https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67917
Bug ID: 67917
Summary: ICE in openssl-1.0.2d.tar.gz
"/usr/include/openssl/bn.h:335:3: error:
TYPE_CANONICAL is not compatible"
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67912
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67779
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Apparently there is a nasty bug somewhere: if I sort
'String = 2 '
'String = 9 '
'String = 8 '
'String = 7 '
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67805
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67744
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43310
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66495
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66534
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> As the result the error above not generated but I see the next bug (See
> below).
> I am guessing many errors embedded for YDL 6.2, since
> my hardware (Old iBook; Power PC G3 Processor) is very out
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61968
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Is the problem fixed? Without feedback I'll assume yes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51292
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57530
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63205
Bug 63205 depends on bug 57530, which changed state.
Bug 57530 Summary: [OOP] Wrongly rejects type_pointer => class_target (which
have identical declared type)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57530
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53357
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #2 from Dominique
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40881
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20585
Bug 20585 depends on bug 40881, which changed state.
Bug 40881 Summary: [F03] warn for obsolescent features
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40881
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21130
Bug 21130 depends on bug 25708, which changed state.
Bug 25708 Summary: [F95] Module loading is not good at all
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25708
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25708
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32817
Bug 32817 depends on bug 25708, which changed state.
Bug 25708 Summary: [F95] Module loading is not good at all
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25708
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25391
Bug 25391 depends on bug 25708, which changed state.
Bug 25708 Summary: [F95] Module loading is not good at all
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25708
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30285
Bug 30285 depends on bug 25708, which changed state.
Bug 25708 Summary: [F95] Module loading is not good at all
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25708
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31139
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47876
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67740
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56423
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67745
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67715
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64097
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67714
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63346
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60919
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60358
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56156
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58315
--- Comment #36 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Created attachment 36472
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36472&action=edit
backported patch for the 4.9 branch
Chris,
retbnd is of no concern, nothing equivalent existed back then.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64097
--- Comment #2 from Harald Anlauf ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1)
> WORKSFORME on x86_64-apple-darwin14 with 4.8 up to trunk (6.0) and the
> various options I tried:
>
> [Book15] f90/bug% gfortran pr64097.f90 -fcheck=all -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58315
--- Comment #37 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Sat Oct 10 12:05:56 2015
New Revision: 228674
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228674&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Reset inlined debug variables at the end of the inlined function
for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58315
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64097
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41107
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20585
Bug 20585 depends on bug 41107, which changed state.
Bug 41107 Summary: [F03] Proc-pointer components: Fix calling DECL for f2c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41107
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56203
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35707
Bug 35707 depends on bug 49138, which changed state.
Bug 49138 Summary: Add /usr/include/fortran/{,gcc-} to the file/module
search path
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49138
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35707
--- Comment #17 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
*** Bug 49138 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49138
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51522
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|WAITING
--- Comment #10 from Domi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43899
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32164
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67918
Bug ID: 67918
Summary: -fdevirtualize causes binary to crash with
Segmentation Fault (CryptoPP involved)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67918
--- Comment #1 from Nameless <11throwaway11 at outlook dot com> ---
Created attachment 36474
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36474&action=edit
preprocessed file for fix1.cpp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67918
--- Comment #2 from Nameless <11throwaway11 at outlook dot com> ---
Created attachment 36475
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36475&action=edit
preprocessed file for fix2.cpp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67919
Bug ID: 67919
Summary: GCC Compiler failed with "gcc-5.2.0/gcc/expr.c:6529:1:
internal compiler error: output_operand: invalid shift
operand"
Product: gcc
Version
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67919
Xinus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||spsarolkar at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65223
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Summary|Regresion
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65223
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
The patch
--- ../_clean/gcc/fortran/resolve.c 2015-10-07 02:32:16.0 +0200
+++ gcc/fortran/resolve.c 2015-10-10 17:01:17.0 +0200
@@ -415,7 +415,7 @@ resolve_formal_arglist (gf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67911
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36159
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36159
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67918
Nameless <11throwaway11 at outlook dot com> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #36475|0 |1
is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67814
--- Comment #2 from Jameson ---
I did some further analysis with -dump-rtl-all -dump-tree-all. The SSA form
looked fine, as did the initial conversion to RTL. It seemed like something
confused the rtl-reload pass such that decided to reordered th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67920
Bug ID: 67920
Summary: wrong code with -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67920
--- Comment #1 from James Almer ---
For reference you can also check
http://fate.ffmpeg.org/report.cgi?time=20151010052205&slot=x86_64-archlinux-gcc-experimental
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67920
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Can you also compile with -fsanitize=undefined and try that? Can you also try
-fsanitize=address ?
This might detect if it is a bug in the code vs a bug in GCC.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67921
Bug ID: 67921
Summary: "internal compiler error: in build_polynomial_chrec,
at tree-chrec.h:147" when using -fsanitize=undefined
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67918
--- Comment #4 from Nameless <11throwaway11 at outlook dot com> ---
A little update.
I decided to check the piece of code that was causing "execution reached
__builtin_unreachable() call". So here's it:
virtual void ResizeBuffers()
{
m_r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67920
--- Comment #3 from James Almer ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Can you also compile with -fsanitize=undefined and try that? Can you also
> try -fsanitize=address ?
>
> This might detect if it is a bug in the code vs a bug in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67922
Bug ID: 67922
Summary: std::unordered_map::clear should take time linear in
the number of elements
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
65 matches
Mail list logo
