https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68084
David changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gccbugzilla@limegreensocks.
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68081
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse ---
For intrinsics, gcc mostly considers Intel as the standard, so the
documentation would be https://software.intel.com/en-us/node/523865 .
: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: roger.ferrer at bsc dot es
Target Milestone: ---
Hi,
GCC 6.0.0 20151025 and 5.2 crash with an ICE with the following code:
-- ice.cc
constexpr char c[] = "hello";
constexpr const char *p =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68087
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
St
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68081
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey Walton ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #4)
> For intrinsics, gcc mostly considers Intel as the standard, so the
> documentation would be https://software.intel.com/en-us/node/523865 .
Thanks Andrew.
Please
ran
--prefix=/mnt/svn/gcc-trunk/binary-229293-lto-fortran-checking-yes-rtl-df-disable-bootstrap-disable-graphite-aarch64/
--without-cloog --without-ppl --without-isl --host=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
--target=aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu --build=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
--with-sysroot=/home/aarch64-chroot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68087
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Perhaps:
diff --git a/gcc/cp/constexpr.c b/gcc/cp/constexpr.c
index ebca411..0828a90 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/constexpr.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/constexpr.c
@@ -1782,8 +1782,7 @@ cxx_eval_array_reference (const const
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68088
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note it might also effect arm*-*-* too but only with -mcpu=cortext-a57 .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68088
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68081
--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse ---
This comment makes no sense (sorry, couldn't find a nice way to say it).
> Intel builds software
We are talking about gcc, not Intel software. Documentation is not fast or
slow.
> Microsoft has lots of footn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66927
--- Comment #9 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Sun Oct 25 12:28:57 2015
New Revision: 229294
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229294&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
2015-10-25 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67044
--- Comment #3 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Sun Oct 25 12:28:57 2015
New Revision: 229294
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229294&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
2015-10-25 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68081
--- Comment #7 from Jeffrey Walton ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #6)
> This comment makes no sense (sorry, couldn't find a nice way to say it).
>
> > Intel builds software
>
> We are talking about gcc, not Intel software. Documentat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61830
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
The ICE is fixed by the patch submitted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-10/msg00117.html.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66927
--- Comment #10 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Sun Oct 25 13:02:32 2015
New Revision: 229295
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229295&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Added missing testcases of r229294 for patch of
PR fortran/6692
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61819
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution|DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68084
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68084
--- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Sun Oct 25 13:21:01 2015
New Revision: 229296
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229296&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/68084
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_md_asm_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68084
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68078
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|2015-1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68078
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #2 from Joost Vande
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67600
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68079
--- Comment #4 from John David Anglin ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sun Oct 25 15:18:48 2015
New Revision: 229299
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229299&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/68079
* dojump.c (do_compare_and_jump)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68079
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68079
--- Comment #6 from John David Anglin ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sun Oct 25 15:42:19 2015
New Revision: 229300
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229300&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/68079
* dojump.c (do_compare_and_jump)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68079
--- Comment #7 from John David Anglin ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sun Oct 25 15:45:33 2015
New Revision: 229301
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229301&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/68079
* dojump.c (do_compare_and_jump)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57117
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68089
Bug ID: 68089
Summary: c++ friend with template
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66927
--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu ---
On Linux/ia32, I got
spawn [open ...]^M
*** Error in `./allocate_with_source_10.exe': free(): invalid next size (fast):
0x09dcebc8 ***
Program received signal SIGSEGV: Segmentation fault - invalid memory referen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66927
--- Comment #12 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I can confirm that issue. Don't know how to fix it yet, though. Looks like the
scalarizer is not coping correctly with a AS_DEFERRED array.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36192
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68090
Bug ID: 68090
Summary: VLA compound literal -- "confused by earlier errors,
bailing out"
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61830
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67171
--- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Oct 25 21:31:12 2015
New Revision: 229303
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229303&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-25 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/67171
* trans-array.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61819
--- Comment #13 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Oct 25 21:31:12 2015
New Revision: 229303
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229303&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-25 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/67171
* trans-array.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61830
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Oct 25 21:31:12 2015
New Revision: 229303
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229303&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-25 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/67171
* trans-array.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67171
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61819
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #14 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61830
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas ---
Fixed on trunk - I'll see what I can do for the earlier branches.
Thanks for the report
Paul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67528
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68091
Bug ID: 68091
Summary: [6 Regression] [SH] internal compiler error: in
expand_vec_cond_expr, at optabs.c:5391
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keyw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68014
David changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|minor |enhancement
--- Comment #1 from David ---
In fa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68092
Bug ID: 68092
Summary: [possibly concepts] ICE: symtab_node::verify failed.
Overloaded function by concept requires
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68092
--- Comment #1 from Christian Butcher ---
Will keep working on a (non-compilable) test case. If someone is interested,
can upload full sources for this class
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68092
--- Comment #2 from Christian Butcher ---
Created attachment 36582
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36582&action=edit
main function (1/3)
First of 3 files to demonstrate problem. (Not)Compiled with g++ -std=c++1z
conceptFunct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68092
--- Comment #4 from Christian Butcher ---
Created attachment 36584
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36584&action=edit
Class cpp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68092
--- Comment #3 from Christian Butcher ---
Created attachment 36583
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36583&action=edit
Class header
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68092
--- Comment #5 from Christian Butcher ---
Comment 2 has the wrong error (previous testcase with cout statements)
Correct error:
class.cpp:13:26: error: Two symbols with same comdat_group are not linked by
the same_comdat_group list.
template c
;
TS ts2;
auto x = []{
f(ts1);
f(ts2);
};
$ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 6.0.0 20151025 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68094
Bug ID: 68094
Summary: Compiler segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68091
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67918
--- Comment #6 from Nameless <11throwaway11 at outlook dot com> ---
Another update:
In Crypto++ there was a class with a virtual function, in a header file:
https://github.com/weidai11/cryptopp/blob/b7de164d6251dc066123b59bc15d30c74e920756/modes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68095
Bug ID: 68095
Summary: "cc" clobber with Flag Output Operands
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: inline-asm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68092
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
54 matches
Mail list logo
