[Bug target/70630] [6 regression] sparc bootstrap failure: sparc.c:4919:6: error: suggest explicit braces to avoid ambiguous 'else'

2016-04-12 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70630 --- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Tue Apr 12 20:56:11 2016 New Revision: 234920 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234920&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-04-12 Eric Botcazou PR target/70630 * config/

[Bug target/70630] [6 regression] sparc bootstrap failure: sparc.c:4919:6: error: suggest explicit braces to avoid ambiguous 'else'

2016-04-12 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70630 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/70642] New: Invalid alias template instantiation not rejected if previously used in SFINAE context

2016-04-12 Thread rs2740 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70642 Bug ID: 70642 Summary: Invalid alias template instantiation not rejected if previously used in SFINAE context Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Seve

[Bug c++/70634] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)

2016-04-12 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70634 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug sanitizer/70624] [6 Regression] Several hundred asan failures with 6.0 on x86_64-apple-darwin10.8

2016-04-12 Thread howarth.at.gcc at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70624 --- Comment #6 from Jack Howarth --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > So can dyldVersionNumber be only used for #if SANITIZER_IOSSIM and otherwise > use what it did before? The IOSSIM code from llvm's sanitizer was never migrated in

[Bug sanitizer/70624] [6 Regression] Several hundred asan failures with 6.0 on x86_64-apple-darwin10.8

2016-04-12 Thread howarth.at.gcc at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70624 --- Comment #7 from Jack Howarth --- Also, note that upstream has in compiler-rt/cmake/config-ix.cmake... if(SANITIZER_MIN_OSX_VERSION VERSION_LESS "10.7") message(FATAL_ERROR "Too old OS X version: ${SANITIZER_MIN_OSX_VERSION}") e

[Bug middle-end/70643] New: broken openacc reduction inside a fortran module

2016-04-12 Thread cesar at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70643 Bug ID: 70643 Summary: broken openacc reduction inside a fortran module Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: openacc Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug c++/70641] [5/6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_gimple failed

2016-04-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70641 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-checking Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug target/70107] ICE: in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3546 with -mcpu=power8

2016-04-12 Thread amodra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70107 --- Comment #7 from Alan Modra --- Author: amodra Date: Tue Apr 12 22:58:36 2016 New Revision: 234924 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234924&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix target/70107, another case of PR c++/70096 gcc/cp/ PR target/70

[Bug c++/70096] [6 Regression] [Invalid codegen] Read of uninitialized value in ref-qualified pointer to member function

2016-04-12 Thread amodra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70096 --- Comment #8 from Alan Modra --- Author: amodra Date: Tue Apr 12 22:58:36 2016 New Revision: 234924 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234924&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix target/70107, another case of PR c++/70096 gcc/cp/ PR target/70

[Bug c++/70096] [6 Regression] [Invalid codegen] Read of uninitialized value in ref-qualified pointer to member function

2016-04-12 Thread amodra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70096 --- Comment #9 from Alan Modra --- Author: amodra Date: Tue Apr 12 22:59:05 2016 New Revision: 234925 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234925&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix target/70107, another case of PR c++/70096 gcc/cp/ PR target/70

[Bug target/70107] ICE: in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3546 with -mcpu=power8

2016-04-12 Thread amodra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70107 --- Comment #8 from Alan Modra --- Author: amodra Date: Tue Apr 12 22:59:05 2016 New Revision: 234925 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234925&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix target/70107, another case of PR c++/70096 gcc/cp/ PR target/70

[Bug target/70107] ICE: in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3546 with -mcpu=power8

2016-04-12 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70107 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/61839] More optimize opportunity for VRP

2016-04-12 Thread kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61839 kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/70610] [6 regression] error: invalid initialization of non-const reference of type

2016-04-12 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70610 --- Comment #7 from Patrick Palka --- Author: ppalka Date: Wed Apr 13 00:06:51 2016 New Revision: 234926 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234926&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix PR c++/70610 (wrong overload resolution during template processing)

[Bug c++/70610] [6 regression] error: invalid initialization of non-const reference of type

2016-04-12 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70610 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/58822] Segfault when calling make_shared

2016-04-12 Thread michi at triodia dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58822 --- Comment #27 from Michi Henning --- My apologies for my incredibly late reply. (I just stumbled across this issue again.) And my thanks to you for taking the time to analyse this! I think your analysis is right. 3.8.5/3: "- the pointer is im

<    1   2