[Bug c++/69009] [5/6 Regression] ICE in instantiate_decl, at cp/pt.c:21511

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69009 --- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Feb 8 19:22:57 2016 New Revision: 233226 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233226&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/69009 * pt.c (partial_specialization_p, impartial_

[Bug c++/10200] Weird clash with same names in different scopes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10200 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/69009] [5/6 Regression] ICE in instantiate_decl, at cp/pt.c:21511

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69009 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/69657] [6 Regression] abs() not inlined after including math.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69657 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/69723] Inconsistent report of unused and uninitialized variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69723 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/69723] Inconsistent report of unused and uninitialized variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69723 --- Comment #3 from Peter VARGA --- Dear Jakob, thank you for the explanation. But honestly, the "definition" when to warn is in my eyes wrong. Even var++ is reading and then setting the variable in this case it does NOT make sense! Just imagin

[Bug target/69614] [6 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-expensive-optimizations -fschedule-insns -mtpcs-leaf-frame -fira-algorithm=priority @ armv7a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69614 --- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law --- I'd have to look at the current DCE implementation to if it's still relevant -- in the past we used to emit clobbers like this to tell DCE that the clobbered value is totally written when the writes were spl

[Bug tree-optimization/68541] [6 Regression] Path splitting causes if-conversion miss

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68541 --- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Mon Feb 8 19:52:50 2016 New Revision: 233227 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233227&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/68541 * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/split-path-1.c

[Bug c++/10200] Weird clash with same names in different scopes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10200 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2016-01-22 00:00:00 |2016-2-8 --- Comment #32 from Jonathan

[Bug tree-optimization/69209] [6 Regression] ICE at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (verify_gimple failed)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69209 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Feb 8 20:07:56 2016 New Revision: 233228 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233228&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/69209 * ipa-split.c (split_function):

[Bug ipa/68721] [6 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68721 Bug 68721 depends on bug 69209, which changed state. Bug 69209 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (verify_gimple failed) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69209 What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/69209] [6 Regression] ICE at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (verify_gimple failed)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69209 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/69139] [4.9/5/6 Regression] deduction failure with trailing return type in function template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69139 Adam Butcher changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|abutcher at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/68654] [6 Regression] CoreMark Pro performance degradation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68654 --- Comment #23 from Jeffrey A. Law --- I don't think it's worth the effort to try and keep that list sorted. I think we can get what we want with a single walk over the IL just before coalescing. That addresses the stability issue. Then we w

[Bug tree-optimization/69599] [6 Regression] libgomp.c fipa-pta tests compiled with -flto -flto-partition=max fail in execution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69599 --- Comment #8 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- update patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-02/msg00598.html

[Bug lto/69707] FAIL: parallel-dims.c test for excess errors with -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69707 --- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- updated patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-02/msg00596.html

[Bug tree-optimization/67153] [5/6 Regression] integer optimizations 53% slower than std::bitset<>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67153 --- Comment #23 from Nathan Kurz --- > 1. As a correction: *without* the count takes twice as long to run as with, >or when using bitset<>. Oops, I did say that backwards. My tests agree with what you say. > 2. As a heuristic, favoring a

[Bug c++/69657] [6 Regression] abs() not inlined after including math.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69657 --- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Feb 8 22:07:54 2016 New Revision: 233229 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233229&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/69657 * name-lookup.c (do_nonmember_using_decl): L

[Bug c++/69657] [6 Regression] abs() not inlined after including math.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69657 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/69723] Inconsistent report of unused and uninitialized variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69723 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug target/69706] internal compiler error: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2246

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69706 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/69706] internal compiler error: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2246

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69706 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/69283] Auto deduction fails when ADL is required

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69283 --- Comment #2 from Patrick Palka --- Author: ppalka Date: Mon Feb 8 23:02:50 2016 New Revision: 233230 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233230&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix PR c++/69283 (auto deduction fails when ADL is required) gcc/cp/Chan

[Bug c++/67835] bug with auto-deduced return type and functions invoked via ADL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67835 --- Comment #2 from Patrick Palka --- Author: ppalka Date: Mon Feb 8 23:02:50 2016 New Revision: 233230 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233230&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix PR c++/69283 (auto deduction fails when ADL is required) gcc/cp/Chan

[Bug c++/69283] Auto deduction fails when ADL is required

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69283 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/69139] [4.9/5/6 Regression] deduction failure with trailing return type in function template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69139 --- Comment #7 from Patrick Palka --- Author: ppalka Date: Mon Feb 8 23:06:21 2016 New Revision: 233231 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233231&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix PR c++/69139 (deduction failure with trailing return type) gcc/cp/Ch

[Bug c++/67835] bug with auto-deduced return type and functions invoked via ADL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67835 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/69139] [4.9/5/6 Regression] deduction failure with trailing return type in function template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69139 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug bootstrap/68404] [6 Regression] PGO/LTO bootstrap failure on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68404 --- Comment #14 from Michael Meissner --- Created attachment 37634 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37634&action=edit Proposed patch to fix the problem

[Bug c++/69723] Inconsistent report of unused and uninitialized variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69723 --- Comment #5 from Peter VARGA --- I do not understand what you mean with "Replace unused++ with unused = unused + 1". How ever. I checked my example code in Compiler Explorer with clang and clang generates a warning as it should be. OK. You

[Bug bootstrap/68404] [6 Regression] PGO/LTO bootstrap failure on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68404 --- Comment #15 from Michael Meissner --- Markus Trippelsdorf: Could you try the patch that I attached to the bug? I get past the point that was failing before, but I get new errors (lto type not the same in the decnumber library), so I suspect

[Bug bootstrap/68404] [6 Regression] PGO/LTO bootstrap failure on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68404 --- Comment #16 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Michael Meissner from comment #15) > Markus Trippelsdorf: Could you try the patch that I attached to the bug? I > get past the point that was failing before, but I get new errors (lto typ

[Bug bootstrap/68404] [6 Regression] PGO/LTO bootstrap failure on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68404 --- Comment #17 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- And the "lto type not the same in decnumber" issue should go away with --disable-werror.

[Bug rtl-optimization/69714] [5 Regression] ffmpeg crc.c test miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69714 --- Comment #6 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2016-02-08, at 1:48 PM, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Do you know if it fails on the trunk? I retested trunk (revision 233199). My statement in comment #2 about trunk was incorrect. T

[Bug rtl-optimization/69714] [5/6 Regression] ffmpeg crc.c test miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69714 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[5 Regression] ffmpeg crc.c |[5/6 Regression] ffmpeg

[Bug rtl-optimization/69714] [5/6 Regression] ffmpeg crc.c test miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69714 --- Comment #8 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2016-02-08, at 7:07 PM, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > This might be reproducible on a PowerPC machine too (big-endian rather than > the > little-endian version). As it was mentioned i

[Bug libstdc++/69724] New: Unnecessary temporary object during std::thread construction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69724 Bug ID: 69724 Summary: Unnecessary temporary object during std::thread construction Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug go/69357] libgo refers to _end in a non-weak way

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69357 --- Comment #3 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ian Date: Tue Feb 9 00:34:55 2016 New Revision: 233235 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233235&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR go/69537 runtime: Don't refer to _end symbol in shar

[Bug middle-end/69537] [6 Regression] Incorrect -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning with enum variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69537 --- Comment #8 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ian Date: Tue Feb 9 00:34:55 2016 New Revision: 233235 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233235&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR go/69537 runtime: Don't refer to _end symbol in shar

[Bug c++/69723] pre-post-increment/decrement and reading the same variable that is assigned should not be considered uses for Wunused-but-set-variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69723 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCO

[Bug c/44677] Warn for variables incremented but not used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44677 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||developm...@faf-ltd.com --- Commen

[Bug target/69713] Invalid code of optimization in SH

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69713 --- Comment #6 from Kazumoto Kojima --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #5) > Anyway, I think this could be applied to GCC 5 and GCC 6. Kaz, what do you > think? Looks fine to me. Please go ahead.

[Bug go/69357] libgo refers to _end in a non-weak way

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69357 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/69725] New: profiledbootstrap failure due to unsats for isl functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69725 Bug ID: 69725 Summary: profiledbootstrap failure due to unsats for isl functions Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug other/69722] [6 Regression] gcc/doc/extend.texi:7526: warning: node `Constraints' is next for `Extended Asm' in menu but not in sectioning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69722 --- Comment #1 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 37635 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37635&action=edit patch

[Bug tree-optimization/69726] New: Bogus warnings with -O3 -Wuninitialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69726 Bug ID: 69726 Summary: Bogus warnings with -O3 -Wuninitialized Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimi

[Bug other/69722] [6 Regression] gcc/doc/extend.texi:7526: warning: node `Constraints' is next for `Extended Asm' in menu but not in sectioning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69722 --- Comment #2 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- I'm not seeing the warnings (different version of texinfo?), but I think I've tracked down the problem to incorrect sectioning added in r225122: r225122 | rth | 2015-06-29 07:35:19 -0700 (Mon, 29

[Bug other/69722] [6 Regression] gcc/doc/extend.texi:7526: warning: node `Constraints' is next for `Extended Asm' in menu but not in sectioning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69722 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to sandra from comment #2) > I'm not seeing the warnings (different version of texinfo?), but I think I am using texinfo-6.0-1.fc23.x86_64. > Can you verify that the attached patch fixes the warnings?

[Bug other/69722] [6 Regression] gcc/doc/extend.texi:7526: warning: node `Constraints' is next for `Extended Asm' in menu but not in sectioning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69722 --- Comment #4 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Tue Feb 9 03:25:30 2016 New Revision: 233236 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233236&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-02-08 Sandra Loosemore PR other/69722

[Bug bootstrap/68404] [6 Regression] PGO/LTO bootstrap failure on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68404 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org|meissner at gcc dot gnu.org -

[Bug bootstrap/68404] [6 Regression] PGO/LTO bootstrap failure on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68404 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #37634|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug bootstrap/69727] New: ICE in profiledbootstrap in reg_save_code at ../../gcc/caller-save.c:141

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69727 Bug ID: 69727 Summary: ICE in profiledbootstrap in reg_save_code at ../../gcc/caller-save.c:141 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug lto/69707] FAIL: parallel-dims.c test for excess errors with -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69707 --- Comment #6 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vries Date: Tue Feb 9 07:04:08 2016 New Revision: 233237 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233237&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Handle -fdiagnostics-color in lto 2016-02-09 Tom de Vries

[Bug lto/69707] FAIL: parallel-dims.c test for excess errors with -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69707 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug bootstrap/68404] [6 Regression] PGO/LTO bootstrap failure on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68404 --- Comment #20 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Your patch fixes the problem for me. Thanks. I've also successfully build Firefox and run the Boost testsuite with it. (the Boost testsuite hit the PR68973 ICE once with -mlra. I will reduce a testca

<    1   2