https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66438
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66437
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66355
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
PR 65197 has links to a number of related PRs. The middle-end has no code to
handle the case where we detect "late" (i.e. not in the front-end) that the
initialization is constant.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66438
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #1)
> You always need to use the libstdc++ that is bundled with the compiler.
Actually that is true but that does not make this bug a valid bug. What is
mentioned is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66258
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66030
--- Comment #10 from Kai Tietz ---
Yeah, thanks for working on that. With extensions shown by Jouni, the patch is
preapproved. Jonathan, will you take care?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66258
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> Do you plan to backport this to gcc-5-branch?
As I mentioned this is really needed to compile grub so if it is not back
ported, you can't compile a full Linux di
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66030
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Yes, I'll deal with it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66438
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Indeed. Before gcc-5 it was never supported to combine C++11 objects compiled
with different major versions.
The whole point of calling C++11 support experimental was that we reserved the
right to make inc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66262
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely ---
PR66438 has a proper analysis of this issue (and it isn't related to PR66145)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66441
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66438
--- Comment #4 from Gianfranco ---
The problem actually is Debian has gcc-4.9 as default compiler, and the
libstdc++ provided in testing is from gcc-5.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66438
James Y Knight changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66438
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66438
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
If you can provide a patch that makes it work without any unwanted side effects
then I'll certainly look at it, but mixing versions for C++11 code is
unsupported, and so I'm not going to spend my time tryin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66438
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Created attachment 35708
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35708&action=edit
Compare old and new categories
This fixes this specific testcase, but not all cases (if you compare
error_con
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66442
Bug ID: 66442
Summary: [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/autopar/pr46885.c (test
for excess errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66442
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66438
--- Comment #9 from James Y Knight ---
What good is having special code to allow linking compatibility, if the program
then can't work anyways? Isn't that anti-useful?
> I didn't realise you were the maintainer and knew what's supposed to work.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66438
James Y Knight changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47359
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Jun 6 16:12:39 2015
New Revision: 224190
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224190&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-06-06 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/47359
* arith.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47359
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Jun 6 16:16:03 2015
New Revision: 224191
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224191&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-06-06 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/47359
* ChangeLo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47659
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39366
Bill Torpey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bill.torpey at ullink dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47359
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66443
Bug ID: 66443
Summary: Virtual inheritance vs. non-default constructors
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66319
--- Comment #7 from John David Anglin ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Jun 6 18:33:06 2015
New Revision: 224192
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224192&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/66319
* config/pa/pa-hpux10.h (TARGET_O
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66319
--- Comment #8 from John David Anglin ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Jun 6 18:35:16 2015
New Revision: 224193
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224193&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/66319
* config/pa/pa-hpux10.h (TARGET_O
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66444
Bug ID: 66444
Summary: [5/6 Regression] Miscompilation of Xen since r211078
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66444
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66442
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66445
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66445
Bug ID: 66445
Summary: [5/6 Regression] ICE with lambda in stmt expression in
a template
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66442
--- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The problem is here:
...
static bool
try_transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt (struct loop *loop,
reduction_info_table_type
*reduction_list,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66348
--- Comment #11 from Sebastiano Vigna ---
Dear Mikhail,
I have several ongoing open-source projects and, believe me, I make exactly the
same recommendation to people reporting bugs. They are perfectly sensible and
certainly the way to go in 99% o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66348
--- Comment #12 from Sebastiano Vigna ---
BTW, to further restrict the search I'm trying to replicate the bug with
-fsanitize=address, or at least to get to the problematic call under
-fsanitize=address, but it'll take a while. I have to recompil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66446
Bug ID: 66446
Summary: Incorrect symbol output with -fno-omit-frame-pointer
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66447
Bug ID: 66447
Summary: -Werror=maybe-uninitialized indicates trashing of
variable across longjmp
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66258
--- Comment #7 from jim.wilson at linaro dot org ---
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 2:02 AM, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
wrote:
>> Do you plan to backport this to gcc-5-branch?
I didn't realize it was broken on the gcc-5 release branch. I only
checked m
39 matches
Mail list logo
