https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66180
Bug ID: 66180
Summary: [6 Regression] many -Wodr false positives when
building LLVM with -flto
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66180
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Some look real to me due to anonymous namespace usage.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66180
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Some look real to me due to anonymous namespace usage.
Can you elaborate on that? I always thought that anonymous namespaces
where a good tool for fixing O
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66140
--- Comment #6 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Sun May 17 07:24:27 2015
New Revision: 223266
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223266&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/66140
* config/alpha/alpha.c (get_aligne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66140
--- Comment #7 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Sun May 17 07:26:56 2015
New Revision: 223267
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223267&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/66140
* config/alpha/alpha.c (get_aligne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66180
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
BTW gcc-5 crashes when building LLVM with lto (looks like
a dup of PR66027):
Linking CXX executable ../../../../bin/clang
constant 64>
unit size constant 8>
align 8 symtab 0 alias set -1 can
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66027
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66140
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||alpha
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66181
Bug ID: 66181
Summary: [6 Regression]: /usr/include/bits/types.h:134:16: ICE:
verify_type failed
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66181
--- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Created attachment 35557
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35557&action=edit
Preprocessed source
Preprocessed source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66181
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66182
Bug ID: 66182
Summary: Unneeded temporary for elemental functions of function
results
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66162
--- Comment #2 from simon at pushface dot org ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #1)
> Why on Earth are you doing this? No plan to look into it.
Because I agree with Randy Brukardt in
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.lang.ada/ECJm5q
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66004
--- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #3)
> Something supposedly very good happened recently, because:
> r223225 18369501023
>
> I'll just have to find out what caused that 50% cut! The test-cas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66162
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
> People who want to write Ada for MCUs aren’t necessarily in the
> high-integrity world; some would want to cram as much of the language as
> possible into the RTS.
That's not the problem., just avoid using
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37131
--- Comment #31 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun May 17 13:45:07 2015
New Revision: 223268
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223268&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-05-17 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/37131
* gfortra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66027
--- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
trippels@gcc75 ~ % cat ASTContext_preproc.cpp
namespace std {
template struct pair {
_T1 first;
_T2 second;
};
template pair<_T1, _T2> make_pair(_T1, _T2);
}
namespace llvm {
class StringRef;
}
us
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66162
--- Comment #4 from simon at pushface dot org ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #3)
> > People who want to write Ada for MCUs aren’t necessarily in the
> > high-integrity world; some would want to cram as much of the language as
> > poss
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66174
--- Comment #5 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Sun May 17 15:08:16 2015
New Revision: 223269
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223269&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/66174
* config/i386/i386.c (expand_vec_p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66162
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |NEW
Summary|Bug box compiling
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65942
--- Comment #10 from Avi Kivity ---
Any chance that the fix can be committed? gcc 5 is useless for me without
this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66183
Bug ID: 66183
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr66123.c
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66183
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin ---
(gdb) p debug_rtx (x)
(const:SI (plus:SI (label_ref:SI 29)
(const_int -2 [0xfffe])))
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65979
--- Comment #11 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
So, I have tried disabling some of the patches but it seems that these depend
on each other. Thus, I will probably have to checkout gcc from source via git
and revert the patches using git.
Unle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65873
--- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Sun May 17 17:43:04 2015
New Revision: 223270
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223270&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ipa/65873
* ipa-inline.c (can_inline_edge_p): Allow e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66184
Bug ID: 66184
Summary: Rejection of partial specialization of a variable
template in a non-global namespace
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65942
Harald van Dijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||harald at gigawatt dot nl
--- Comment
-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20150517 (experimental) [trunk revision 223265] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -O2 small.c; ./a.out
$ gcc-5.1 -O3 small.c; ./a.out
$
$ gcc-trunk -O3 small.c
small.c: In function ‘main’:
small.c:5:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
main
-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20150517 (experimental) [trunk revision 223265] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -O2 small.c; ./a.out
$ gcc-4.8.4 -O3 small.c; ./a.out
$
$ gcc-trunk -O3 small.c
$ ./a.out
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
$ gcc-5.1 -O3 small.c
$ ./a.out
Segmentation
--enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20150517 (experimental) [trunk revision 223265] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -O0 small.c; ./a.out
$ gcc-trunk -Os small.c; ./a.out
$ gcc-5.1 -O1 small.c; ./a.out
$
$ gcc-trunk -O1 small.c
$ ./a.out
Aborted (core dumped
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66181
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66047
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Sun May 17 19:41:23 2015
New Revision: 223272
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223272&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/66047
* i386.c (ix86_function_sseregparm): Only
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66047
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
Summary|[5 Regression] vlc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65942
--- Comment #12 from Harald van Dijk ---
(In reply to Harald van Dijk from comment #11)
> The programs in my comment here are accepted by G++ 4.5.4 (with -std=c++0x),
> and rejected by 4.6.4 and later.
But as G++ 4.5 recognises but simply ignore
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66181
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54236
--- Comment #12 from Oleg Endo ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Sun May 17 21:01:29 2015
New Revision: 223274
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223274&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/54236
* config/sh/sh.md (*addc_2r_t): Use a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66148
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin ---
Introduced in r223034:
2015-05-12 Thomas Preud'homme
* combine.c i(set_nonzero_bits_and_sign_copies): Split code updating
rsp->sign_bit_copies and rsp->nonzero_bits into ...
(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66148
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin ---
Created attachment 35559
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35559&action=edit
Preprocessed source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66038
--- Comment #9 from Douglas Mencken ---
I decided to use git bisect to figure out.
Working genmatch@stage2:
commit 852fa94e29ebd44814054f4657b7385788b0321b (2014-12-16)
$ prev-gcc/build/genmatch --gimple ../gcc-git/gcc/match.pd >../o1
$ gcc/b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66079
--- Comment #3 from Damian Rouson ---
Thanks for working on this.
Damian
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66181
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62103
Thomas Preud'homme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66168
Thomas Preud'homme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66188
Bug ID: 66188
Summary: gcc crashed when compiling programs
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14741
--- Comment #32 from Joost VandeVondele
---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #31)
> If the middle end is not up to this, should we be looking at doing loop
> blocking in the Fortran front end, at least for the Matmul intrinsic?
I think t
45 matches
Mail list logo
