 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 38670 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38670&action=edit Candidate patch Following patch uses loop upper_bound to make the # of iterations properly estimated.

[Bug c/71475] New: Optimization of copying into long double looses bytes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71475 Bug ID: 71475 Summary: Optimization of copying into long double looses bytes Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug target/71009] g++: ICE on modified gdb/valarith.c with -Ofast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71009 --- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager --- Still happens with: $ /usr/local/bin/g++ -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=/usr/local/bin/g++ COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/libexec/gcc/i386-apple-darwin9.8.0/7.0.0/lto-wrapper Target: i386-apple-darwin9

[Bug target/58416] Incorrect x87-based union copying code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58416 Alexander Cherepanov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ch3root at openwall dot com --- C

[Bug fortran/71203] ICE in add_init_expr_to_sym, at fortran/decl.c:1512 and :1564

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71203 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/71357] [7 Regression] [graphite] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block follows the use for SSA_NAME) w/ -O2 -floop-nest-optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71357 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/71476] New: ICE in gimplify_switch_expr with -Wswitch-unreachable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71476 Bug ID: 71476 Summary: ICE in gimplify_switch_expr with -Wswitch-unreachable Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug middle-end/71476] ICE in gimplify_switch_expr with -Wswitch-unreachable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71476 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery, |

[Bug bootstrap/71471] [7 Regression] Selftest failure in pretty-print.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71471 --- Comment #4 from David Malcolm --- Reproduced on gcc111 (powerpc-ibm-aix7.1.3.0) (gdb) bt #0 _Z11fancy_abortPKciS0_ (file=0x12557bbc "../../src/gcc/selftest.c", line=44, function=0x12557be0 "fail") at ../../src/gcc/diagnostic.c:1281 #

[Bug bootstrap/71471] [7 Regression] Selftest failure in pretty-print.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71471 --- Comment #5 from David Edelsohn --- ah, no, it must be the %p one and that is indeed arch specific I think c99 says: The value of the pointer is converted to a sequence of printing characters, in an implementation-defined manner.

[Bug sanitizer/71445] libsanitizer build failure on aarch64-linux-gnu with recent glibc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71445 Carlos O'Donell changed: What|Removed |Added CC||carlos at redhat dot com --- Comment #

[Bug bootstrap/71471] [7 Regression] Selftest failure in pretty-print.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71471 --- Comment #6 from David Malcolm --- Thanks. Sorry about the breakage. Candidate patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg00703.html

[Bug tree-optimization/71477] New: gcc ICE at -O3 on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu with “seg fault”

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71477 Bug ID: 71477 Summary: gcc ICE at -O3 on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu with “seg fault” Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/71407] [7 Regression] ICE at -O3 in 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (verify_gimple: integral result type precision does not match field size of BIT_FIELD_REF)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71407 --- Comment #6 from Qirun Zhang --- (In reply to alahay01 from comment #5) > Qirun Zhang : > > That's a different issue (original test fails due to data type mismatch, > this test fails because the loop boundary is unset). > > Please could you

[Bug c++/71456] missing -Wunused-variable on a static global initialized with another

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71456 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #2) > Speaking of -Wglobal-constructors, FSF GCC doesn't support this option. Is > there a bug open for adding it? I couldn't find one when searching. I couldn't find i

[Bug tree-optimization/52171] memcmp/strcmp/strncmp can be optimized when the result is tested for [in]equality with 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52171 Bug 52171 depends on bug 71413, which changed state. Bug 71413 Summary: [7 Regression] bootstrap (gnat) broken on arm-linux-gnueabi* https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71413 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug ada/71413] [7 Regression] bootstrap (gnat) broken on arm-linux-gnueabi*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71413 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/71432] [7 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71432 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/71478] New: ICE in tree-ssa-reassoc.c after r236564

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71478 Bug ID: 71478 Summary: ICE in tree-ssa-reassoc.c after r236564 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimi

[Bug c/70883] inconsistent error message for calls to __builtin_add_overflow with too few arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70883 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Thu Jun 9 16:32:25 2016 New Revision: 237268 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237268&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/70883 - inconsistent error message for calls to __builtin_add_overflo

[Bug c/70883] inconsistent error message for calls to __builtin_add_overflow with too few arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70883 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/71478] [7 Regression] ICE in tree-ssa-reassoc.c after r236564

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71478 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug target/71460] Copying structs can trap (on x86-32) due to SNaN to QNaN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71460 --- Comment #10 from Alexander Cherepanov --- On 2016-06-08 20:47, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- > I think this is really a dup of bug 57484. The problem is x87 related and > there is not much to be d

[Bug target/71460] Copying structs can trap (on x86-32) due to SNaN to QNaN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71460 --- Comment #11 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Thu, 9 Jun 2016, ch3root at openwall dot com wrote: > - mere load (e.g. from a volatile var) of a float or double sNaN traps > on x86-32 when traps are enabled; It raises an exception.

[Bug target/71460] Copying structs can trap (on x86-32) due to SNaN to QNaN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71460 --- Comment #12 from Alexander Cherepanov --- On 2016-06-09 11:22, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Would be nice to have a testcase for the SRA case as well. Source code: -

[Bug c/65446] Improve -Wformat-signedness

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65446 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/71471] [7 Regression] Selftest failure in pretty-print.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71471 --- Comment #7 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Thu Jun 9 17:27:12 2016 New Revision: 237271 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237271&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR bootstrap/71471: remove selftest for pp_format (%p) gcc/ChangeLog:

[Bug bootstrap/71471] [7 Regression] Selftest failure in pretty-print.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71471 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/71472] Wlogical-op misses exhaustive-or case (... || A) || B

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71472 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCO

[Bug c++/71469] Print possible override candidates when a method is marked override but doesn't override

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71469 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic, easyhack S

[Bug c/71479] New: error on __builtin_add_overflow with bool or enum pointer as last argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71479 Bug ID: 71479 Summary: error on __builtin_add_overflow with bool or enum pointer as last argument Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

  1   2   >