https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70653
--- Comment #2 from waleed ---
can you recommend me which tool we should use for bug tracking
> From: gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
> To: waleed-ri...@hotmail.com
> Subject: [Bug c++/70653] bubble sorting algorithm fail to run on the compiler
> givi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70669
Bug ID: 70669
Summary: PowerPC __float128 does not support direct move
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70669
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64le-unknown-linux-g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70670
Bug ID: 70670
Summary: Duplicate code in rs6000_secondary_reload_direct_move
in rs6000.c
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70670
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64le-unknown-linux-g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646
--- Comment #13 from Josh Poimboeuf ---
So if I understand correctly, some reachable code is incorrectly getting marked
unreachable and then getting discarded.
Interestingly, the function's epilogue (frame pointer restore) and return
instruction
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70671
Bug ID: 70671
Summary: Wrong column number shown for "error: cannot take
address of bit-field"
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
--- Comment #49 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Apr 14 19:21:31 2016
New Revision: 234987
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234987&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70594
* ipa-utils.h (polymorphic_ctor_dtor_p): New
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70652
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70640
--- Comment #4 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Thu Apr 14 20:05:58 2016
New Revision: 234988
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234988&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-04-14 Michael Meissner
PR target/70640
* gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70640
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70543
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70622
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70543
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70648
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Apr 14 20:14:38 2016
New Revision: 234989
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234989&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70648
* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_store_expression): A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70543
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Apr 14 20:14:44 2016
New Revision: 234990
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234990&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70543
* pt.c (value_dependent_expression_p) [VAR_D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70622
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Apr 14 20:14:49 2016
New Revision: 234991
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234991&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70622
* parser.c (cp_parser_init_declarator): Add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70648
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70672
Bug ID: 70672
Summary: [5] Wrong code for little endian bitfield modification
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70672
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69517
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5 regression] SEGV on a|[5/6 regression] SEGV on a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70019
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16994
Bug 16994 depends on bug 70019, which changed state.
Bug 70019 Summary: VLA size overflow not detected
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70019
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70588
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16994
Bug 16994 depends on bug 70588, which changed state.
Bug 70588 Summary: SIGBUS on a VLA larger than SIZE_MAX / 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70588
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69517
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70528
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70652
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
Created attachment 38274
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38274&action=edit
Patch to replace C++ VLAs with alloca.
For future reference, the attached patch gets around the problem by repla
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70647
--- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
> --- Comment #2 from Matt Godbolt ---
> Thanks Manuel. Interestingly this does elicit a warning:
>
> struct B {
> int a; int b;
> B(B &&o)
> : a(static_cast(a)),
> b(std::move(o.b)) {}
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65083
Chris Quenelle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chris.quenelle at oracle dot
com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70647
--- Comment #4 from Matt Godbolt ---
Agreed re: cast/FE.
I couldn't quite get your example to fail as the "o" parameter is unusued
(which would be a good clue!
#include // for std::move
struct B {
int a; int b;
B(B &&o)
: a(b),
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61409
--- Comment #16 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
AFAICT tree-ssa-uninit won't look at the predicate associated with an undefined
PHI argument and test it against the predicate for the actual use.
ie, given this PHI from the testcase:
;; basic block 6,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70669
--- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner ---
Created attachment 38275
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38275&action=edit
Proposed patch to fix the problem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70672
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |segher at gcc dot
gnu.org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70360
ctice at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ctice at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70669
--- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner ---
Fixed in subversion id 234995.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70669
--- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Thu Apr 14 23:21:30 2016
New Revision: 234995
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234995&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2016-04-14 Michael Meissner
PR target/70669
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70669
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70673
Bug ID: 70673
Summary: ICE with module containing functions with allocatable
character scalars
Product: gcc
Version: fortran-dev
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70673
--- Comment #1 from David Kinniburgh ---
Ah, maybe I reduced this too far as a1 and a2 are obviously uninitialized, but
still...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68814
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool ---
*** Bug 70672 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70672
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68814
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70673
--- Comment #2 from David Kinniburgh ---
Ah, maybe I reduced this too far as a1 and a2 are obviously uninitialized...
Is this better - it also produces an ICE?
module m
contains
subroutine s(in)
character(*), intent(in) :: in
character(:), al
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68814
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66033
--- Comment #5 from Alan Modra ---
Comment #4 was added to the wrong bug. Not fixed on gcc-5 branch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70528
--- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Apr 15 02:23:05 2016
New Revision: 235002
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235002&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70528
* class.c (type_has_constexpr_default_const
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70528
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6 Regression] bogus |[5 Regression] bogus error:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70674
Bug ID: 70674
Summary: [4.9/5/6 regression] S/390: Memory access below stack
pointer in epilogue
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critica
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70674
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70494
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Apr 15 04:02:49 2016
New Revision: 235003
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235003&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70494
* decl.c (cxx_maybe_build_cleanup): Handle n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70494
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70650
--- Comment #18 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #17 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
[...]
> Just for the record, with your patch a sparc-sun-solaris2.12 bootstrap
> is well into stage2, so
101 - 154 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
