[Bug tree-optimization/67908] gcc segfaults with -fstack-check (internal compiler error) / armv7 host and target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67908 --- Comment #4 from Stefan Keller --- So I rebuilt gcc: GNU C99 (GCC) version 5.2.0 (armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf) compiled by GNU C version 5.2.0, GMP version 6.0.0, MPFR version 3.1.3-p4, MPC version 1.0.3 GGC heuristics: --param ggc

[Bug testsuite/67959] "width of 'code' exceeds its type" error in ssa-thread-13

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67959 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug tree-optimization/67971] New: Failure to unify conditional argument selection with conditional result selection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67971 Bug ID: 67971 Summary: Failure to unify conditional argument selection with conditional result selection Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/67961] Incorrect type of meber of struct in error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67961 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/67935] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67935 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|niqingliang2003 at gmail dot com | Severity|critical

[Bug fortran/47469] Check whether arrayfunc_assign_needs_temporary misses TBP/PPC attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47469 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #5) > Well, this PR has been rotting for more than four years and a half. I was > only pointing to the fact that the initial patch no longer applies. > > If you k

[Bug fortran/67972] New: Substrings of arrays of unicode strings are of type DEFAULT rather than ISO_10646

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67972 Bug ID: 67972 Summary: Substrings of arrays of unicode strings are of type DEFAULT rather than ISO_10646 Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severit

[Bug other/66887] trunk/libmpx/mpxrt/mpxrt.c:158: possible performance problem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66887 --- Comment #3 from Ilya Enkovich --- Author: ienkovich Date: Thu Oct 15 09:26:39 2015 New Revision: 228838 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228838&root=gcc&view=rev Log: libmpx/ PR other/66887 * mpxrt/mpxrt.c (read_mpx_stat

[Bug other/65530] [meta-bug] -mmpx -fcheck-pointer-bounds failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65530 Bug 65530 depends on bug 66887, which changed state. Bug 66887 Summary: trunk/libmpx/mpxrt/mpxrt.c:158: possible performance problem https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66887 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug other/66887] trunk/libmpx/mpxrt/mpxrt.c:158: possible performance problem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66887 Ilya Enkovich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/67972] Substrings of arrays of unicode strings are of type DEFAULT rather than ISO_10646

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67972 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNC

[Bug libfortran/48958] Add runtime diagnostics for SIZE intrinsic function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48958 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- This PR is related to pr46182. While I agree that it would be nice to have run time errors for invalid use of unallocated variables/not associated pointers, I doubt it will ever happen.

[Bug tree-optimization/67971] Failure to unify conditional argument selection with conditional result selection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67971 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/67953] [6 Regression] match.pd: X - (X / Y) * Y wrong on change of sign

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67953 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Thu Oct 15 09:39:35 2015 New Revision: 228839 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228839&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/67953 * match.pd (X - (X / Y) * Y)

[Bug tree-optimization/67953] [6 Regression] match.pd: X - (X / Y) * Y wrong on change of sign

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67953 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/67971] Failure to unify conditional argument selection with conditional result selection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67971 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/67967] [5.2/6 Regression] ICE in i386_pe_seh_unwind_emit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67967 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Component|c

[Bug middle-end/67966] [6 regression] ICE in convert_move, at expr.c:282

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67966 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener

[Bug tree-optimization/67945] [6 Regression] Testsuite failures starting with revision 228616

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67945 --- Comment #11 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rsandifo Date: Thu Oct 15 09:50:07 2015 New Revision: 228840 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228840&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR67945: Fix oscillation between pow representations T

[Bug tree-optimization/67945] [6 Regression] Testsuite failures starting with revision 228616

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67945 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolutio

[Bug target/67963] -march=lakemont generates x87 instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67963 --- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak --- I have a patch that moves -m80387 to ISA flags.

[Bug sanitizer/67513] ASAN: Not optimal shadow value check (unlikely condition checked in fast path)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67513 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|mpolacek at gcc d

[Bug rtl-optimization/67443] [5/6 regression] DSE removes required store instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67443 --- Comment #10 from Dominik Vogt --- This is what's happening: Before the dse2 pass, there is a store instruction (25) followed by a read instruction later (29): --- # store first byte (insn 25 135 136 4 (set (mem/j:QI (reg/v/f:DI 2 %r2 [orig:

[Bug c++/67926] Using folding expressions in a constexpr context ice's

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67926 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/67443] [5/6 regression] DSE removes required store instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67443 --- Comment #11 from Dominik Vogt --- This is the bug report for the problem that the patch fixed: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64557

[Bug rtl-optimization/64557] get_addr in true_dependence_1 cannot handle VALUE inside an expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64557 Dominik Vogt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com --- Commen

[Bug target/61577] [4.9.0] can't compile on hp-ux v3 ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577 Joseph John changed: What|Removed |Added CC||josephpattara at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/67963] -march=lakemont generates x87 instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67963 --- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #4) > I have a patch that moves -m80387 to ISA flags. Not really. To be attached much simpler patch introduces PTA_NO_80387 and changes target flags instead.

[Bug target/67963] -march=lakemont generates x87 instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67963 --- Comment #6 from Uroš Bizjak --- Created attachment 36516 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36516&action=edit Patch that introduces PTA_NO_80387

[Bug debug/65809] [5/6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/pr65771.c -gstabs+* -O* (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65809 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/67973] New: All the tests for -gstabs* fail on x86_64-apple-darwin14 with Xcode 7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67973 Bug ID: 67973 Summary: All the tests for -gstabs* fail on x86_64-apple-darwin14 with Xcode 7 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/57413] FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/discriminator.c scan-assembler on x86_64-apple-darwin10, Solaris/x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57413 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/67963] -march=lakemont generates x87 instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67963 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #36516|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/61577] [4.9.0] can't compile on hp-ux v3 ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577 --- Comment #4 from Joseph John --- I tried with source build for 4.9.2 and 4.9.3 but both of them resulted in same ld relocation error.

[Bug testsuite/67974] New: Missing gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/x86_64/abi/avx/asm-support-darwin.s file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67974 Bug ID: 67974 Summary: Missing gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/x86_64/abi/avx/asm-support-da rwin.s file Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/67975] New: Failure to optimise equality between two call sequences

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67975 Bug ID: 67975 Summary: Failure to optimise equality between two call sequences Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Pri

[Bug target/67963] -march=lakemont generates x87 instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67963 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #7) > Created attachment 36517 [details] > V2 patch that introduces PTA_NO_80387 We need some testcases to verify it works on command line as well as with __attribute__((targe

[Bug testsuite/67974] Missing gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/x86_64/abi/avx/asm-support-darwin.s file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67974 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/67975] Failure to optimise equality between two call sequences

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67975 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status|

[Bug tree-optimization/67975] Failure to optimise equality between two call sequences

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67975 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug middle-end/67966] [6 regression] ICE in convert_move, at expr.c:282

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67966 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/67966] [6 regression] ICE in convert_move, at expr.c:282

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67966 --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou --- It's again a move between a BLKmode RHS and a DImode LHS. Frankly, I don't understand why this is now allowed to reach the RTL expander, we will probably need to add conversions on quite a number of paths in

[Bug go/67976] New: Cgo + Gccgo not working like Cgo + Golang?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67976 Bug ID: 67976 Summary: Cgo + Gccgo not working like Cgo + Golang? Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: go

[Bug go/67968] go1: internal compiler error: in write_specific_type_functions, at go/gofrontend/types.cc:1812

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67968 Dominik Vogt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com --- Commen

[Bug debug/65779] [5/6 Regression] undefined local symbol on powerpc [regression]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65779 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug bootstrap/66319] [6 Regression] gcov-tool.c:84:65: error: invalid conversion from 'int (*)(const c har*, const stat*, int, FTW*)' to 'int (*)(const char*, const stat*, int, FTW)'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66319 Joseph John changed: What|Removed |Added CC||josephpattara at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/67966] [6 regression] ICE in convert_move, at expr.c:282

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67966 --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou --- Our internal x86 tester finally recovered from the r288586 build breakage and reports another failure mode, namely an ICE in store_field, at expr.c:6690.

[Bug other/60158] powerpc: usage of the .data.rel.ro.local section

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60158 joakim.tjernlund at transmode dot se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||joakim.tjernlund@

[Bug target/67281] HTM builtins aren't treated as compiler barriers on powerpc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67281 --- Comment #7 from Peter Bergner --- Author: bergner Date: Thu Oct 15 16:38:47 2015 New Revision: 228846 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228846&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport from mainline 2015-10-14 Peter Bergner

[Bug target/67281] HTM builtins aren't treated as compiler barriers on powerpc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67281 --- Comment #8 from Peter Bergner --- Author: bergner Date: Thu Oct 15 16:40:14 2015 New Revision: 228847 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228847&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport from mainline 2015-10-14 Peter Bergner

[Bug target/67281] HTM builtins aren't treated as compiler barriers on powerpc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67281 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc*-linux Status|UNCONF

[Bug fortran/67977] New: allocatable strings, array section reallocated - non-standard behaviour

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67977 Bug ID: 67977 Summary: allocatable strings, array section reallocated - non-standard behaviour Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/67978] New: dead code elimination deleted the predicated branch within the function block.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67978 Bug ID: 67978 Summary: dead code elimination deleted the predicated branch within the function block. Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug boehm-gc/66848] boehm-gc fails test suite on x86_64-apple-darwin15

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66848 --- Comment #14 from Jack Howarth --- I finally got around to rebuilding the Apple open source release of libunwind-35.3 from 10.10.5 under Xcode 7 on 10.10.5. The results are rather interesting as the default build is a Debug one compiled at -O0

[Bug c/67979] New: dead code elimination deleted the predicated branch within the function block.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67979 Bug ID: 67979 Summary: dead code elimination deleted the predicated branch within the function block. Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/67880] [ARM] -fno-align-functions does not work for thumb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67880 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/67745] [ARM] wrong alignments when __attribute__ ((optimize,target,align) is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67745 --- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan --- *** Bug 67880 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug boehm-gc/66848] boehm-gc fails test suite on x86_64-apple-darwin15

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66848 --- Comment #15 from Jack Howarth --- (In reply to Jack Howarth from comment #14) > I finally got around to rebuilding the Apple open source release of > libunwind-35.3 from 10.10.5 under Xcode 7 on 10.10.5. The results are rather > interesting a

[Bug target/67871] LTO falis for ARM big-endian

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67871 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/67979] dead code elimination deleted the predicated branch within the function block.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67979 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/67929] [4.9/5/6 Regression][arm] Wrong code for FP mult-by-power-of-2 + int conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67929 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/67973] All the tests for -gstabs* fail on x86_64-apple-darwin14 with Xcode 7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67973 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug target/67973] All the tests for -gstabs* fail on x86_64-apple-darwin14 with Xcode 7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67973 --- Comment #2 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Ah, found it, use the GNU assembler. Maybe a little tricky, as one day, even that will be removed. At that point, I think we just reject the -gstabs option. The other option, is to just reject tha

[Bug c/67979] dead code elimination deleted the predicated branch within the function block.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67979 zet changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug c++/67980] New: left shift count is negative [-Wshift-count-negative] generated for unreachable code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67980 Bug ID: 67980 Summary: left shift count is negative [-Wshift-count-negative] generated for unreachable code Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Seve

[Bug c++/67980] left shift count is negative [-Wshift-count-negative] generated for unreachable code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67980 --- Comment #1 from Jacob McIntosh --- > but certainly this error shouldn't happen By error, I meant "warning".

[Bug c++/67980] left shift count is negative [-Wshift-count-negative] generated for unreachable code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67980 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- There is another bug about this specific issue.

[Bug target/67871] LTO falis for ARM big-endian

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67871 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Roelofs --- (In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #2) > Do you have big endian multilibs suitably built ? Yes, both the big-endian and little-endian multilibs seem to work, and have reasonable results in the

[Bug c++/67980] left shift count is negative [-Wshift-count-negative] generated for unreachable code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67980 --- Comment #3 from Jacob McIntosh --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > There is another bug about this specific issue. Which?

[Bug boehm-gc/66848] boehm-gc fails test suite on x86_64-apple-darwin15

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66848 --- Comment #16 from Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia --- (In reply to Jack Howarth from comment #14) > I finally got around to rebuilding the Apple open source release of > libunwind-35.3 from 10.10.5 under Xcode 7 on 10.10.5. The results are rather >

[Bug target/67871] LTO falis for ARM big-endian

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67871 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Roelofs --- s/ginutils/binutils/

[Bug testsuite/67948] xor-and.c needs updating after r228661

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67948 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/67966] [6 regression] ICE in convert_move, at expr.c:282

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67966 --- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou --- The x86-64 tester also recovered and reports the same failures as the x86 one, plus a few failures similar to this one on IA-64.

[Bug web/60933] Please do not advertise outdated version of gmp, mpfr, mpc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60933 --- Comment #11 from Leif Leonhardy --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2) > We've had situations in the past where the minimum suggested versions work > and the latest versions prevented GCC from building. Well, in the past... ;-) >

[Bug bootstrap/66319] [6 Regression] gcov-tool.c:84:65: error: invalid conversion from 'int (*)(const c har*, const stat*, int, FTW*)' to 'int (*)(const char*, const stat*, int, FTW)'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66319 --- Comment #10 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2015-10-15, at 10:32 AM, josephpattara at gmail dot com wrote: > Is there a similar fix also for the ia64 platform? I believe a similar fix could be developed along the lines of the change

[Bug boehm-gc/66848] boehm-gc fails test suite on x86_64-apple-darwin15

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66848 --- Comment #17 from Jack Howarth --- Okay, I have verified on 10.10 that llvm.org clang 3.6 builds a libunwind.dylib which doesn't show the boehm-gc test suite regressions but when libunwind.dylib is built with llvm.org clang 3.7, it does. Accor

[Bug c++/67913] new expression with negative size not diagnosed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67913 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/67981] New: new expression with zero size not diagnosed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67981 Bug ID: 67981 Summary: new expression with zero size not diagnosed Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/67981] new expression with zero size not diagnosed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67981 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/67882] surprising offsetof result on an invalid array member without diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67882 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/67882] surprising offsetof result on an invalid array member without diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67882 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- Patch posted for review: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-10/msg00915.html

[Bug middle-end/67966] [6 regression] ICE in convert_move, at expr.c:282

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67966 --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka --- > It's again a move between a BLKmode RHS and a DImode LHS. Frankly, I don't > understand why this is now allowed to reach the RTL expander, we will probably > need to add conversions on quite a number of path

[Bug ipa/67056] [5/6 regression] Wrong code generated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67056 --- Comment #14 from Jan Hubicka --- OK, the unreachable is introduced here: - Creating a specialized node of bool staticBoolFunc(CompositeClass*)/414 for all known contexts. the new node is /977.

[Bug ipa/67056] [5/6 regression] Wrong code generated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67056 --- Comment #15 from Jan Hubicka --- Created attachment 36520 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36520&action=edit Fix I am teching.

[Bug fortran/67982] New: Incorrect -Wunused-function warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67982 Bug ID: 67982 Summary: Incorrect -Wunused-function warning Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug ipa/67600] [5/6 Regression] Segfault when assigning only one char to ostreambuf_iterator compiled with -O2 or -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67600 --- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka --- OK, what it does is: Determining dynamic type for call: _50 = OBJ_TYPE_REF(_47;(struct basic_streambuf)&ostr._M_stringbuf->13) (&ostr._M_stringbuf, 88); Starting walk at: _46 = MEM[(struct basic_streambuf *)&

[Bug middle-end/67966] [6 regression] ICE in convert_move, at expr.c:282

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67966 --- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka --- Eric, can you, please, send me info how to reproduce the x86/x86_64 ICEs? Honza

[Bug c++/67983] New: ICE: Error reporting routines re-entered.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67983 Bug ID: 67983 Summary: ICE: Error reporting routines re-entered. Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/67983] ICE: Error reporting routines re-entered.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67983 --- Comment #1 from Allan McRae --- Created attachment 36522 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36522&action=edit Reduced testcase

[Bug c++/67983] ICE: Error reporting routines re-entered.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67983 --- Comment #2 from Allan McRae --- Observed with gcc-5.2.0 (5-20150623), x86_64, Arch Linux.

[Bug ipa/67600] [5/6 Regression] Segfault when assigning only one char to ostreambuf_iterator compiled with -O2 or -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67600 --- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka --- OK, the problem is that we loss offset of 64. This happens in get_dynamic_type where we restrict to inner class and get difference in between offset inside restricted type and offset from basic instance pointe

[Bug ipa/67056] [5/6 regression] Wrong code generated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67056 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #16 fr

[Bug ipa/66738] [5/6 Regression] optimizer bug related to exceptions and static symbols

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66738 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/67984] New: "internal compiler error:" with lot of loop optimizations enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67984 Bug ID: 67984 Summary: "internal compiler error:" with lot of loop optimizations enabled Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug boehm-gc/66848] boehm-gc fails test suite on x86_64-apple-darwin15

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66848 --- Comment #18 from Jack Howarth --- The upstream commit... https://github.com/ivmai/bdwgc/commit/faef04e7cb3741163dfdf65900ef5d2a0530be0f 2011-02-09 Ivan Maidanski * src/atomic_ops.c (AO_USE_NO_SIGNALS, AO_USE_NANOSLEEP): New