[Bug inline-asm/61692] ICE in extract_insn in recog.c for asm with many parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61692 --- Comment #4 from David --- (In reply to m...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #3) > This test case isn't portable. If upped to 40 then it would be more > portable. What platform supports more than 30 operands? As near as I can see, MAX_RECOG_OPERAN

[Bug middle-end/65874] [5 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure (gcc/ira.o) on ia64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65874 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/67438] [6 Regression] ~X op ~Y pattern relocation causes loop performance degradation on 32bit x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67438 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/68502] [6 Regression][i686] spec2000/179.art runfails after r222914

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68502 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Nov 25 08:46:34 2015 New Revision: 230854 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230854&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-11-25 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/68502

[Bug tree-optimization/68492] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in vect_is_simple_use, at tree-vect-stmts.c:8266

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68492 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Nov 25 08:53:22 2015 New Revision: 230855 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230855&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-11-25 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/68492

[Bug c++/68525] [6 Regression] bogus use of deleted function error on a template with a flexible array member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68525 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/67089] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Integer overflow checks not optimized on x86/x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67089 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Nov 25 08:58:32 2015 New Revision: 230856 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230856&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/67089 * tree-ssa-math-opts.c (uaddsub_overflow_c

[Bug c++/68530] [C++14] sorry, unimplemented: unexpected AST of kind loop_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68530 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/68206] ICE: unimplemented: unexpected AST of kind loop_expr in potential_constant_expression_1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68206 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/68533] New: bogus location for "warning: ‘struct s3’ declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68533 Bug ID: 68533 Summary: bogus location for "warning: ‘struct s3’ declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration" Product: gcc

[Bug c++/60025] Static member of class not found if class name == name of namespace it's defined in

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60025 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/68188] Ambiguous code gets compiled successfully when class and its namespace have the same name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68188 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini --- *** Bug 60025 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/68180] [ICE] at cp/constexpr.c:2768 in initializing __vector in a loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68180 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/68486] [6 Regression] 187.facerec in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68486 James Greenhalgh changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug target/68535] New: arm.c: 5 * set but not used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68535 Bug ID: 68535 Summary: arm.c: 5 * set but not used Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: target Assigne

[Bug fortran/68534] New: No error on mismatch in number of arguments between submodule and module interface

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68534 Bug ID: 68534 Summary: No error on mismatch in number of arguments between submodule and module interface Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug tree-optimization/68529] scev failed for while(i--)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68529 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/68534] No error on mismatch in number of arguments between submodule and module interface

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68534 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/68144] operator~ in trailing return type leads to spurrious error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68144 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/65091] decltype(~arg) fails for template functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65091 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||joel.falcou at lri dot fr --- Comment #6

[Bug c++/68096] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault(program cc1plus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68096 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/68528] Wrong constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68528 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug c++/68161] Inconsistent behaviour of unnamed field with inheritance.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68161 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug tree-optimization/68502] [6 Regression][i686] spec2000/179.art runfails after r222914

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68502 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/68517] [6 Regression] ICE in tree-vect-data-refs.c:2751

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68517 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Nov 25 09:22:47 2015 New Revision: 230858 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230858&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-11-25 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/68517

[Bug tree-optimization/68526] [6 Regression] gcc.target/powerpc/recip-4.c fails starting with r230492

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68526 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug tree-optimization/68517] [6 Regression] ICE in tree-vect-data-refs.c:2751

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68517 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/68522] [6 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 435.gromacs miscomparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68522 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/68521] [6.0 regression] ICE on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68521 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 36832 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36832&action=edit unrelated(?) patch Yeah, note that tree-complex.c is structured in a way that exposes SSA name uses without ac

[Bug tree-optimization/68521] [6.0 regression] ICE on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68521 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- I get some (unrelated) ICE in my heavily patched dev tree with that patch so cannot verify it does anything good.

[Bug tree-optimization/68521] [6.0 regression] ICE on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68521 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug c++/67983] ICE: Error reporting routines re-entered.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67983 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/68521] [6.0 regression] ICE on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68521 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > I get some (unrelated) ICE in my heavily patched dev tree with that patch so > cannot verify it does anything good. Ah, it's the patch itself not working (domw

[Bug rtl-optimization/68435] [6 Regression] Missed if-conversion optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68435 --- Comment #10 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Wed Nov 25 09:48:29 2015 New Revision: 230859 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230859&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [RTL-ifcvt] PR rtl-optimization/68435 Allow (c ? x++ : x-

[Bug rtl-optimization/68435] [6 Regression] Missed if-conversion optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68435 --- Comment #11 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- The RTL if-conversion issue should be fixed now. So now only the path-splitting problem remains?

[Bug tree-optimization/68528] Wrong constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68528 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- at -O0 we have in .original int t = 1; because when we fold INT_MIN - (int) ((unsigned int) x0 - (unsigned int) x1) we go through /* A - B -> A + (-B) if B is easily negatable. */ if (negat

[Bug c++/58910] std::Tuple_impl is non constexpr when using identical userdefined structs as template-args

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58910 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini --- Indeed. Let's play safe and add a testcase before closing the bug as fixed for 5+.

[Bug middle-end/68528] Wrong constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68528 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Component|tree-optimi

[Bug c++/58910] std::Tuple_impl is non constexpr when using identical userdefined structs as template-args

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58910 --- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Nov 25 10:00:02 2015 New Revision: 230860 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230860&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-11-25 Paolo Carlini PR c++/58910 * g++

[Bug c++/58910] std::Tuple_impl is non constexpr when using identical userdefined structs as template-args

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58910 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/55004] [meta-bug] constexpr issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004 Bug 55004 depends on bug 58910, which changed state. Bug 58910 Summary: std::Tuple_impl is non constexpr when using identical userdefined structs as template-args https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58910 What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/68492] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in vect_is_simple_use, at tree-vect-stmts.c:8266

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68492 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/68535] arm.c: 5 * set but not used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68535 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/67824] constexpr char* compare operations not constexpr, but char[] operations ARE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67824 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/59856] Support sparse-style context checking, used to validate locking correctness

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59856 --- Comment #14 from PaX Team --- (In reply to Josh Triplett from comment #13) > That sounds really plausible to me. GCC's constant propagation seems likely > to do *at least* as well as Sparse does, if not better. (As long as you > have optimi

[Bug rtl-optimization/68536] New: LRA ICEs with new arm pattern

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68536 Bug ID: 68536 Summary: LRA ICEs with new arm pattern Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/68537] New: Vectorizer possibly miscompiles dynamic linker with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68537 Bug ID: 68537 Summary: Vectorizer possibly miscompiles dynamic linker with -O3 Product: gcc Version: unknown URL: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19289

[Bug tree-optimization/68529] scev failed for while(i--)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68529 --- Comment #2 from majun --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Confirmed, mine. This happens because get_inner_reference converts nchar_14 > to sizetype and thus we analyze the evolution of (uint64_t) nchar_14 which > isn't affine

[Bug tree-optimization/68529] scev failed for while(i--)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68529 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 25 Nov 2015, majun4950646 at 163 dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68529 > > --- Comment #2 from majun --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > >

[Bug tree-optimization/68529] scev failed for while(i--)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68529 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug preprocessor/62661] digit separator warning in if'ed out code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62661 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/68537] Vectorizer possibly miscompiles dynamic linker with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68537 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fw at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 fr

[Bug tree-optimization/68537] Vectorizer possibly miscompiles dynamic linker with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68537 --- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- 1470 <_dl_lookup_symbol_x>: 1470: 55 push %rbp 1471: 48 89 e5mov%rsp,%rbp 1474: 41 57 push %r15

[Bug plugins/61176] plugin builds including gimple.h not building

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61176 --- Comment #20 from PaX Team --- update for gcc-6: /gcc/params.list is also needed now as it gets included by params.h.

[Bug target/68538] New: ICE in gen_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:1027 when cross-compiling for cris-linux-gnu target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68538 Bug ID: 68538 Summary: ICE in gen_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:1027 when cross-compiling for cris-linux-gnu target Product: gcc Version: 5.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sev

[Bug tree-optimization/68537] Vectorizer possibly miscompiles dynamic linker with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68537 --- Comment #3 from Florian Weimer --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #0) > rbp0x7fffa148 0x7fffa148 (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #2) > 1470 <_dl_lookup_symbol_x>: > 1470:

[Bug target/66112] __builtin_mul_overflow for int16_t emits poor code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66112 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug rtl-optimization/68435] [6 Regression] Missed if-conversion optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68435 Alexander Fomin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/68537] Vectorizer possibly miscompiles dynamic linker with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68537 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-* Component|tree-opti

[Bug target/68538] ICE in gen_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:1027 when cross-compiling for cris-linux-gnu target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68538 --- Comment #1 from dhowells at redhat dot com --- The cross-compiler was built from unpatched gcc sources produced from a gcc SVN branch with the following parameters: DATE 20151104 SVNREV 229753 gcc_version 5.2.1 The compiler was configured a

[Bug rtl-optimization/68537] Vectorizer possibly miscompiles dynamic linker with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68537 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/68537] Vectorizer possibly miscompiles dynamic linker with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68537 --- Comment #6 from Florian Weimer --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #5) > Ok. Well, I'm running GHC version 7.10.2, which is the latest. > (Not sure how to report this issue to the ghc folks). To be honest, if Richard thinks th

[Bug rtl-optimization/68537] Vectorizer possibly miscompiles dynamic linker with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68537 --- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #6) > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #5) > > > Ok. Well, I'm running GHC version 7.10.2, which is the latest. > > (Not sure how to report this is

[Bug rtl-optimization/68432] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in expand_insn, at optabs.c:6947

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68432 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-

[Bug rtl-optimization/68537] Vectorizer possibly miscompiles dynamic linker with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68537 --- Comment #8 from Florian Weimer --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #7) > Well, only Haskell programs crash. This is a valid point. You can open a GHC ticket in Trac, after registering:

[Bug bootstrap/68540] New: 6.0 build process broken on Linux Mint, potential include ordering problem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68540 Bug ID: 68540 Summary: 6.0 build process broken on Linux Mint, potential include ordering problem Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug rtl-optimization/68432] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in expand_insn, at optabs.c:6947

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68432 --- Comment #11 from Joost VandeVondele --- (In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #10) > Series finally posted here: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg03020.html > > Sorry for the delay. Many thanks for fixing this

[Bug rtl-optimization/68537] Vectorizer possibly miscompiles dynamic linker with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68537 --- Comment #9 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- For the curious: https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/11133

[Bug tree-optimization/68541] New: [6 Regression] Path splitting causes if-conversion miss

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68541 Bug ID: 68541 Summary: [6 Regression] Path splitting causes if-conversion miss Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization

[Bug rtl-optimization/68435] [6 Regression] Missed if-conversion optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68435 --- Comment #13 from Alexander Fomin --- Filed PR68541

[Bug c++/68087] [5/6 Regression] ICE with constexpr in array with negative index

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68087 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug rtl-optimization/68537] Vectorizer possibly miscompiles dynamic linker with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68537 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #6) > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #5) > > > Ok. Well, I'm running GHC version 7.10.2, which is the latest. > > (Not sure how to report this issue

[Bug tree-optimization/68541] [6 Regression] Path splitting causes if-conversion miss

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68541 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/68532] [ARM] Incorrect code result on arm big endian

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68532 cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/68541] [6 Regression] Path splitting causes if-conversion miss

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68541 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- It also looks like the "inner loop" will always have two exits now, one to the outer loop and one to the original exit block. That doesn't sound like sth desirable in any way (unless we can jump-thread one

[Bug middle-end/68542] New: [6 Regression] 10% 481.wrf performance regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68542 Bug ID: 68542 Summary: [6 Regression] 10% 481.wrf performance regression Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/67778] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2297

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67778 --- Comment #2 from Zhendong Su --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #1) > I can't reproduce this error with today's trunk (6.0.0 20151125) on x86_64. > I see a similar stack trace in bug 60598 but that was fixed over a

[Bug fortran/68534] No error on mismatch in number of arguments between submodule and module interface

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68534 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 36836 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36836&action=edit Draft patch for the PR The attached bootstraps and regtests OK on a tree heavily polluted by the recursive alloca

[Bug target/63773] [meta-bug] Restoring darwin bootstrap for gcc 5.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773 --- Comment #27 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #26 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- > Are there any symbols in .text? If so, this is wrong. All symbols have to > have 1 or more bytes after them. This is just how the

[Bug target/63773] [meta-bug] Restoring darwin bootstrap for gcc 5.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773 --- Comment #28 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 36837 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36837&action=edit .i/.s/.o for 32-bit link failure

[Bug middle-end/68528] Wrong constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68528 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||6.0 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener

[Bug middle-end/68528] Wrong constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68528 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Nov 25 14:21:25 2015 New Revision: 230870 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230870&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-11-25 Richard Biener PR middle-end/68528 * fol

[Bug middle-end/68542] [6 Regression] 10% 481.wrf performance regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68542 Ilya Enkovich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/68542] [6 Regression] 10% 481.wrf performance regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68542 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug c++/68385] [6 Regression] ICE building libstdc++ on arm-none-eabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68385 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Nov 25 14:35:24 2015 New Revision: 230871 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230871&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/68385 * tree.c (integer_zerop, integer_onep, integ

[Bug fortran/63858] fixed form OpenACC directive ICE with -fopenacc -fopenmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63858 --- Comment #7 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: cesar Date: Wed Nov 25 14:37:36 2015 New Revision: 230872 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230872&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR fortran/63858 gcc/fortran/ * scanner

[Bug middle-end/68542] [6 Regression] 10% 481.wrf performance regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68542 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Ok, so previously we if-converted but with versioning and thus the if-converted loop was not vectorized and thrown away? So yes, for such cases we'd ideally have vector control-flow if (!all-zero) { ...

[Bug fortran/63858] fixed form OpenACC directive ICE with -fopenacc -fopenmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63858 cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug fortran/68486] [6 Regression] 187.facerec in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68486 --- Comment #17 from Steve Kargl --- On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 09:15:04AM +, jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > > Of course. As I stated, it won't hurt anything. > > FAILs in the testsuite are not a problem. The > > issue with EXPR_

[Bug fortran/68227] ICE on using variable limit in forall header (gfc_do_allocate)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68227 --- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Wed Nov 25 15:04:33 2015 New Revision: 230873 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230873&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-11-25 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/68227 * trans-

[Bug fortran/68227] ICE on using variable limit in forall header (gfc_do_allocate)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68227 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0 --- Comment #7 from kargl

[Bug fortran/68227] ICE on using variable limit in forall header (gfc_do_allocate)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68227 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug middle-end/66214] [6 Regression] ICE verify_type failed with -O0 -g via gen_type_die_with_usage's dwarf2out.c:20250

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66214 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug fortran/68227] ICE on using variable limit in forall header (gfc_do_allocate)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68227 İsmail Dönmez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ismail at i10z dot com --- Comment #9 fr

[Bug tree-optimization/68529] scev failed for while(i--)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68529 --- Comment #5 from bin.cheng --- The dump before ldist is as below: foo1 () { unsigned int nchar; char c[1]; : c = {}; : # nchar_14 = PHI c[nchar_14] = 65; nchar_5 = nchar_14 + 4294967295; if (nchar_14 != 0) goto ;

[Bug libstdc++/56158] bad enum values computed by operator~ in ios_base.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56158 --- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed Nov 25 16:11:40 2015 New Revision: 230884 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230884&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Extend valid values of iostream bitmask types Backport from mainline 20

[Bug fortran/68227] ICE on using variable limit in forall header (gfc_do_allocate)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68227 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > This test currently fails on Linux x86-64 machine. Is there a way to get a > better debug output for the failure. For now I see: > > FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr68227.f90 -O (internal compiler error) > F

[Bug fortran/68486] [6 Regression] 187.facerec in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68486 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/67778] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2297

--- ICE on the test case from comment #2 confirmed with today's trunk (6.0.0 20151125).

[Bug c++/68087] [5/6 Regression] ICE with constexpr in array with negative index

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68087 --- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Nov 25 16:40:16 2015 New Revision: 230886 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230886&root=gcc&view=rev Log: /cp 2015-11-25 Markus Trippelsdorf Paolo Carlini

  1   2   >