https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69206
Bug ID: 69206
Summary: testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/alias-2.c fails on
aarch64-linux-gnu at -O1 and above
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69206
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67462
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69207
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69207
Bug ID: 69207
Summary: [6 Regression] gcc.target/aarch64/vldN_1.c ICEs at -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68829
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67755
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69051
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69166
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67755
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
I'm still poking at it.
20160109 (experimental) (GCC)
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-v' '-B' './gcc' '-Os' '-g' '-ffixed-r13' '-c'
./gcc/cc1 -quiet -v -iprefix
/home/ysato/dev/gcc/rx/gcc/../lib/gcc/rx-elf/6.0.0/ -isystem ./gcc/include
-isystem ./gcc/include-fi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69155
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69208
Bug ID: 69208
Summary: &*this should not be const-qualified
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69155
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> I think we have a dup/related bug where we run into the issue that
> tree-complex.c
> wrecks SSA form during its rewrite.
That is indeed what happens, but what
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67086
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69191
--- Comment #11 from eyenseo at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #10)
> Use ldd to see which library is used at runtime. See what file that symlink
> points to. Compare with the version numbers of the releases.
>
> GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69196
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|sparc |
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69197
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69206
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68832
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69206
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69197
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note the referenced failure looks like it can be fixed by using -std=gnu89 as
part of the CFLAGS. That is it gcc 2.95 uses GNU 89 style inline which is
incompatible with C99 inline.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69207
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Depends
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69207
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69207
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Also it was passing here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2016-01/msg00584.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69113
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Sat Jan 9 11:15:26 2016
New Revision: 232189
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232189&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/69113
* decl2.c (comdat_linkage): Only set DECL_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69113
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67086
--- Comment #3 from vicencb at gmail dot com ---
Hello,
If this obsolete No_Run_Time pragma makes the compiler to fail and ask the user
to report a bug against GCC, then I would suggest completely deprecating it by
disallowing it.
In my opinion, i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69192
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69207
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Seems there is a mismatch in between fold_convertible_p and
verify_gimple_assign_unary (and also the gimplifier).
E.g. for this special case fold_convertible_p has some weird exception:
2188 return (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69204
Dmitry Vyukov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dvyukov at google dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67086
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Bet diagnosic this is fine and correct, but it shouldn't cause an ICE, but
fatal_error.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67462
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69204
--- Comment #4 from bugzil...@reto-schneider.ch ---
Created attachment 37295
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37295&action=edit
g++-5 -fsanitize=thread -Wall -Wextra -std=c++11 -pthread -static-libtsan
tsan-test.cpp && ./a.out
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69204
--- Comment #5 from bugzil...@reto-schneider.ch ---
The generated binaries use the same libraries:
$ clang++-3.6 -fsanitize=thread -Wall -Wextra -std=c++11 -pthread -o
tsan-test-clang tsan-test.cpp
$ ldd tsan-test-clang
linux-vdso.so.1 (0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69202
--- Comment #3 from timeraider at gmx dot at ---
Thank you for the clarification. There is something new to learn in C/C++
programming every day ;-).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23087
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69129
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose ---
still seen with r232188
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67462
--- Comment #6 from Bernd Schmidt ---
That does look dodgy. It's also really old, from when rtx_cost was part of
cse.c. Kenner added it along with many other changes in r754 in 1992.
See what happens to codegen if you just strip SUBREGs before t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69209
Bug ID: 69209
Summary: ICE at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu
(verify_gimple failed)
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69209
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68743
--- Comment #27 from John David Anglin ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Jan 9 18:13:44 2016
New Revision: 232191
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232191&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/68743
* match.pd: Require target has
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68743
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69210
Bug ID: 69210
Summary: False positives from -Wsuggest-final-types/methods
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Comp
--enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20160109 (experimental) [trunk revision 232190] (GCC)
$ g++-trunk -c abc.cc
abc.cc: In function ?void fn1()?:
abc.cc:2:6: error: type mismatch in binary expression
void fn1() { (a & 5UL | (b = 4, 4L)) > 4; }
^~~
long unsigned in
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20160109 (experimental) [trunk revision 232190] (GCC)
$ g++-trunk -c -O3 abc.cc
abc.cc: In function ?void fn2(int)?:
abc.cc:10:19: error: unknown register name ?? in ?asm?
asm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69211
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69212
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
Summary|g++ ICE (segfault
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69212
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
k/root-gcc
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20160109 (experimental) [trunk revision 232190] (GCC)
$ g++-trunk -c -O3 abc.c
abc.c: In function ?void fn1()?:
abc.c:2:40: error: invalid 'asm': operand number out of range
void fn1(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69213
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69179
--- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth ---
Note that weak_import was added by Geoffrey Keating in...
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-10/msg02441.html
and tweaked in...
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-01/msg00146.html
The last time G
--disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20160109 (experimental) [trunk revision 232190] (GCC)
$ gcc-trunk -c -Os abc.c
Unable to coalesce ssa_names 2 and 17 which are marked as MUST COALESCE.
d_2(ab) and d_17(ab)
abc.c: In function 'foo':
abc.c:8:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69214
--- Comment #1 from Qirun Zhang ---
Here is a smaller case:
long a;
extern int fun1();
extern void fun2();
extern void setjmp();
void foo() {
int d = 0;
fun2();
setjmp();
a = d;
d = 8;
!a && fun1();
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69214
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Depends on|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69215
Bug ID: 69215
Summary: Improve diagnostic for 'for(i : v)'
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69215
--- Comment #1 from graham.stott at btinternet dot com ---
Ok thats quick only 1 hour plus 2 hour car airport.
I been by train long time sleep on train in bed and by bus both 12 hrs if I
recall correctly.
Might be home now.
😍
Origin
57 matches
Mail list logo
