https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71407
Chengnian Sun changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chengniansun at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71408
Bug ID: 71408
Summary: wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70202
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sat Jun 4 07:10:58 2016
New Revision: 237089
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237089&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2016-06-04 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/70202
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70202
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60272
Max Wittal changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||max.wittal at mwittal dot de
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60272
--- Comment #9 from Max Wittal ---
I still get this bug in gcc version 5.2.1 20151010 on x86_64-linux-gnu.
Please see attached code.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71403
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71409
Bug ID: 71409
Summary: darwin Comparing stages 2 and 3 slight failure
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57466
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I agree that G++ seems to be correct according to the revised direction.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66947
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71410
Bug ID: 71410
Summary: ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu:
Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71408
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
(Separately from the wrong code) some of the reads of c.f1 are represented as
BIT_FIELD_REF & 262143, which prevents us from optimizing it to a
constant (others that are represented as c.f1 work just fine) :-(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71208
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71405
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71405
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71406
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71408
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52171
--- Comment #11 from Oleg Endo ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Sat Jun 4 11:00:58 2016
New Revision: 237090
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237090&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog
PR tree-optimization/52171
* config/sh/sh.c
&& ./a.out
c = 1
a[0][c] = 5
a[0][1] = 7
--
gcc version: gcc (GCC) 7.0.0 20160604 (experimental)
For comparison:
--
$ clang -std=c11 -Weverything -O3 test.c && ./a.out
tes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71412
Bug ID: 71412
Summary: iso_c_bindings and optimization interaction bug
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71407
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71408
--- Comment #3 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Looking into it. Looks like zero_one_operation is still broken.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71405
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Jun 4 14:50:57 2016
New Revision: 237091
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237091&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/71405
* tree-ssa.c (execute_update_ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71412
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71412
--- Comment #2 from relliott at umn dot edu ---
> I believe gfortran's behavior conforms to the standard. F2003 states
>
> When the execution of a procedure is terminated by execution
> of a RETURN or END statement, an allocatable variable th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71412
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to relliott from comment #2)
> > I believe gfortran's behavior conforms to the standard. F2003 states
> >
> > When the execution of a procedure is terminated by execution
> > of a RET
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71412
--- Comment #4 from relliott at umn dot edu ---
> Ahem, give val the SAVE attribute.
>
> integer(c_int), pointer, save :: val
Hi, Thanks for your help. Unfortunately, I don't think using save will serve
my purpose in this case. Although, now
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71412
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl ---
On Sat, Jun 04, 2016 at 04:36:24PM +, relliott at umn dot edu wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71412
>
> --- Comment #4 from relliott at umn dot edu ---
> > Ahem, give val the SAVE att
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71412
--- Comment #6 from relliott at umn dot edu ---
> Have you considered the SAVE attribute?
>
> integer(c_int), pointer,save:: val
>
> laptop-kargl:kargl[246] gmake
> gfc -O3 -g -Wall -pedantic -c skeleton-f.F90
> ~/work/bin/gcc -O3 -g -Wall -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71413
Bug ID: 71413
Summary: [7 Regression] bootstrap (gnat) broken on
arm-linux-gnueabi*
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71414
Bug ID: 71414
Summary: 2x slower than clang summing small float array
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71286
Andris Pavenis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andris.pavenis at iki dot fi
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71415
Bug ID: 71415
Summary: std::filesystem::exists that does not throw sets error
code if file does not exist
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71364
--- Comment #3 from Ville Voutilainen ---
Which version of range-v3? I cloned https://github.com/ericniebler/range-v3.git
and its tests seem to pass on the current trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71404
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71404
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at linux dot
vnet.ibm.com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71401
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48116
--- Comment #11 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Sat Jun 4 20:50:50 2016
New Revision: 237093
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237093&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/48116 - -Wreturn-type does not work as advertised
gcc/ChangeLog:
20
-trunk/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160604 (experimental) [trunk revision 237091] (GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60335
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67872
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ch3root at openwall dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71411
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71402
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71394
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60272
--- Comment #10 from Max Wittal ---
Sorry, I'm pretty sure now that there is some hard to find bug in my code, like
the ABA problem.
Please disregard my comment above.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71402
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolut
model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160604 (experimental) [trunk revision 237091] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -O2 small.c; ./a.out
$ gcc-6.1 -O3 small.c; ./a.out
$
$ gcc-trunk -O3 small.c
$ ./a.out
Floating point exception (core dumped)
$
---
char a = -97;
int b, c, d, e
47 matches
Mail list logo
